Lifetime of a Toyota Prius

Toyota Prius - - Best car on the road 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Lifetime of a Toyota Prius Phil 01-18-2007
Posted by Phil on January 24, 2007, 5:32 am
Please log in for more thread options



My real concern was not so much the battery life as the vehicle life.
If the battery last 7-10 years thats quite reasonable. But for toyota
to say the car itself has a life of less than 10 years concerns me. I
am very much a buy and drive till it dies sort of car owner. I have
previously had a manual Mazda 626 which lasted 21 years (1 engine
recondition) and a Mitsubishi Nimbus which is still going strong after
14 years (one replacement automatic transmission and another not so far
away).

For the price of a Prius I would expect a lifetime of at least 16 years
(if not 20). When I calculate the total purchase and lifetime running
costs (petrol, insurance, maintainence, tyres, etc) for a Prius
(assuming lifespan of 10 years) and compare it to a V6 Camry (assuming
lifespan of 16 years) I get an annualised cost for the Prius of
AUD$7500 per annum and for the V6 Camry of AUD$6800 per annum.

That means that even with the much lower petrol costs, the shorter life
makes the Prius a more expensive option. The calculation would be
completely different if the Prius was made to last 16 years (the
annualised cost for the Prius would drop to AUD$6100 per annum).

So is Toyota saying you pay a premium to be environmentally
responsible?



1810@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> >>The article was dated october 2003<<-----------------------------------=
---------
>
> Thanks for the links. I read both articles.
> I can relate to your pre-purchase concern about the batteries. In 2002 our
> local Toyota dealer finally had a Prius we could actually touch instead of
> just reading about. We spoke with their service department and found out =
if
> the battery pack failed after the warrantee a replacement would cost $4800
> (US). It didn't scare me away because I just plunked down almost that amo=
unt
> on a new computer and accessories. And what for? A marginally faster
> processor?
> Anyway, 2003 rolls around and the battery is now $3400, the color we want=
ed
> was immediately at hand, and factory cruise control was added.
> Here we are 4 years later and the car has just a little bit over 87,000
> miles, 50,000 miles on the second set of tires, and no major or minor
> electrical or mechanical problems. Last I heard, $2000 for a battery.
> We have plans to buy another Prius but we don't know when. I can't think =
of
> any reason not to unless there isn't a Toyota service department that's
> trustworthy. If gasoline was free we still would want a Prius. If critics
> managed to somehow drive the retail cost down, that's good too. I do fear
> Toyota will sacrifice fuel efficiency to level the playing field amongst
> their line-up of hybrids.
>=20
> mark_


Posted by mark_digital© on January 24, 2007, 7:38 am
Please log in for more thread options




My real concern was not so much the battery life as the vehicle life.
If the battery last 7-10 years thats quite reasonable. But for toyota
to say the car itself has a life of less than 10 years concerns me. I
am very much a buy and drive till it dies sort of car owner. I have
previously had a manual Mazda 626 which lasted 21 years (1 engine
recondition) and a Mitsubishi Nimbus which is still going strong after
14 years (one replacement automatic transmission and another not so far
away).

For the price of a Prius I would expect a lifetime of at least 16 years
(if not 20). When I calculate the total purchase and lifetime running
costs (petrol, insurance, maintainence, tyres, etc) for a Prius
(assuming lifespan of 10 years) and compare it to a V6 Camry (assuming
lifespan of 16 years) I get an annualised cost for the Prius of
AUD$7500 per annum and for the V6 Camry of AUD$6800 per annum.

That means that even with the much lower petrol costs, the shorter life
makes the Prius a more expensive option. The calculation would be
completely different if the Prius was made to last 16 years (the
annualised cost for the Prius would drop to AUD$6100 per annum).

So is Toyota saying you pay a premium to be environmentally
responsible?

______________________________________________
Sorry, Phil. I can't discuss this with you any further unless you adjust
your newsreader back to indenting replies. Until then, happy motoring.



Posted by Michael Pardee on January 24, 2007, 8:04 am
Please log in for more thread options



My real concern was not so much the battery life as the vehicle life.
If the battery last 7-10 years thats quite reasonable. But for toyota
to say the car itself has a life of less than 10 years concerns me. I
am very much a buy and drive till it dies sort of car owner. I have
previously had a manual Mazda 626 which lasted 21 years (1 engine
recondition) and a Mitsubishi Nimbus which is still going strong after
14 years (one replacement automatic transmission and another not so far
away).

For the price of a Prius I would expect a lifetime of at least 16 years
(if not 20). When I calculate the total purchase and lifetime running
costs (petrol, insurance, maintainence, tyres, etc) for a Prius
(assuming lifespan of 10 years) and compare it to a V6 Camry (assuming
lifespan of 16 years) I get an annualised cost for the Prius of
AUD$7500 per annum and for the V6 Camry of AUD$6800 per annum.

That means that even with the much lower petrol costs, the shorter life
makes the Prius a more expensive option. The calculation would be
completely different if the Prius was made to last 16 years (the
annualised cost for the Prius would drop to AUD$6100 per annum).

So is Toyota saying you pay a premium to be environmentally
responsible?


================================================================

Your question really highlights an area of contention: when is a car at the
end of its useful life? I have mostly bought cars that were at what the
previous owners considered the end of their useful lives for 30 years. My
belief is that 80-100K miles is the sweet spot. At 50K miles it is very hard
to tell how a car has been treated; at 100K it is very hard to hide. Any car
that is in good condition after 100K miles is likely to give at least 100K
more before it is really done. Exceptions are those with time bombs, like
the Taurus automatic transmission and some of the '80s GM ABS. Years seem to
matter most in how the interior holds up - the Royalite plastic suffers
most.

That's the thing we don't know about the Prius. Is there a vital part -
battery, hybrid transaxle, inverter - that will not reliably make it past a
particular milestone? In terms of miles, I am confident the answer is "yes"
because plenty of people have made it into the 200K mile area wthout
trouble. It's the years we don't know about; the model has only been out ten
years now. OTOH, in those ten years no trouble spot has emerged.

There is no "sure thing" in buying cars, but our two 2002 Prius cars have
been the most reliable cars I've ever owned. I've only had two new cars
before and they were both *far* less reliable than the Prius. One of the
Prius we bought new in November 2002 and the other I bought a few months ago
with 103K miles on it. I handed down my 22 year old, 240K mile Volvo to my
son-in-law when I bought the second Prius :-) 'Research and decide' has
served me well.

Mike



Posted by Michael Pardee on January 24, 2007, 7:55 pm
Please log in for more thread options


>
> That's the thing we don't know about the Prius. Is there a vital part -
> battery, hybrid transaxle, inverter - that will not reliably make it past
> a particular milestone? In terms of miles, I am confident the answer is
> "yes"

ah... "yes" meaning "no!" <8^P - - - Mike

> because plenty of people have made it into the 200K mile area wthout
> trouble. It's the years we don't know about; the model has only been out
> ten years now. OTOH, in those ten years no trouble spot has emerged.
>




Posted by Michelle Steiner on January 24, 2007, 12:09 pm
Please log in for more thread options



> My real concern was not so much the battery life as the vehicle life.
> If the battery last 7-10 years thats quite reasonable. But for
> toyota to say the car itself has a life of less than 10 years
> concerns me.

When has any car company officially said what the expected life span of
a car is?

--
Support the troops: Bring them home ASAP.

Similar ThreadsPosted
2008 Toyota Prius July 12, 2007, 12:55 pm
FS: 2006 Toyota Prius 49 k $17,500 April 8, 2008, 2:18 am
Toyota to assemble Prius in US July 10, 2008, 11:51 pm
Toyota Camry Hybrid or Prius???? July 3, 2007, 11:27 am
PICS: Is THIS the next generation Toyota Prius? August 4, 2007, 1:42 am
Toyota Prius - 10th anniversary December 27, 2007, 1:20 pm
FS: 2001 Toyota Prius 124 Kmls $8,250 October 10, 2007, 2:24 pm
Toyota Sirius kits for 2006 Prius February 12, 2007, 1:58 pm
2007 Toyota Prius Hybrid Battery Pack for .99 cents? April 1, 2008, 5:12 am
Toyota announces new recall for NHW20 Prius model for steering defect May 30, 2006, 8:32 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
XML SitemapXML Sitemap