On Jul 1, 12:42am, wmbjkREM...@citlink.net wrote:
> wrote:
> >On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:43:13 -0700, wmbjkREM...@citlink.net wrote:
> >>In discussions about the difficulty of making alternative energy
> >>"pay", people frequently neglect to consider the cost of connecting
> >>new homes to the grid. Those hookups are often counted as being free,
> >>despite the fact that they tend to be heavily subsidized by current
> >>ratepayers. The true cost ranges from very little in built-up areas,
> >>to quite a lot in rural areas. Here's a recent article which points
> >>out some of the ramifications of removing subsidies and letting growth
> >>pay for itself.
> >Here in Downeast Maine, the cost for grid extension for me would have
> >been $.25/ft for lines on poles and $/ft for underground lines after
> >*I* prepared the trench and conduit. And if the underground portion
> >was over a certain distance, and additional $400-$800 for
> >transformers at each end.
> >Being 7000' from the powerline, with 2,000' of that to be underground,
> >it was very obvious that an off-grid solution would be less expensive
> >from day 1.
> Just out of curiosity, did you consider any otherwise similar
> properties that were easier to connect to the grid? If so, could you
> put a number on the difference in price?
> Wayne
Gee wayne you have really done it well this time. Seems that your
cowardice has some of your friends wondering what you really are
about. At least one has found your antics to have become, in his own
words, "God awful painful to watch". He was even so kind as to send me
your site.
So, would you like to post your site? Or would you like me to post it
for you?
Who you are dealing with. wayne made this challenge, then disgraced
himself as the coward of all time.
Jun 19, 7:03 am, wmbjkREM...@citlink.net wrote:
> I think so, which is why I post the link, and you're ashamed to. Feel
> free to show us all how brave you are though, nitwit. If you really
> think that your cockamamie quotes reflect well on you, then I dare you
> to add the link to all your posts.
My response was:
Oooo, now I'm really scared. It seems that you really are blind as I
have not removed the link from this discussion at any point. But as
you like the idea of a challenge I'll tell you what, You put your
original site up for the world to see with a prominently displayed
link to my site and I will include your link on the links page on my
site. Not likely is it. It would mean that you would have to go
through all the fuss of claiming that if any one else says you numbers
don't add up you will remove your site and then posting a bogus post
to say that your numbers don't add up so you can look hard done by.
COMING SOON - The disection of waynes site. A blow by blow expose of
fraudulent system.
wmbjkREMOVE@citlink.net writes:
>Here's a recent article which points out some of the
>ramifications of removing subsidies and letting growth pay for
>itself.
>http://www.kingmandailyminer.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1&ArticleID8767&TMH467.33
Hello, shouldn't the local pols be worried about *filling* the existing
houses, not building more?
The Finest Government Money Can Buy, I guess.
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
XML site map
> >On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:43:13 -0700, wmbjkREM...@citlink.net wrote:
> >>In discussions about the difficulty of making alternative energy
> >>"pay", people frequently neglect to consider the cost of connecting
> >>new homes to the grid. Those hookups are often counted as being free,
> >>despite the fact that they tend to be heavily subsidized by current
> >>ratepayers. The true cost ranges from very little in built-up areas,
> >>to quite a lot in rural areas. Here's a recent article which points
> >>out some of the ramifications of removing subsidies and letting growth
> >>pay for itself.
> >Here in Downeast Maine, the cost for grid extension for me would have
> >been $.25/ft for lines on poles and $/ft for underground lines after
> >*I* prepared the trench and conduit. And if the underground portion
> >was over a certain distance, and additional $400-$800 for
> >transformers at each end.
> >Being 7000' from the powerline, with 2,000' of that to be underground,
> >it was very obvious that an off-grid solution would be less expensive
> >from day 1.
> Just out of curiosity, did you consider any otherwise similar
> properties that were easier to connect to the grid? If so, could you
> put a number on the difference in price?
> Wayne