Posted by News on May 18, 2012, 12:11 pm
harry k wrote:
>> harry k wrote:
>>>> Vaughn wrote:
>>>>> On 5/16/2012 9:26 AM, News wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>>> Now Tata might have a market-ready product "over the coming
>>>>>>> years".
>>
>>>>>>> Tell us again News, what's changed over the last ten years?
>>
>>>>> This is your thread News. You started the discussion. Are you
>>>>> serious about discussing this or are you just trolling again?
>>
>>>> I never troll. I inform you of events.
>>
>>> Oddly, those "events" never come to fruition.
>>
>> The cars works of course beyond doubt, despite senile people doing
>> sums saying it will not. It looks they are to make it. Read Tata.
>> Amazing eh?
> Having a comprehension problem are you? What part of "It isn't an air
> car" do you not understand? It runs on an IC engine fueled with
> hydrocarbons.
And soemtinme only 100% air. Have you told Tata they are wrong?
> The
> only thing the "air thingy' has to do with it is for temporary power
> boosts.
> As such, no one said anything at all, pro or con on whether it will
> work.
You all said it would not work and Tata should know this, so you should
connect them. They have done all the testing and they thought it works.
<snip tripe>
Posted by harry k on May 18, 2012, 3:05 pm
> harry k wrote:
> >> harry k wrote:
> >>>> Vaughn wrote:
> >>>>> On 5/16/2012 9:26 AM, News wrote:
> >>>>>>> Now Tata might have a market-ready product "over the coming
> >>>>>>> years".
> >>>>>>> Tell us again News, what's changed over the last ten years?
> >>>>> This is your thread News. You started the discussion. Are you
> >>>>> serious about discussing this or are you just trolling again?
> >>>> I never troll. I inform you of events.
> >>> Oddly, those "events" never come to fruition.
> >> The cars works of course beyond doubt, despite senile people doing
> >> sums saying it will not. It looks they are to make it. Read Tata.
> >> Amazing eh?
> > Having a comprehension problem are you? What part of "It isn't an air
> > car" do you not understand? It runs on an IC engine fueled with
> > hydrocarbons.
> And soemtinme only 100% air. Have you told Tata they are wrong?
> > The
> > only thing the "air thingy' has to do with it is for temporary power
> > boosts.
> > As such, no one said anything at all, pro or con on whether it will
> > work.
> You all said it would not work and Tata should know this, so you should
> connect them. They have done all the testing and they thought it works.
> <snip tripe>
Seems I was right about the 'stupidity barrier'.
Harry K
Posted by News on May 18, 2012, 10:03 pm
harry k wrote:
>> harry k wrote:
>>>> harry k wrote:
>>>>>> Vaughn wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/16/2012 9:26 AM, News wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>>>>> Now Tata might have a market-ready product "over the coming
>>>>>>>>> years".
>>
>>>>>>>>> Tell us again News, what's changed over the last ten years?
>>
>>>>>>> This is your thread News. You started the discussion. Are you
>>>>>>> serious about discussing this or are you just trolling again?
>>
>>>>>> I never troll. I inform you of events.
>>
>>>>> Oddly, those "events" never come to fruition.
>>
>>>> The cars works of course beyond doubt, despite senile people doing
>>>> sums saying it will not. It looks they are to make it. Read Tata.
>>>> Amazing eh?
>>
>>> Having a comprehension problem are you? What part of "It isn't an
>>> air car" do you not understand? It runs on an IC engine fueled with
>>> hydrocarbons.
>>
>> And soemtinme only 100% air. Have you told Tata they are wrong?
>>
>>> The
>>> only thing the "air thingy' has to do with it is for temporary power
>>> boosts.
>>
>>> As such, no one said anything at all, pro or con on whether it will
>>> work.
>>
>> You all said it would not work and Tata should know this, so you
>> should connect them. They have done all the testing and they thought
>> it works.
>>
>> <snip tripe>
>
> Seems
<snip tripe>
Posted by harry k on May 19, 2012, 3:44 am
> harry k wrote:
> >> You all said it would not work and Tata should know this, so you
> >> should connect them. They have done all the testing and they thought
> >> it works.
> >> <snip tripe>
> > Seems I was right about the 'stupidity barrier'.
> So why do you keep trying. You are talking to a brick, it seems.
As to 'why'. I enjoy jabbing a pin in his ass - at least he feels it.
I suspect a brick has more sense than 'news'.
Harry K
Posted by News on May 19, 2012, 8:08 am
harry k wrote:
>> harry k wrote:
>>>> You all said it would not work and Tata should know this, so you
>>>> should connect them. They have done all the testing and they
>>>> thought it works.
>>
>>>> <snip tripe>
>>
>>> Seems I was right about the 'stupidity barrier'.
>>
>> So why do you keep trying. You are talking to a brick, it seems.
>
> As to 'why'. I enjoy jabbing a pin in his ass - at least he feels it.
>
> I suspect a brick has more sense than 'news'.
>
> Harry K
What a pair of nuts!
XML site map
>>>> Vaughn wrote:
>>>>> On 5/16/2012 9:26 AM, News wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>>> Now Tata might have a market-ready product "over the coming
>>>>>>> years".
>>
>>>>>>> Tell us again News, what's changed over the last ten years?
>>
>>>>> This is your thread News. You started the discussion. Are you
>>>>> serious about discussing this or are you just trolling again?
>>
>>>> I never troll. I inform you of events.
>>
>>> Oddly, those "events" never come to fruition.
>>
>> The cars works of course beyond doubt, despite senile people doing
>> sums saying it will not. It looks they are to make it. Read Tata.
>> Amazing eh?
> Having a comprehension problem are you? What part of "It isn't an air
> car" do you not understand? It runs on an IC engine fueled with
> hydrocarbons.