small energy

Home Power - Home Power/Home-Made Power for Off-Grid Living. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
small energy henderson.dwight@gmail.com 01-16-2008
Posted by Anthony Matonak on January 18, 2008, 12:29 pm
Please log in for more thread options
grandpa wrote:
...
> I am saying using the air pressure to push a liquid out of a tank. The
> fluid pressure will be the same as the air pressure above the liquid in the
> tank.

Agreed.

> fluid turbines have more power per pressure release ratio. something to do
> with moving masss.

I don't understand what you are trying to say here. Yes, water turbines
are smaller compared to air turbines that produce the same power because
water is a more dense fluid. This doesn't mean that water turbines are
more efficient than air turbines or that you'll gain anything by taking
air pressure, moving water with it and then moving a turbine with the
water.

You should be able to do just as well with just an engine or turbine
run by compressed air and doing without the water entirely.

Anthony

Posted by Solar Flare on January 18, 2008, 1:24 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I like the free (extra) energy concept. If he can make it work he will
have made liars out of every law of science and scientist in history.

> grandpa wrote:
> ...
>> I am saying using the air pressure to push a liquid out of a tank.
>> The fluid pressure will be the same as the air pressure above the
>> liquid in the tank.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> fluid turbines have more power per pressure release ratio.
>> something to do with moving masss.
>
> I don't understand what you are trying to say here. Yes, water
> turbines
> are smaller compared to air turbines that produce the same power
> because
> water is a more dense fluid. This doesn't mean that water turbines
> are
> more efficient than air turbines or that you'll gain anything by
> taking
> air pressure, moving water with it and then moving a turbine with
> the
> water.
>
> You should be able to do just as well with just an engine or turbine
> run by compressed air and doing without the water entirely.
>
> Anthony



Posted by Bob F on January 18, 2008, 3:20 pm
Please log in for more thread options
And where exactly did the O.P. make the claim of a "free (extra) energy
concept"?

I don't see it in the quoted text, or elsewhere in this thread.


>I like the free (extra) energy concept. If he can make it work he will have
>made liars out of every law of science and scientist in history.
>
>> grandpa wrote:
>> ...
>>> I am saying using the air pressure to push a liquid out of a tank. The fluid
>>> pressure will be the same as the air pressure above the liquid in the tank.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>>> fluid turbines have more power per pressure release ratio. something to do
>>> with moving masss.
>>
>> I don't understand what you are trying to say here. Yes, water turbines
>> are smaller compared to air turbines that produce the same power because
>> water is a more dense fluid. This doesn't mean that water turbines are
>> more efficient than air turbines or that you'll gain anything by taking
>> air pressure, moving water with it and then moving a turbine with the
>> water.
>>
>> You should be able to do just as well with just an engine or turbine
>> run by compressed air and doing without the water entirely.
>>
>> Anthony
>
>



Posted by Solar Flare on January 18, 2008, 9:43 pm
Please log in for more thread options
grandpa did , not the OP. Try to keep up. Perhaps you could learn to
follow threads or even read the attachment below.


> And where exactly did the O.P. make the claim of a "free (extra)
> energy concept"?
>
> I don't see it in the quoted text, or elsewhere in this thread.
>
>
>>I like the free (extra) energy concept. If he can make it work he
>>will have made liars out of every law of science and scientist in
>>history.
>>
>>> grandpa wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> I am saying using the air pressure to push a liquid out of a
>>>> tank. The fluid pressure will be the same as the air pressure
>>>> above the liquid in the tank.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>>> fluid turbines have more power per pressure release ratio.
>>>> something to do with moving masss.
>>>
>>> I don't understand what you are trying to say here. Yes, water
>>> turbines
>>> are smaller compared to air turbines that produce the same power
>>> because
>>> water is a more dense fluid. This doesn't mean that water turbines
>>> are
>>> more efficient than air turbines or that you'll gain anything by
>>> taking
>>> air pressure, moving water with it and then moving a turbine with
>>> the
>>> water.
>>>
>>> You should be able to do just as well with just an engine or
>>> turbine
>>> run by compressed air and doing without the water entirely.
>>>
>>> Anthony
>>
>>
>
>



Posted by Trygve Lillefosse on January 19, 2008, 10:34 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I have not seen any reference to free energy here. He simply wants to
store energy with less loss than with air only.

The solution he talks about, sounds just like my basement water-tank.
Although my water tank is there so that the well pump only has to do
work for a short period of time.

The air pressure builds up to a set limit, and when I have used enough
water to lower the pressure to another set limit, the pump does
another run.

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:24:38 -0500, "Solar Flare"

>I like the free (extra) energy concept. If he can make it work he will
>have made liars out of every law of science and scientist in history.
>
>> grandpa wrote:
>> ...
>>> I am saying using the air pressure to push a liquid out of a tank.
>>> The fluid pressure will be the same as the air pressure above the
>>> liquid in the tank.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>>> fluid turbines have more power per pressure release ratio.
>>> something to do with moving masss.
>>
>> I don't understand what you are trying to say here. Yes, water
>> turbines
>> are smaller compared to air turbines that produce the same power
>> because
>> water is a more dense fluid. This doesn't mean that water turbines
>> are
>> more efficient than air turbines or that you'll gain anything by
>> taking
>> air pressure, moving water with it and then moving a turbine with
>> the
>> water.
>>
>> You should be able to do just as well with just an engine or turbine
>> run by compressed air and doing without the water entirely.
>>
>> Anthony
>


--
SEE YA !!!
Trygve Lillefosse
AKA - Malawi, The Fisher King

Similar ThreadsPosted
Wind Energy Small wind turbines January 11, 2007, 3:20 pm
Brake for small windmill? September 13, 2007, 10:49 pm
Re: Brake for small windmill? September 19, 2007, 11:27 am
Re: Brake for small windmill? September 22, 2007, 12:22 pm
Small 3 phase AC motor? March 14, 2008, 7:39 pm
Small grid-tie inverters? June 19, 2008, 4:28 pm
Using a Kill-a-Watt with small 240 and 277 V loads August 31, 2007, 1:18 pm
small engine hour meter February 29, 2008, 1:46 pm
Small homemade charge controller April 12, 2008, 3:52 pm
Small Size Power Pv Module January 7, 2009, 4:52 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
XML SitemapXML Sitemap