Re: Energy 101 [was Re: OT Hydrogen economy, not?]

Home Power - Home Power/Home-Made Power for Off-Grid Living. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Energy 101 [was Re: OT Hydrogen economy, not?] Vaughn Simon 07-22-2008
Posted by Vaughn Simon on July 22, 2008, 8:07 am
Please log in for more thread options

>Subject: Re: Energy 101 [was Re: OT Hydrogen economy, not?]
>If you'd bothered to actually READ ALL of my post you'd realize that I was
>talking about the added drag from raising the condenser temperature and
>therefore pressure enough to make the temperature of condenser discharge water
>useful.

For those who are still following this subthread: If you haven't studied the
thermodynamics involved in steam plants, it is impossible for you to understand
the importance of a condensing system to the system's efficiency. (I only know
because the Navy made me learn)

Here are a few simple points:

1) Understand this if you understand nothing else: A condenser system is not
just about the convenience of returning feed water to the steam system! A steam
plant operating without a condenser (exhausting spent steam directly to the
atmosphere) is operating at a fraction of the efficiency compared to the same
plant operating with a condenser.

2) You can't possibly economically "tap steam" from a condensing system because
at that point in the system you have a vacuum. At a guess, you would have to
expend more energy pumping the steam out of the condenser than you would recover
from the steam. This is why John tells us that you would have to tap the steam
from some higher pressure point.

3) It is possible to recover heat from the cooling water that passes through the
condenser, but the cooling water side of condensers are always designed for a
high flow rate and minimum temperature gain. This is because condensers must be
kept as cold as possible for most efficient steam plant operation. River water
might enter the plant at 50 degrees and leave at 55 degrees. You can't heat a
house with 55 degree water. Therefore, the energy gained by this cooling water
is nearly useless to us. Though John just suggested a use I hadn't thought of,
as a source for a heat pump.

Vaughn





Posted by on July 23, 2008, 2:39 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:07:34 GMT Vaughn Simon

| 3) It is possible to recover heat from the cooling water that passes through
the
| condenser, but the cooling water side of condensers are always designed for a
| high flow rate and minimum temperature gain. This is because condensers must
be
| kept as cold as possible for most efficient steam plant operation. River
water
| might enter the plant at 50 degrees and leave at 55 degrees. You can't heat a
| house with 55 degree water. Therefore, the energy gained by this cooling
water
| is nearly useless to us. Though John just suggested a use I hadn't thought
of,
| as a source for a heat pump.

Any temperature increase is more energy. The question is whether or not it is
sufficient to be worth the cost of building such an infrastructure. But then
at a higher temperature, the system has more heat loss due to the difference
relative to the environment, and needs more insulation. So distance would be
an issue, too. Try pumping hot water from Texas to North Dakota.

--
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, googlegroups.com is blocked. Due to ignorance |
| by the abuse department, bellsouth.net is blocked. If you post to |
| Usenet from these places, find another Usenet provider ASAP. |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at ipal.net) |

Posted by stu on July 23, 2008, 9:10 pm
Please log in for more thread options

>
> >Subject: Re: Energy 101 [was Re: OT Hydrogen economy, not?]
> >If you'd bothered to actually READ ALL of my post you'd realize that I
was
> >talking about the added drag from raising the condenser temperature and
> >therefore pressure enough to make the temperature of condenser discharge
water
> >useful.
>
> For those who are still following this subthread: If you haven't
studied the
> thermodynamics involved in steam plants, it is impossible for you to
understand
> the importance of a condensing system to the system's efficiency. (I only
know
> because the Navy made me learn)
>
> Here are a few simple points:
>
> 1) Understand this if you understand nothing else: A condenser system is
not
> just about the convenience of returning feed water to the steam system! A
steam
> plant operating without a condenser (exhausting spent steam directly to
the
> atmosphere) is operating at a fraction of the efficiency compared to the
same
> plant operating with a condenser.
How much of "a fraction" are you talking about? I wouldn't have thought it
would make that much difference. Although they would be upset about losing
their wonderfully clean feed water.
>
> 2) You can't possibly economically "tap steam" from a condensing system
because
> at that point in the system you have a vacuum. At a guess, you would have
to
> expend more energy pumping the steam out of the condenser than you would
recover
> from the steam. This is why John tells us that you would have to tap the
steam
> from some higher pressure point.
>
> 3) It is possible to recover heat from the cooling water that passes
through the
> condenser, but the cooling water side of condensers are always designed
for a
> high flow rate and minimum temperature gain. This is because condensers
must be
> kept as cold as possible for most efficient steam plant operation. River
water
> might enter the plant at 50 degrees and leave at 55 degrees. You can't
heat a
> house with 55 degree water. Therefore, the energy gained by this cooling
water
> is nearly useless to us. Though John just suggested a use I hadn't
thought of,
> as a source for a heat pump.
I thought the low temp raise from inlet to outlet was about protecting the
fish/plants in the river. I'm not even sure all the water passing through
the plant goes over the condenser, I think there is some "post mixing" to
cool the condenser water before release. (but this would vary from place to
place)



Posted by Vaughn Simon on July 23, 2008, 9:59 pm
Please log in for more thread options

>
> I thought the low temp raise from inlet to outlet was about protecting the
> fish/plants in the river.

That is certainly a consideration, but I was talking strictly about the steam
plant. For most efficient operation of the steam plant, the condenser must cool
the steam at much as possible and do it as quickly as possible. As the steam
plant operator, you would judge this mostly by glancing at the condenser vacuum.
A small change in condenser temperature can make a big change in the vacuum,
which makes a big change in the steam plant's efficiency. This is not just some
textbook stuff, this is something the operator can actually see and fret about.
When traveling from the Atlantic into the warmer Mediterranean Sea, we could see
a huge (and unwelcome) change.

Vaughn



Posted by daestrom on July 26, 2008, 12:20 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Vaughn Simon wrote:
>>
>> I thought the low temp raise from inlet to outlet was about
>> protecting the fish/plants in the river.
>
> That is certainly a consideration, but I was talking strictly about
> the steam plant. For most efficient operation of the steam plant,
> the condenser must cool the steam at much as possible and do it as
> quickly as possible. As the steam plant operator, you would judge
> this mostly by glancing at the condenser vacuum. A small change in
> condenser temperature can make a big change in the vacuum, which
> makes a big change in the steam plant's efficiency. This is not just
> some textbook stuff, this is something the operator can actually see
> and fret about. When traveling from the Atlantic into the warmer
> Mediterranean Sea, we could see a huge (and unwelcome) change.

We also saw such changes along the east coast when diving/surfacing. The
thermocline rising into the Gulf Stream would cause a distinct change in
condenser vacuum.

It also played havoc with the lower-level watch as he would have to manually
adjust the aux-seawater flow to all the lube-oil coolers. And
lithium-bromide chillers didn't like the sudden changes either ;-)

daestrom


Similar ThreadsPosted
Waste heat as heat source [was Re: Energy 101 [was Re: OT Hydrogen economy, not?]} July 22, 2008, 1:59 am
Air Products and FuelCell Energy Begin Construction of High Efficiency Hydrogen Energy Station March 20, 2007, 12:14 pm
OT Hydrogen economy, not? July 16, 2008, 8:58 am
New Energy Economy Emerging in the United States November 17, 2008, 4:04 am
Hydrogen Economy Waiting on Technology to Catch Up July 2, 2008, 7:19 am
Members Committed to Energy Independence Introduce Hydrogen Legislation February 4, 2007, 12:44 pm
Mikhail Prokhorov: 'We Are Set to Develop Hydrogen Energy on World Scale' April 5, 2007, 10:00 am
Green Energy Summit 2009: Clean Technology, Renewable Energy, and Sustainability November 15, 2008, 12:52 am
Asia's largest conference on Green Energy, Clean Technology and Renewable energy November 20, 2008, 1:30 am
Refrigerator Energy Usage - cost-benefit analysis energy star August 9, 2008, 10:49 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
XML SitemapXML Sitemap