Posted by Lord Gow333, Dirk Benedict's n on March 30, 2009, 3:24 am
(snip)
>>> I've always been fascinated by Shay's and Climax's
>>>
>>> For those of you laughing right now, get your mind out of the gutter ;-)
>>> The Climax was the name of an obscure locomotive that had the pistons
>>> arranged in a 'V' turning a crankshaft that went lengthwise under the
>>> boiler and then used bevel gears to turn the motion 90 degrees to drive
>>> the wheels)
>>
>> Actually that's a Heisler, "The Bull of the Woods". The Climaxes had
>> cylinders angling down on the sides to a crossways gearbox which then
>> drove the wheels via the centerline driveshaft. Always seemed like an
>> extra step to me. If you ever make it to Corry, Pennsylvania (and really,
>> I don't know why you would) where Climaxes were made the historical
>> society has one as the centerpiece of their museum.
>> http://www.tbscc.com/museum/Tour/image-html/M01a.htm
>> But, that said, really any steam engine is a good steam engine.
>> Personally I'd like to see a Beyer Garrett someday.
>>
>> LG (honestly not trying to be a know-it-all)
> Ah Heisler! That was the third type, I couldn't remember that name. All
> three (Shay's, Climax, and Heisler) were interesting units. As I recall
> all three were for tortuous track of dubious quality (logging or perhaps
> mining?).
Correct on both accounts. Mostly logging as the track were slapped down with
the knowledge that it was only needed until the trees were gone. Mine tracks
tended to last a little longer, but the geared locos still had a good torque
advantage and many made a living dragging ore.
>The geared, independent trucks were for very tight radius.
Tight radius, uneven track, good lugging power... all reasons to go with
gears.
> Actually, I've been to Steam Town near Scranton a couple of times
How 'bout that Big Boy? Did you get to take the shop tour?
>and the Strausburg RR too.
Haven't been there yet. It's on "the list" tho.
>May have to lookup Corry, PA sometime.
There's not a lot there. We first went there looking for a nonexistant
Sheetz convenience store, and when I get down that way I like to grab some
stuff from the Tractor Supply store (mostly for the novelty of having a tax
exempt account in a store 100+ miles from my home). On one of those
occasions I happened upon a historical plaque outside of what was the Climax
factory. A little internet searching led me to the Historical Society Museum
and its locomotive. I bought a book from them describing all the things that
used to be made in Corry, but now it seems to be the same chain stores and
nondescript warehouses as most any other town.
I don't mean to insult them by any means as it's a nice little town to swing
thru if you're nearby, but outside of the museum it's not much of a
destination. They do have one business tho (not even sure what they do)
called Fudpucker Enterprises. Yup, Fudpucker. Hours of enjoyment with a
couple of teenage boys along. :-)
Oh, hey, someone made a web page...
http://www.mylot.com/w/discussions/1245796.aspx
Also on Rt. 6 near Brookland, PA (center east-west about 10 miles below the
NY border) the Pennsylvania Lumber Museum has a 70 ton Shay tucked in one of
their outbuildings.
http://www.lumbermuseum.org/ Once again tho a great museum in the middle of
nowhere. I rampaged thru it quickly a few years ago (had to get back to
work) but I need to get back there and give it a decent browse.
And I'm still looking for the elusive Heisler.
Regardless, happy travels!
LG
--
"The United States is like a giant boiler. When the fire is finally lighted
under it, there is no limit to the power it can generate." - Winston
Churchill
Posted by Neon John on March 27, 2009, 7:54 am
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:05:22 +0000, Tim Jackson
>vaughn wrote:
>> I don't even know where you would start.
>>
>Heating the oil above 100C might be a start.
Back in my college days I worked as a machinist on work scholarship in
the MechE department. One of the profs converted a Harly crankcase
and cylinder assembly into a steam engine. I did some of his machine
work. Regarding water in oil, that is exactly what he did. Not
heating the oil, simply insulating the crankcase so that it quickly
heated up to the steam temperature.
I don't recall the numbers (no interest at the time - just a job) but
I do recall that he got prodigious amounts of power, several hundred
HP, out of the thing running in fairly high pressure steam, tapped
from the university's power plant boiler.
John
Posted by harry on March 27, 2009, 7:45 pm
> >> vaughn wrote:
> >> > >Keeping
> >> >> water out of the lube oil system would be a new and exciting
> >> >> challenge.
> >> > I don't even know where you would start.
> >> Heating the oil above 100C might be a start.
> > Hmmm.... and perhaps that steam could be fed back into the system plus it
> > might have some lubricating qualities.
> Well, piston steam engines *do* use the water/steam in the cylinder to
> lubricate the cylinder wall. But the main bearings and rod bearings are
> another matter.
> Traditional piston steam engines use a crosshead riding on a slide to take
> the lateral forces from the crank pin tending to move the rod from side to
> side. Modern ICE's do it with a taller piston and piston skirt riding along
> the cylinder wall. With a single-acting piston, I'm not sure there would be
> enough steam leaking by the piston seals to lubricate the piston skirt
> (ICE's splash/spray oil up the cylinder wall for this).
> But there's not really enough room in a modern ICE block to put anything
> like a crosshead arrangement.
> daestrom
Re lubrication in steam engines. You have to understand the
difference between "wet" and "dry"steam. Wet steam is at the same
temperature as the water it came from. Hence the moment there is any
heat loss from it condensation occurs. This condensation can damage a
steam engine though it may have some lubricating effect. Dry steam
has no condensation in it.
Ideally steam from a boiler shoould be "dry wet" steam which sounds
mad but just means it is dry steam with no liquid water in it. The
moment it looses some heat condensate appears and the steam is no
longer dry. There is a whole technology exists to overcome this
problem.
To overcome this problem the steam is usually superheated, ie extra
heat is added to the steam after it has come from the boiler.
Virtually all advanced steam engines/turbines need superheated stem.
Oil is injected into the steam to lubricate cylinders in a steam
engine (but not for turbines) If the steam is exhausted to
atmosphere, this is not s problem. If it is condensed and recovered
then it is a major problem as boilers don't like oil in them, the oil
has to be removed which can be a problem.
Posted by Jim Wilkins on March 27, 2009, 7:59 pm
> > >> vaughn wrote:
one or more of the above wrote:
> > Well, piston steam engines *do* use the water/steam in the cylinder to
> > lubricate the cylinder wall. But the main bearings and rod bearings are
> > another matter.
http://www.southernsteamtrains.com/notes/steam%20oil.htm
Posted by vaughn on March 27, 2009, 8:22 pm
> Ideally steam from a boiler shoould be "dry wet" steam which sounds
> mad but just means it is dry steam with no liquid water in it.
I know it as "dry saturated steam"
> The
> moment it looses some heat condensate appears and the steam is no
> longer dry. There is a whole technology exists to overcome this
> problem.
The steam dryers in my background rapidly change the direction of the
steam. Being denser, the water droplets tend to take a slightly different
path, and so can be separated.
> To overcome this problem the steam is usually superheated, ie extra
> heat is added to the steam after it has come from the boiler.
> Virtually all advanced steam engines/turbines need superheated stem.
Unless there has been some change in recent technology, naval nuclear
reactor plants all use saturated steam (no superheat). Neon John can tell
us about commercial nuke plants, but I believe they operate on the same
principle.
Superheating steam does more than just protect equipment from the effects
of water droplets, it can greatly increase the efficiency of a steam plant.
Vaughn.
>>>
>>> For those of you laughing right now, get your mind out of the gutter ;-)
>>> The Climax was the name of an obscure locomotive that had the pistons
>>> arranged in a 'V' turning a crankshaft that went lengthwise under the
>>> boiler and then used bevel gears to turn the motion 90 degrees to drive
>>> the wheels)
>>
>> Actually that's a Heisler, "The Bull of the Woods". The Climaxes had
>> cylinders angling down on the sides to a crossways gearbox which then
>> drove the wheels via the centerline driveshaft. Always seemed like an
>> extra step to me. If you ever make it to Corry, Pennsylvania (and really,
>> I don't know why you would) where Climaxes were made the historical
>> society has one as the centerpiece of their museum.
>> http://www.tbscc.com/museum/Tour/image-html/M01a.htm
>> But, that said, really any steam engine is a good steam engine.
>> Personally I'd like to see a Beyer Garrett someday.
>>
>> LG (honestly not trying to be a know-it-all)
> Ah Heisler! That was the third type, I couldn't remember that name. All
> three (Shay's, Climax, and Heisler) were interesting units. As I recall
> all three were for tortuous track of dubious quality (logging or perhaps
> mining?).