|
Posted by Solar Flare on February 5, 2008, 8:44 pm
Please log in for more thread options Clean up the coal emissions then. We need to conserve and make the
most of all energy sources, not waste them.
>
>>
>> 1: Quote
>> ( hydrogen fuel cell, check out the actual cost per
>> watt)
>> Dunno the cost per wat (13amps 12v)but at 289.00 its a good deal to
>> get 40 to 70% better fuel mileage.
>
> 40 to 70% better than what? Show your work and provide references
> please. Are you considering the entire hydrogen fuel cycle or just
> the part of it that looks good?
>
>>
>> 2: (especially
>> if you have to replace the catalyst at the end of its lifetime)
>> The "Catalyst" is actually electrolyte and is a mix of baking soda
>> and
>> distilled water. (but if this .69cent gallon of distilled water is
>> too
>> much for you then don't read any further)
>
> Reference please? Last I heard the catalyst is actually a
> precious metal-containing matrix. If fuel cell have suddenly become
> cheap, long-lasting, and reliable, please educate me. I am ready to
> learn.
>
>>
>> 3: (And that is only if you buy his idea that he is getting
>> "Free"
>> Hydrogen, with his setup. Just a little less "Free" than the PV
>> electricity used to make it; I would guess.)
>>
>> Bad guess the cost of a PV system is not even close to the amount
>> of
>> damage done by the coal fired plants that litter the country.
>
> You missed the point. PV electricity has a high economic cost,
> and is not without environmental cost. Taking this high cost
> electricity and then throwing half of it away to the inefficiencies
> of the hydrogen fuel cycle flies in the face of any reason. You
> see, the problem with the hydrogen fuel cycle is that it is highly
> inefficient. It makes no difference where the electricity comes
> from to power it, inefficient is inefficient. "Inefficient: is
> rarely environmentally sound.
>
> BTW, I dislike coal plants as much as you do, but that is beside
> the point.
>
> Vaughn
>
|