Hybrid Car – More Fun with Less Gas

A question about coil winding - Page 13

register ::  Login Password  :: Lost Password?
Posted by Josepi on December 23, 2009, 4:11 am
 


I must say I do like the way the browsers were designed to top post. I hate
scrolling to the bottom and then reading backwards to find the top of their
statements.

Just look at a thread where epople haven't trimmed and the big inserted
lexical levels are hard to pick out and the outside lexical levels are
useless as nobody can count that many right carets to figure out who said
it. The result? People read the previous posts to know who said what,
confusion results in fights from people disagreeing with the wrong people
and just general mass confusion of information, especially with the browsers
meant to download binary files, mainly.

Look at this beautiful format. This is the way every browser I have seen so
far is designed to work. It is always a favourite troll post of the lazy
trolls when losing an argument. "Your format is wrong" makes a good
distraction from the real issue.

Now read very closely in the attached reference posts I may have interlaced
a comment, somewhere...LOL


Your position, at the bottom, assumes that your responses
will be something a reader actually seeks by scrolling past
all your other trolldom utterances.
 I actually scrolled down to see if you had posted something
relevant to the topic. But, no. I was disappointed, but not
particularly surprised.
Go back to the bottom where you are comfortable, more easily
ignored.

Your idiotic predilection for top posting assumes that what you have to
say is important enough that everyone should read it first and then go
thrashing about, scampering through the thread in order to determine
what you were talking about.



Posted by Fred Abse on December 23, 2009, 10:20 am
 


On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:11:59 -0500, Josepi wrote:


<A lot of crap snipped>

Aside from your use of the word "browser". (Microsoft Outlook Express
isn't a browser, it's a mail client / rudimentary news client). there are
no quotation marks (>) against the quoted part of your posting.

That, combined with top posting, makes it almost unintelligible.

Learn to bottom post and quote properly or stay the hell out of
sci.electronics.* groups.

--
"Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference
is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more
durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it."
                                             (Stephen Leacock)

Posted by John Fields on December 23, 2009, 5:56 pm
 



Browsers aren't designed to top post, but simpletons who can't be
bothered (or don't know how) to locate the cursor properly before they
start typing use that as an excuse to justify top posting, a format that
was adopted as the default for email, where it works since the
(generally) two people involved in the exchange know what went before.

In USENET that's not true, and a reader coming across a thread for the
first time wouldn't know what went before and would then, logically, go
to the top of the post and start reading from there in order to traverse
the correct chronological sequence of posts _if_ the earlier posts were
located at the top of the stack.

Just like picking up a book you had never read before, would you expect
chapter 10 to be at the beginning and chapter 1 at the end?
---
  

Troll, huh?
---


My position and that of probably >>99% of USENET is that bottom and
in-line posting is much more efficacious and considerate to readers than
top posting, so your disagreeing with that position is tantamount to
your declaring "Your format is wrong", which hoists you on your own
petard and brands _you_ as the lazy troll losing the argument.
---


You make my point and laugh at any inconvenience I may experience in
trying to search for your maliciously placed nonsense.

Just what I would expect of an immature, self-centered, top-poster.
---


If you consider that formatting to be beautiful, then I suggest you
consider this to be beautiful, as well:

http://www.100abortionpictures.com/Aborted_Baby_Pictures_Abortion_Photos/Enlargement.cfm?ID8

JF

Posted by Josepi on December 23, 2009, 9:15 pm
 

Good thing it was easy to follow for you.
If you have no logical arguments left try insulting everybody.


Browsers aren't designed to top post, but simpletons who can't be
bothered (or don't know how) to locate the cursor properly before they
start typing use that as an excuse to justify top posting, a format that
was adopted as the default for email, where it works since the
(generally) two people involved in the exchange know what went before.

In USENET that's not true, and a reader coming across a thread for the
first time wouldn't know what went before and would then, logically, go
to the top of the post and start reading from there in order to traverse
the correct chronological sequence of posts _if_ the earlier posts were
located at the top of the stack.

Just like picking up a book you had never read before, would you expect
chapter 10 to be at the beginning and chapter 1 at the end?

Troll, huh?

My position and that of probably >>99% of USENET is that bottom and
in-line posting is much more efficacious and considerate to readers than
top posting, so your disagreeing with that position is tantamount to
your declaring "Your format is wrong", which hoists you on your own
petard and brands _you_ as the lazy troll losing the argument.

You make my point and laugh at any inconvenience I may experience in
trying to search for your maliciously placed nonsense.

Just what I would expect of an immature, self-centered, top-poster.
---

Ugh...

If you consider that formatting to be beautiful, then I suggest you
consider this to be beautiful, as well:

http://www.100abortionpictures.com/Aborted_Baby_Pictures_Abortion_Photos/Enlargement.cfm?ID8

JF



Posted by John Fields on December 24, 2009, 1:33 am
 



Following an asshole's trail isn't difficult, all one has to do is
follow the scent of shit.
---


No need to, and even if I had no logical arguments left, why would I
take a page from your book and try to use it to my advantage by
insulting everyone?

Do you think that because you're at your wit's end and have nowhere to
hide that I have no logic left with which to flail you?

If you do, you're severely mistaken and I'll be glad to drag your dick
in the dirt for as long as it takes to get you to understand what a
pathetic little piece of shit you really are.

Here: take some more rope...

JF

This Thread
Bookmark this thread:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
please rate this thread