Creating a LENR Newsgroup - Page 7

 On 1/28/2012 2:33 PM, Mho wrote:

 >  His funding and job was cut. There won't be a next year, apparently.
 >
 > No need for name calling. State your case.

  I don't see any name calling.
                  Mikek

  Well if the shoe fits....

-----------
  I don't see any name calling.
                  Mikek

 On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:33:28 -0600, amdx wrote:


What is wrong with alt.energy.nuclear ?

It has very low traffic, so I don't see any need for a subgroup,
like alt.energy.nuclear.lner

When I search about nuclear news, I start with alt.energy.nuclear
or similar (why otherwise ?).

The only reason to create e new NG is to "forget" the archived
history, unless you like to add, every year, new titles in your
newsgroup reader. Or your scope is to create an "exclusive" club,
without connections with other nuclear matters, like you would
do with a religion, very you w'ont discuss with other faiths ?

--
Roberto Deboni

[Messaggio Usenet via Tiscali su text.giganews.com. Se leggete via Web
il sottoscritto informa che non conosce o partecipa al sito/forum Web.]

 On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:06:38 -0600, Roberto Deboni DMIsr wrote:


IIRC, sci.physics.fusion was created for cold fusion discussion right
after P&F discovered cold fusion.

Idiot trolls killed all discussion, insulted the researchers right out of
the group, and the group was abandoned.

 On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:33:56 -0600, Marvin the Martian


You misspelled, "Grandiose claims, never backed up by the tiniest
shred of evidence, and the consequent ridicule, led the
hype-mongers to adjourn to their own web boards where they could
lie as much as they liked and never be mocked, while the sane
people lost interest and wandered off."
 

--
Bill Snyder  [This space unintentionally left blank]