Hybrid Car – More Fun with Less Gas

Can anyone beat 20W CFLs @ 8 pence easch ? - Page 5

register ::  Login Password  :: Lost Password?
please rate
this thread
Posted by Eeyore on May 18, 2009, 11:24 pm
 


Rich Grise wrote:


have

was

Bizarre.



You can easily get 12V CFLs.

Graham


Posted by Rich Grise on May 19, 2009, 1:37 pm
 
On Tue, 19 May 2009 04:24:51 +0100, Eeyore wrote:

Yeah, but I don't _LIKE_ CFL's. And I can't imagine one fitting in any of
my sockets, and an ordinary 1813 is about 75 cents.

Cheers!
Rich


Posted by Eeyore on May 19, 2009, 3:08 pm
 

Rich Grise wrote:


What don't you like about them ?

Graham


Posted by Rich Grise on May 19, 2009, 3:57 pm
 On Tue, 19 May 2009 20:08:12 +0100, Eeyore wrote:

1. Short life.
2. Inconvenient size/shape.
3. The warmingists want to shove them down our throats.
4. The mercury - well, not so much the mercury itself - heck, when we were
   kids, we used to  play with liquid mercury - but the total hypocrisy
   when the pushers ignore even the possibility of mercury in the
   landfills, not that I'm an antimercury type. What the hell, ask
   anybody - I'm already mad as a hatter! ;-D
5. Why not xenon?

Thanks,
Rich


Posted by Don Klipstein on May 19, 2009, 8:53 pm
 

  As an active ingredient to produce shortwave UV in fluorescent lamps?

  For one, they have not gotten the UV to be produced as efficiently.

  For another, the main shortwave UV emission of xenon is 147 nm, compared
to 254 nm for low pressure mercury.  The Stokes loss is much worse with
the shorter wavelength, and the shorter wavelength is harsher on
phosphors.

  Xenon fluorescent lamps have been made, but they only sold well where
intolerance for mercury and/or ability to operate over a wider temperature
range outweighed their lower efficiency - until white LEDs became more
efficient than xenon fluorescent lamps.

 - Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)

This Thread
Bookmark this thread:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date