Re: Landfill Methane Electric Generators

Home Power - Home Power/Home-Made Power for Off-Grid Living. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Landfill Methane Electric Generators daestrom 04-13-2008
Posted by daestrom on April 13, 2008, 12:26 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> Too big for homepower but
> I thought somebody here might have something to say
> about this ...
>
> I attend several civic/community meetings per month...
> recently I attended a meeting that outlined the following
> plan to put two Methane Electric Generators at a closed landfill.
> Each generator can produce up to over +1 MwattHours --
> the total facility output of +2 MwattHourss would be
> sold back(via Net Metering) to the local Utility (PEPCO).

You don't really say, but I'm going to *assume* these are diesel-engine
units. I've seen similar units discussed on TV that they can run off the
methane from a landfill.

And you seem to have some units mixed up. They probably are 1 Mwatt units.
That sounds about right for a mid-sized stationary diesel set. But 1
MwattHours wouldn't mean anything unless you can say over how much time it
takes to generate that much energy.

<snip>
>
>
> Current CNG Flare Emissions for 2007 ( Normalized to 810 SCFM)
> TSP =01.85 tons/yr
> SOx =01.69 tons/yr
> NOx =04.53 tons/yr
> CO =80.68 tons/yr
> VOC =00.02 tons/yr
> PM(10) =01.85 tons/yr
>
>
> Proposed CNG Generator Emissions( Normalized to 810 SCFM)
> TSP =05.11 tons/yr
> SOx =01.66 tons/yr
> NOx =19.75 tons/yr
> CO =95.43 tons/yr
> VOC =23.03 tons/yr
> PM(10) =05.11 tons/yr
>
>
> Maryland Dept of Environment (MDE) Standards for
> Significant Source Emissions
> TSP =015.00 tons/yr
> SOx =040.00 tons/yr
> NOx =025.00 tons/yr
> CO =100.00 tons/yr
> VOC =025.00 tons/yr
> PM(10) =015.00 tons/yr
>
>
> The only emission that is approaching the state limits is
> the VOC ( Volatile Organic Compound) level. Electrical,
> Operational (Heat Output) , and emission are monitored
> remotely and controlled via computer. Typical landfill
> VOC gases include benzene ( albeit it could be a
> something else). Nobody was explaining what
> TSP or PM(10) was ...but I recognized Sulfur Oxide,
> Nitrioxide, and Carbon Monoxide in the chart above.
>

I suspect PM(10) is a measure of 'Particulate Matter' (maybe the '10' is the
size of the particles??). Some older diesels have a bad reputation for
creating soot particles and blowing them into the air. Newer ones are much
better though.


>
> Electricity cost have been gradually increasing
> due to deregulation -

Well, they certainly have risen, but I don't know that I'd blame it '...due
to deregulation'.

> Given the following electricity
> rate below - I expect this proposed facility
> will generate about $1,793,000/ year
>
> PEPCO electricity
> generation charge for 1KWH = .1023400 USD
> Energy charge for 1KWH = .0187777 USD
> Transmission charge for 1KWH = .0040200 USD
>

So the obvious question is, "Do they get paid all those for their
'net-metering' or just the generation charge?"

Their income will probably be a bit less than that. I'd be surprised if the
engine could run 24/7 for an entire year without maintenance. So maybe 80%
to 90% of that number.

>
>
> The county will own the generators and pay a private
> contractor to monitor and service the facility.
> The minimum contractor response time to
> reach the facility is 2 hours.
>
> At the Environmental impact public briefing that
> I had attended recently, the local neighboring residents
> who lost their wells to the closed landfill expressed
> a high level of skepticism about how neighborhood
> friendly the proposed facility might be. I asked that
> the project manager look into presenting possible
> noise abatement and emission scrubber options to the
> public.
>
>
> Did I miss anything?
>
> Should I have asked about anything else?
>

Maybe what PM(10) and TSP are... :-)

And as another pointed out, why do some of the emissions go up? I can
understand NOx rising, it's created in just about any internal combustion
engine. SOx stays about the same because it comes from the fuel being used
and that is being released anyway. But CO should go down unless the
engine's not being maintained. Having CO in the fuel supply just means the
air-fuel mixture is a bit different than straight methane. But the engine
gets hot enough to burn CO into CO2. And I too don't understand VOC rising
so dramatically.

daestrom


Posted by BobG on April 13, 2008, 3:29 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Read up on Capstone MicroTurbines. Size of a fridge, put out 30KW on
landfill methane (which is about the most unpure methane imaginable).
They are easy to set up a bunch of these right at the flue site.

Posted by Neon John on April 13, 2008, 4:43 pm
Please log in for more thread options

>Read up on Capstone MicroTurbines. Size of a fridge, put out 30KW on
>landfill methane (which is about the most unpure methane imaginable).
>They are easy to set up a bunch of these right at the flue site.

Yaaaa, and in 10,000 hours when the Capstone goes tango uniform, you have a very
expensive lump of exotic metal and ceramic.

Capstone is the answer to questions never asked*, especially in this situation
where
vastly more reliable aeroderived gas turbines (GE, Rolls-Royce, etc.) are readily
available that are designed to run for decades with little more than routine
maintenance.

Spending the money on a gas turbine in this electrical capacity range would be
rather
foolish, given the relative cheapness and reliability of large spark ignited
reciprocating engines. That's why one never sees gas turbines in this sort of
application.

BTW, where did you get the notion that landfill methane is dirty? Certainly
hasn't
been my experience and I've BTDT.

John

* Well, it does answer one question "How do I suck up federal and gullible
investor
money?"
--
John De Armond
See my website for my current email address
http://www.neon-john.com
http://www.johndearmond.com <-- best little blog on the net!
Tellico Plains, Occupied TN
Serenity: That feeling of knowing that your secretary will never tell either of
your wives.


Posted by Vaughn Simon on April 13, 2008, 4:47 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> Read up on Capstone MicroTurbines. Size of a fridge, put out 30KW on
> landfill methane (which is about the most unpure methane imaginable).
> They are easy to set up a bunch of these right at the flue site.

I don't know why you think that a multitude of small, expensive machines
would be superior to fewer machines properly sized for the job, but a quick look
at Capstone's balance sheet should give anyone pause to reflect on the company's
future. They haven't made money yet, and things don't seem to be improving. If
I were evaluating bids (I do sometimes on my job) I wouldn't give this company a
second look.

See page 25 of this document:
http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/12/120708/FY2007_AnnualReport.pdf

Vaughn



Posted by Neon John on April 13, 2008, 4:09 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:26:26 -0400, "daestrom"
wrote:


>You don't really say, but I'm going to *assume* these are diesel-engine
>units. I've seen similar units discussed on TV that they can run off the
>methane from a landfill.

I'm fairly familiar with the setups in this area, being friends with the guy who
runs
the company. The engines look like diesels but are actually spark ignited.
It's a
diesel block and head but with reduced compression and an ignition system.

>
>And you seem to have some units mixed up. They probably are 1 Mwatt units.
>That sounds about right for a mid-sized stationary diesel set. But 1
>MwattHours wouldn't mean anything unless you can say over how much time it
>takes to generate that much energy.

It's not "CNG" either, as no high pressure natural gas is involved. It appears
that
this guy knows just enough to get himself up in arms about anything new. A find
specimen of a NIMBY.

>And as another pointed out, why do some of the emissions go up? I can
>understand NOx rising, it's created in just about any internal combustion
>engine. SOx stays about the same because it comes from the fuel being used
>and that is being released anyway. But CO should go down unless the
>engine's not being maintained. Having CO in the fuel supply just means the
>air-fuel mixture is a bit different than straight methane. But the engine
>gets hot enough to burn CO into CO2. And I too don't understand VOC rising
>so dramatically.

When people throw around BS numbers, they tend to look, well, bullshitty.

John

--
John De Armond
See my website for my current email address
http://www.neon-john.com
http://www.johndearmond.com <-- best little blog on the net!
Tellico Plains, Occupied TN
Democracy is three wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for supper.


Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: Landfill Methane Electric Generators April 13, 2008, 9:40 am
Free homebrew wind, solar, methane plans October 17, 2008, 1:52 am
generators August 20, 2007, 6:20 pm
generators August 20, 2007, 6:22 pm
Parallel generators September 1, 2007, 11:18 am
Buying Used Generators January 4, 2008, 7:35 pm
Honda generators September 18, 2008, 11:45 pm
Re: Inverters used with gasoline generators? January 11, 2007, 12:56 pm
Noise of sm. wind generators? October 4, 2007, 11:51 am
Turbine style generators March 16, 2008, 5:29 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
XML SitemapXML Sitemap