Posted by MooseFET on June 1, 2010, 1:23 pm
> > amdx wrote:
> >> Yesterday I heard a radio story about the California School district
> >> spending $20 million to put solar energy in/on schools.
> >> I did a Google search and can't find any info.
> >> The numbers I heard didn't seem cost effective,
> >> so I'm curious.
> >> Anybody know more about it?
> >> Mike
> > Since when does a government institution have to be sane or spend
> > taxpayer money effectively?
> That thought did come to mind. I'm hopeful that we (the people) are taking
> the power that the constitution says we have and telling our reps it's time
> to cut the spending.
It is a NIMBY problem. Everyone wants the government to cut spending
but not on the things they care about. They want more spending on
things in their area. You never see protesters showing up in great
numbers at a ribbon cutting.
> When our reps stop having town meetings because
> the people are angry, that is a change.
A bunch of fake outrage stopped the meetings. Protesters who claimed
to be just average folks but turned out to be party officials made the
meetings stop. This did nothing to reduce spending. It just cut off
communication with the public. It added noise an no signal. The reps
know that those folks yelling
at the meetings were bussed in for the purpose.
> November is coming, please support candidates that believe in the ideas
> that provided a great standard of living in 200 years.
> Limited government, freedom, liberty and property rights.
The right to act and speak is more fundamental than the right to own.
This is why there is no right to own another person.
Posted by amdx on June 1, 2010, 3:02 pm
>>
>>
>> > amdx wrote:
>> >> Yesterday I heard a radio story about the California School district
>> >> spending $20 million to put solar energy in/on schools.
>> >> I did a Google search and can't find any info.
>> >> The numbers I heard didn't seem cost effective,
>> >> so I'm curious.
>> >> Anybody know more about it?
>> >> Mike
>> > Since when does a government institution have to be sane or spend
>> > taxpayer money effectively?
>>
>> That thought did come to mind. I'm hopeful that we (the people) are
>> taking
>> the power that the constitution says we have and telling our reps it's
>> time
>> to cut the spending.
> It is a NIMBY problem. Everyone wants the government to cut spending
> but not on the things they care about. They want more spending on
> things in their area. You never see protesters showing up in great
> numbers at a ribbon cutting.
>> When our reps stop having town meetings because
>> the people are angry, that is a change.
> A bunch of fake outrage stopped the meetings. Protesters who claimed
> to be just average folks but turned out to be party officials made the
> meetings stop. This did nothing to reduce spending. It just cut off
> communication with the public. It added noise an no signal. The reps
> know that those folks yelling
> at the meetings were bussed in for the purpose.
I think your wrong!
The producers are very angry at government overspending.
But we have to many sucking the tit probably don't care.
give me give me.
>> November is coming, please support candidates that believe in the ideas
>> that provided a great standard of living in 200 years.
>> Limited government, freedom, liberty and property rights.
> The right to act and speak is more fundamental than the right to own.
> This is why there is no right to own another person.
Apples and oranges.
Mike
Posted by MooseFET on June 2, 2010, 2:41 am
> >> > amdx wrote:
> >> >> Yesterday I heard a radio story about the California School district
> >> >> spending $20 million to put solar energy in/on schools.
> >> >> I did a Google search and can't find any info.
> >> >> The numbers I heard didn't seem cost effective,
> >> >> so I'm curious.
> >> >> Anybody know more about it?
> >> >> Mike
> >> > Since when does a government institution have to be sane or spend
> >> > taxpayer money effectively?
> >> That thought did come to mind. I'm hopeful that we (the people) are
> >> taking
> >> the power that the constitution says we have and telling our reps it's
> >> time
> >> to cut the spending.
> > It is a NIMBY problem. Everyone wants the government to cut spending
> > but not on the things they care about. They want more spending on
> > things in their area. You never see protesters showing up in great
> > numbers at a ribbon cutting.
> >> When our reps stop having town meetings because
> >> the people are angry, that is a change.
> > A bunch of fake outrage stopped the meetings. Protesters who claimed
> > to be just average folks but turned out to be party officials made the
> > meetings stop. This did nothing to reduce spending. It just cut off
> > communication with the public. It added noise an no signal. The reps
> > know that those folks yelling
> > at the meetings were bussed in for the purpose.
> I think your wrong!
> The producers are very angry at government overspending.
> But we have to many sucking the tit probably don't care.
> give me give me.
On which point?
The folks showing up at the health care town-halls were bussed in
and were misrepresenting themselves. There was video of the
buses and several cases where they followed up and proved that
they were in fact party operatives.
People may be angery at the government for spending too much
but very few are willing to have the spending on their pet things
reduced.
> > The right to act and speak is more fundamental than the right to own.
> > This is why there is no right to own another person.
> Apples and oranges.
Huh?
Posted by Robert Baer on June 2, 2010, 5:59 am
amdx wrote:
>> amdx wrote:
>>> Yesterday I heard a radio story about the California School district
>>> spending $20 million to put solar energy in/on schools.
>>> I did a Google search and can't find any info.
>>> The numbers I heard didn't seem cost effective,
>>> so I'm curious.
>>> Anybody know more about it?
>>> Mike
>> Since when does a government institution have to be sane or spend
>> taxpayer money effectively?
>
> That thought did come to mind. I'm hopeful that we (the people) are taking
> the power that the constitution says we have and telling our reps it's time
> to cut the spending. When our reps stop having town meetings because
> the people are angry, that is a change.
> November is coming, please support candidates that believe in the ideas
> that provided a great standard of living in 200 years.
> Limited government, freedom, liberty and property rights.
> Mike
> That property rights is a getting to be big. Getting so you can't dig a hole
> on
> your own property and in PC Fl. It's is a $000 fine to cut down a pine tree
> over a certain diameter, on YOUR* property.
> Government and the environmentalist are out of control.
>
> * If you can call it yours, try not paying that rent.
> Also known as property tax.
> end of rant.
>
>
Absolute *CHECK* !!
Posted by JosephKK on June 9, 2010, 10:06 am
>Yesterday I heard a radio story about the California School district
>spending $20 million to put solar energy in/on schools.
>I did a Google search and can't find any info.
>The numbers I heard didn't seem cost effective,
>so I'm curious.
> Anybody know more about it?
> Mike
Stick "CREB" into the search engine.
> >> Yesterday I heard a radio story about the California School district
> >> spending $20 million to put solar energy in/on schools.
> >> I did a Google search and can't find any info.
> >> The numbers I heard didn't seem cost effective,
> >> so I'm curious.
> >> Anybody know more about it?
> >> Mike
> > Since when does a government institution have to be sane or spend
> > taxpayer money effectively?
> That thought did come to mind. I'm hopeful that we (the people) are taking
> the power that the constitution says we have and telling our reps it's time
> to cut the spending.