Posted by harry k on May 18, 2012, 3:03 pm
> harry k wrote:
> >> Vaughn wrote:
> >>> 5/17/2012 2:27 PM, News wrote:
> >>>> Vaughn wrote:
> >>>>>> into the manufacturing side now. It is nice you
> >>>>>> are getting it.
> >>>>> But you aren't"getting it".
> >>>> I did get it. I read the Tata press release. You know, about this
> >>>> car you said would never work because you did some sums.
> >>> Yet again, you trimmed my post and "answered" without addressing a
> >>> single thing of substance. It's obvious you are back to your
> >>> trolling ways, name-calling and provoking whilst never addressing
> >>> the real issues.
> >>> Please notice that 1) After a decade of "progress" you can't yet
> >>> point to a single AirCar in customer's hands
> >> You must read the press release by Tata. Also it works. You said it
> >> would never and did some sums.
> > It didn't. That is why Tata is testing an IC engine fueled by
> > hydrocarbons.
> Have you read the press release and told Tata you are wrong?
Apparently _you_ haven't read anything about what they are doing even
hafter haveing been told by everyone here it is not an "air car" - it
is running on liquid fuel and
that information is in the Tata cite.
Harry K
Posted by News on May 18, 2012, 10:03 pm
harry k wrote:
>> harry k wrote:
>>>> Vaughn wrote:
>>>>> 5/17/2012 2:27 PM, News wrote:
>>>>>> Vaughn wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> into the manufacturing side now. It is nice you
>>>>>>>> are getting it.
>>
>>>>>>> But you aren't"getting it".
>>
>>>>>> I did get it. I read the Tata press release. You know, about this
>>>>>> car you said would never work because you did some sums.
>>
>>>>> Yet again, you trimmed my post and "answered" without addressing a
>>>>> single thing of substance. It's obvious you are back to your
>>>>> trolling ways, name-calling and provoking whilst never addressing
>>>>> the real issues.
>>>>> Please notice that 1) After a decade of "progress" you can't yet
>>>>> point to a single AirCar in customer's hands
>>
>>>> You must read the press release by Tata. Also it works. You said it
>>>> would never and did some sums.
>>
>>> It didn't. That is why Tata is testing an IC engine fueled by
>>> hydrocarbons.
>>
>> Have you read the press release and told Tata you are wrong?
> Apparently _you_ haven't read anything about what they are doing even
Please understand what is happening. This may be trying for you, but please
try.
Posted by harry k on May 17, 2012, 9:32 pm
> Vaughn wrote:
> > On 5/16/2012 9:26 AM, News wrote:
> >>> Now Tata might have a market-ready product "over the coming years".
> >>> Tell us again News, what's changed over the last ten years?
> > This is your thread News. You started the discussion. Are you
> > serious about discussing this or are you just trolling again?
> I never troll. I inform you of events.
Oddly, those "events" never come to fruition. Do you have any
explanations for that?
BTW. What Tata is doing has zippo todo with an "Air Car". Their
project is a different animal entirely. While I enjoy pointing out to
you, the idiot, facts such as that, I know ithey never penetrate that
stupidity barrier of yours.
Harry K
Posted by News on May 17, 2012, 9:51 pm
harry k wrote:
>> Vaughn wrote:
>>> On 5/16/2012 9:26 AM, News wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>> Now Tata might have a market-ready product "over the coming
>>>>> years".
>>
>>>>> Tell us again News, what's changed over the last ten years?
>>
>>> This is your thread News. You started the discussion. Are you
>>> serious about discussing this or are you just trolling again?
>>
>> I never troll. I inform you of events.
> Oddly, those "events" never come to fruition.
The cars works of course beyond doubt, despite senile people doing sums
saying it will not. It looks they are to make it. Read Tata. Amazing eh?
Posted by harry k on May 18, 2012, 4:23 am
> harry k wrote:
> >> Vaughn wrote:
> >>> On 5/16/2012 9:26 AM, News wrote:
> >>>>> Now Tata might have a market-ready product "over the coming
> >>>>> years".
> >>>>> Tell us again News, what's changed over the last ten years?
> >>> This is your thread News. You started the discussion. Are you
> >>> serious about discussing this or are you just trolling again?
> >> I never troll. I inform you of events.
> > Oddly, those "events" never come to fruition.
> The cars works of course beyond doubt, despite senile people doing sums
> saying it will not. It looks they are to make it. Read Tata. Amazing eh?
Having a comprehension problem are you? What part of "It isn't an air
car" do you not understand? It runs on an IC engine fueled with
hydrocarbons. The
only thing the "air thingy' has to do with it is for temporary power
boosts.
As such, no one said anything at all, pro or con on whether it will
work.
Now for your asinine "air car". That has been proven (and was from
the star) to be an unworkable, impractical pipe dream. Yes, it would
run...for very short distances and with a very high energy input and
even higher energy losses.
Harry K
XML site map
> >> Vaughn wrote:
> >>> 5/17/2012 2:27 PM, News wrote:
> >>>> Vaughn wrote:
> >>>>>> into the manufacturing side now. It is nice you
> >>>>>> are getting it.
> >>>>> But you aren't"getting it".
> >>>> I did get it. I read the Tata press release. You know, about this
> >>>> car you said would never work because you did some sums.
> >>> Yet again, you trimmed my post and "answered" without addressing a
> >>> single thing of substance. It's obvious you are back to your
> >>> trolling ways, name-calling and provoking whilst never addressing
> >>> the real issues.
> >>> Please notice that 1) After a decade of "progress" you can't yet
> >>> point to a single AirCar in customer's hands
> >> You must read the press release by Tata. Also it works. You said it
> >> would never and did some sums.
> > It didn't. That is why Tata is testing an IC engine fueled by
> > hydrocarbons.
> Have you read the press release and told Tata you are wrong?