Hybrid Car – More Fun with Less Gas

Cold Fusion Proven True by U.S. Navy Researchers - Will Suppression of this Science be Repeated?

register ::  Login Password  :: Lost Password?
Posted by rpautrey2 on May 8, 2009, 4:41 pm
Originally published March 25 2009

Cold Fusion Proven True by U.S. Navy Researchers - Will Suppression of
this Science be Repeated?
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) The world owes Fleischmann and Pons a huge apology: The
cold fusion technology they announced in 1989 -- which was blasted by
arrogant hot fusion scientists as a fraud -- has been proven true once
again by U.S. Navy Researchers. In papers presented at this year's
American Chemical Society meeting, scientist Pamela Mosier-Boss
presented data supporting the reality of cold fusion, declaring the
report, "the first scientific report of highly energetic neutrons from
low-energy nuclear reactions."

Technically, it's not the first report at all, however. It might be
the five-hundredth report, given how many people have been working on
cold fusion since 1989 in laboratories across the world. Following the
politically-motivated assassination of cold fusion credibility in
1989, the cold fusion movement went underground, renaming itself to
LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions). As LENR, cold fusion has been
proven true in literally thousands of experiments conducted over the
past two decades.

I first went public with the true story about the conspiracy against
cold fusion in 1998. It described this classic conspiracy against a
new technology, schemed up by desperate defenders of old technology --
hot fusion researchers who, after hundreds of billions of dollars in
research money, have yet to produce a single sustainable hot fusion
reaction that produces more energy than it consumes. The arrogant hot
fusion researchers have the same snooty attitude as cancer
researchers: "Just give us another billion dollars," they say, "and
we'll find a cure!"

It's been the same story for nearly three decades now, and hot fusion
still doesn't work. A working cold fusion unit, however, can be built
on a kitchen countertop for less than $,000, and it doesn't require a
doctorate in physics to pull it off, either. It is precisely this
simplicity that offends the arrogant hot fusion pushers who act much
like medical doctors in the vicious defense of their territory.

Cold fusion applications
Cold fusion isn't some magical free energy machine. It produces excess
heat, but slowly. So don't go thinking this is some kind of Mr. Fusion
device that you can feed some banana peels and expect to get clean
electricity out the other end.

Rather, cold fusion converts mass to heat energy, slowly losing a bit
of mass through very low-energy nuclear reactions (hence the LENR
name) that generate excess heat. In practical terms, cold fusion
produces hot water.

And why is hot water useful? Because with hot water, you can produce
steam. Steam turns turbines that generate electricity. This is how
coal power plants work, too, except they're burning coal to heat water
instead of using cold fusion. Conventional nuke plants work the same
way, too, using much higher-energy nuclear reactions to heat vast
amounts of water that drive electricity-generating turbines.

So heating water with cold fusion is a big deal. If the technology can
be scaled up and applied properly, it could spell an end to the era of
dirty coal power plants.

And that, friends, could mean a very big deal for reducing CO2
emissions and avoiding a worsening of global warming. It will even
help global warming skeptics, too, because even if you don't believe
global warming is real, the climate still changes on you. Mother
Nature can't be debated. It just reacts.

Whether you recognize the reality of global warming or not, cold
fusion technology could reduce air pollution due to coal power plant
emissions. Coal power plants are the No. 1 source of mercury pollution
on our planet, in case you didn't know. That's because burning coal
spews mercury into the air, which then contaminates oceans and land
masses, contaminating the world with mercury.

(Perhaps there are mercury skeptics who do not believe coal power
plants spew mercury at all, or that mercury is safe for human
consumption. The mercury skeptics are probably dentists, come to think
of it...)

No radioactive waste
Cold fusion, by the way, does not produce radioactive waste. So it's
not like a world full of cold fusion power plants would create yet
another radioactive waste problem. It might cause a shortage of
palladium, though, which is one of the metals typically used in cold
fusion devices.

Some of the more astute readers of this website will probably figure
out that investing in palladium futures ahead of any widespread
production of cold fusion devices would no doubt be extremely
profitable. But that kind of product rollout is likely years away, at

And that's assuming that this latest round of cold fusion
announcements won't get clobbered yet again by the hot fusion
conspirators. I'm half expecting an updated news announcement in a day
or two, with a headline like, "U.S. Navy Retracts Cold Fusion
Announcement, Scientists Accused of Fraud" or some such nonsense. If
you see such a headline, remember what you're reading here, and you'll
know it's all been manipulated to erase the reality of cold fusion
from the sphere of public knowledge.

Cold fusion, after all, could revolutionize the energy industry and
spell doom for coal and natural gas. I know a bunch of executives in
Wyoming who are shaking in their (insulated) boots right now at the
thought of cold fusion sidelining natural gas.

Authors' Quotes on Cold Fusion
Below, you'll find selected quotes from noted authors on the subject
of Cold Fusion. Feel free to quote these in your own work provided you
give proper credit to both the original author quoted here and this
NaturalNews page.

Nowhere are the resistance to and promise of a new energy technology
more dramatically revealed than those of the case of cold fusion. This
well-researched approach has the potential of reversing much of the
pollution while turning the interests of the energy monopolies upside
down. Unfortunately, even the environmentalists haven't yet given new
energy alternatives a fair look. The cold fusion Revolution: The
unfolding cold fusion saga has provided us with an illustrious
thirteen year history that would make the suppression of Tesla seem
like a school exercise.
- Reinheriting the Earth: Awakening to Sustainable Solutions and
Greater Truths by Brian O'Leary
- Available on Amazon.com

The coup de grace was delivered to cold fusion when the US House
committee formed to examine the claims for cold fusion came down on
the side of the skeptics. 'Evidence for the discovery of a new nuclear
process termed cold fusion is not persuasive,' said its report. 'No
special programmes to establish cold fusion research centers or to
support new efforts to find cold fusion are justified.'
- Alternative Science: Challenging the Myths of the Scientific
Establishment by Richard Milton
- Available on Amazon.com

Cold fusion The fusion of hydrogen atoms into helium at room
temperature. In 1989 two scientists announced that they had produced
cold fusion in their laboratory, an achievement that if true would
have meant a virtually unlimited cheap energy supply for humanity.
When other scientists were unable to reproduce their results, the
scientific community concluded that the original experiment had been
- The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs
to Know by E. D. Hirsch, Joseph F. Kett, James Trefil
- Available on Amazon.com

Thus within two months of its original announcement, cold fusion had
been dealt a fatal blow by two of the world's most prestigious nuclear
research centres, each receiving millions of pounds a year to fund
atomic research. The measure of MIT's success in killing off cold
fusion is that still today, the US Department of Energy refuses to
fund any research into it while the US Patent Office relies on the MIT
report to refuse any patents based on or relating to cold fusion
processes even though hundreds have been submitted.
- Alternative Science: Challenging the Myths of the Scientific
Establishment by Richard Milton
- Available on Amazon.com

Patent Office of any application mentioning cold fusion; 3)
Suppression of research on the phenomenon in government laboratories;
4) Citation of cold fusion as "pathological science" or "fraud" in
numerous books and articles critical of cold fusion in general, and of
Fleischmann and Pons in particular." One of the DOE panel members,
Prof. Steven Koonin of Caltech (and now Provost there), said, "My
conclusion is that the experiments are just wrong and that we are
suffering from the incompetence and delusion of Doctors Pons and
- Reinheriting the Earth: Awakening to Sustainable Solutions and
Greater Truths by Brian O'Leary
- Available on Amazon.com

Six months after cold fusion was announced, the American Department of
Energy denounced it. In Japan, the people who are considered
authorities blindly emulated the attitude of the Americans, as they
invariably do, and they too pontificated against cold fusion. Perhaps
it was inevitable that most people would assume the claims are cock
and bull nonsense. In keeping with the tide of the times, countless
books and articles have been published attacking cold fusion. The very
act of researching cold fusion has become scandalous.
- Alternative Science: Challenging the Myths of the Scientific
Establishment by Richard Milton
- Available on Amazon.com

Equally illuminating were the remarks of Professor John Huizenga, who
was co-chairman of the US Department of Energy's panel on cold fusion
and who came down against the reality of the process. In a recent book
on the subject, Professor Huizenga observed that 'The world's
scientific institutions have probably now squandered between $0 and
$00 million on an idea that was absurd to begin with.' The question
is, what were his principal reasons for rejecting cold fusion.
- Alternative Science: Challenging the Myths of the Scientific
Establishment by Richard Milton
- Available on Amazon.com

This was perhaps the high-water mark of cold fusion. Scores of
organisations over the world were actively working to replicate cold
fusion in their laboratories, and although many reported difficulties
a decent number reported success. And by the end of April, Fleischmann
and Pons were standing before the US House Science, Space and
Technology committee asking for a cool $5 million to fund a centre
for cold fusion research at Utah University. Then things began to go
- Alternative Science: Challenging the Myths of the Scientific
Establishment by Richard Milton
- Available on Amazon.comBuzz up!1 vote


All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is
protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole
responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard
products and earns no money from the recommendation of products.
NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes
only and should not be construed as professional advice from any
licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for
the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of
this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml

Posted by Eeyore on May 8, 2009, 7:04 pm

rpautrey2 wrote:

No it hasn't been.

This Thread
Bookmark this thread:
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
please rate this thread