Posted by amdx on January 23, 2015, 1:52 am
http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue120/russian.html
Mikek
Posted by amdx on January 23, 2015, 1:54 am
On 1/22/2015 7:52 PM, amdx wrote:
> http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue120/russian.html
>
> Mikek
Gee, I didn't even get to this Better part.
> http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/ParkhomovEnglish.pdf
Mikek
Posted by mike on January 23, 2015, 4:01 am
On 1/22/2015 5:54 PM, amdx wrote:
> On 1/22/2015 7:52 PM, amdx wrote:
>> http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue120/russian.html
>>
>> Mikek
>
> Gee, I didn't even get to this Better part.
>
>> http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/ParkhomovEnglish.pdf
>
> Mikek
>
Could someone explain the purpose of the heater??
Start with perfect insulation.
Turn on the heater to raise the temperature to that
necessary for the reaction.
Turn off the heater.
The temperature should continue to rise until something
melts.
Now, poke a hole in the insulation and feed a water pipe thru it.
Use a simple feedback control system to throttle the water feed
to maintain whatever operating temperature you choose. You can even
do it manually with enough precision for a go/no go test.
How could that NOT be self-sustaining if it's capable of producing
excess energy?????
The "perfect insulation" is just a concept to define the thought
experiment. Given the large amount of excess energy, one should be
able to achieve adequate insulation quite simply. The accuracy is
irrelevant. Self-sustainability is the proof.
If you're a purist, measure the temperature gradient across the
insulation and apply a heater on the outside of the insulation
with a simple feedback control system to force the gradient to zero.
You don't have to measure stray heat loss, because there won't be any.
This is not rocket science. It's engineering 101. All the magic is
in the reaction medium. Proving, without a doubt, that it works should
be TRIVIAL.
Failure to meet simple, obvious, experimental criteria renders the
whole thing "suspect". You may have a stronger word...
Posted by amdx on January 23, 2015, 4:22 am
On 1/22/2015 10:01 PM, mike wrote:
> On 1/22/2015 5:54 PM, amdx wrote:
>> On 1/22/2015 7:52 PM, amdx wrote:
>>> http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue120/russian.html
>>>
>>> Mikek
>>
>> Gee, I didn't even get to this Better part.
>>
>>> http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/ParkhomovEnglish.pdf
>>
>> Mikek
>>
> Could someone explain the purpose of the heater??
>
I have ask the same question.
They do report it will provide excess heat for a period
(how long is a period) and then they need to turn the heat on again.
I does seem to make sense, but all I have seen, they all need to cycle
the heat.
Another concern of some, is the measurement of the AC power. Why not
just use DC and not worry about phase or harmonics.
Mikek
> Failure to meet simple, obvious, experimental criteria renders the
> whole thing "suspect". You may have a stronger word...
Ya, I've lost confidence after 3 years of following the E-cat.
I'm still hopeful it is real and becomes a household product
or every car has one. Back to steam power! :-)
Mikek
Posted by Morris Dovey on January 23, 2015, 7:33 am
On 1/22/15 10:22 PM, amdx wrote:
> On 1/22/2015 10:01 PM, mike wrote:
>> On 1/22/2015 5:54 PM, amdx wrote:
>>> On 1/22/2015 7:52 PM, amdx wrote:
>>>> http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue120/russian.html
>>>>
>>>> Mikek
>>>
>>> Gee, I didn't even get to this Better part.
>>>
>>>> http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/ParkhomovEnglish.pdf
>>>
>>> Mikek
>>>
>> Could someone explain the purpose of the heater??
>>
>
> I have ask the same question.
There appear to be three parameters that govern ignition/operation:
[1] Temperature of Hâ‚‚ and Ni
[2] Hâ‚‚ pressure
[3] Ni surface area
It also appears that there may be a curve shaped at least somewhat like
k = P * T that describes a locus of (P,T) ignition points.
I looked for information about reaction chamber Hâ‚‚ pressure, but that
was not reported.
> They do report it will provide excess heat for a period
> (how long is a period) and then they need to turn the heat on again.
> I does seem to make sense, but all I have seen, they all need to cycle
> the heat.
> Another concern of some, is the measurement of the AC power. Why not
> just use DC and not worry about phase or harmonics.
> Mikek
>
>> Failure to meet simple, obvious, experimental criteria renders the
>> whole thing "suspect". You may have a stronger word...
>
> Ya, I've lost confidence after 3 years of following the E-cat.
> I'm still hopeful it is real and becomes a household product
> or every car has one. Back to steam power! :-)
> Mikek
--
Morris Dovey
http://www.iedu.com/Solar/
>
> Mikek