Posted by John Gregory on November 27, 2005, 12:04 pm
Has anyone done a recent "study" that resulted in a determination of what
type of area heater (ceramic, element, oil bath, kerosene, etc) is the most
cost effective?
Posted by m Ransley on November 27, 2005, 7:46 pm
Electric are 100% efficient, non vented Kerosene 100% efficient. You
must do your own study on your local energy costs, everyones area is
different. For me in the midwest Ng is best.
Posted by John Gregory on November 27, 2005, 11:08 pm
I don't think I did a very good job phrasing the question. Surely there are
significant differences among the various heaters. For example: it takes a
1000 kwh electric heater x hours to raise a 12 x 12 room one degree above 68
but only y minutes to maintain that new temperature. An oil bath heater
would be different... more efficient I assume. Cost of energy isn't a factor
in this example; just time. That speaks to efficiency. When cost enters the
equations, the picture turns to effectiveness. That's a different issue.
A diesel tractor may be more effective at cutting vegetation than a Lawn Boy
mower. However, it's not cost effective to cut my lawn with a John Deere.
> Electric are 100% efficient, non vented Kerosene 100% efficient. You
> must do your own study on your local energy costs, everyones area is
> different. For me in the midwest Ng is best.
>
Posted by nicksanspam on November 28, 2005, 12:44 am
>I don't think I did a very good job phrasing the question. Surely there are
>significant differences among the various heaters. For example: it takes a
>1000 kwh electric heater x hours to raise a 12 x 12 room one degree...
What's a 1000 kWh heater?
Nick
Posted by Gordon Richmond on November 28, 2005, 1:09 am
One that burns out after it's consumed 1000 kWh of energy, of course
:>)
Gordon Richmond
> must do your own study on your local energy costs, everyones area is
> different. For me in the midwest Ng is best.
>