Posted by Ron Rosenfeld on February 27, 2010, 3:12 am
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:58:28 GMT, Johnny B Good
>> You wrote about only being able to adjust your SmartUPS sensitivity from
>> the software. That's true on my APC UPS's also, but the software is
>> included with the units; and I'm pretty certain is freely downloadable from
>> the APC web site.
> The software itself isn't the issue, it's a weird problem in the
>SmartUPS 2000 that prevents the APC software from doing anything more
>than allow the installer to detect I've got it connected. Once
>installed, it cannot make sense of the responses it gets back from that
>UPS.
> The same software has no problems whatsoever with the smaller SmartUPS
>700 which can be set to low senstivity without using the software anyway
>(it has a button on the back which allows you to toggle between hi, mid
>and lo sensitivity. The SmartUPS 2000 can only be switched between hi
>and mid sensitivity on the rear panel dipswitch with the low sensitivity
>option only being available via the 'funny' serial port and the
>management software.
> I can access most of the monitoring functions using an open source APC
>monitoring program but the problem seems to be that any attempts to make
>any changes of settings fail to be stored. It's as if the nvram area has
>been write protected. I suspect it may have been misprogrammed in the
>past (I'd bought it secondhand at a radioham rally some years ago sans
>its battery box, hence the external battery pack of four 25AH SLAs and
>eight, in two banks, used 7AH SLAs of indifferent capacity being 'parked
>to maintain condition' to provide additional, if uncertain, capacity).
> Other than this strange software issue, the UPS works exactly as
>intended. The only reason I even bothered wiring up a 'funny' rs232
>adapter cable to run the software was because I needed to desensitise it
>even further than the dipswitch option allowed. If I could get my hands
>on a controller chip from a scrapped Smartups 1200, 1700 or 2000, I
>think I can restore it back to full functionality again.
>> Good luck with your tinkering.
>> --ron
> Thanks, I think I'm going to need every bit of luck I can grab onto to
>sort this one out. ;-)
>--
>Regards, John.
Oh, I see. It's not a generic thing with SmartUPS2000's; it's an issue
with your particular unit. Well, if you got it at a hamfest, you probably
got it for a pretty good price, I hope, so it's worthwhile to put up with
its idiosyncracies.
And I suspect you'll get things sorted out.
--ron
Posted by Neon John on February 25, 2010, 9:08 am
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:42:32 -0600, "Daniel who wants to know"
>The active PFC normally has nothing to do with not working on MSW power. I
>have a GE electronic fluorescent ballast (GE-232-MAX-H) with active PFC that
>is rated to run on anything from 100-300 volts AC and not only will it work
>on MSW power but it works on straight 160V DC power too. (from the DC rail
>before the output FETs on an MSW inverter.
Active PFC has everything to do with a device not working on an MSW
inverter. In fact, that's one of only a couple of reasons why a
device will not work on MSW. The other reason is that the device
relies too much on the peak value of the AC sinusoid. Some microwave
ovens are offenders here.
Just off the top of my head I can name at least 10 active PFC
architectures and there are invariably those that I don't know about.
I can show you one that for sure will NOT work on anything but a low
distortion sine wave. The reason that I know is that I designed it.
http://www.neon-john.net/Induction/PFC.htm
No, I didn't intentionally design it not to work with non-sinusoids.
The controller chip that I selected determined that. I've since
switched techniques since my product needs to be able to run on
inverters and cheap generators.
-----------
To the original poster. Does your power supply use a 3 wire cord? If
it does then try connecting the power supply to the inverter without
the ground wire. Use a 2 to 3 wire adapter, a 2 wire extension cord
or something similar.
I've run into Dell power bricks that won't run on an inverter and the
problem was with the inverter neutral and not the active PFC.
Specifically, the problem is in the inverter and its lack of an earth
ground.
Most inexpensive inverters have the neutral sitting about 60 volts
negative with respect to earth ground. That makes for a much simpler
and cheaper output stage. The problem is that the Dell power brick
doesn't like seeing any potential between ground and neutral. In the
instances where this problem has arisen (either with my computer or
those of people whom I've helped over the net), removing the
connection to the ground pin has solved the problem.
I don't advocate cutting the ground pin on general principle. The
easiest solution is to use a 2 to 3 wire adapter plug. You can also go
into the inverter and remove the ground wire, as it has no meaning in
this context.
John
Posted by Ron Rosenfeld on February 25, 2010, 11:47 am
>On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:42:32 -0600, "Daniel who wants to know"
>>The active PFC normally has nothing to do with not working on MSW power. I
>>have a GE electronic fluorescent ballast (GE-232-MAX-H) with active PFC that
>>is rated to run on anything from 100-300 volts AC and not only will it work
>>on MSW power but it works on straight 160V DC power too. (from the DC rail
>>before the output FETs on an MSW inverter.
>Active PFC has everything to do with a device not working on an MSW
>inverter. In fact, that's one of only a couple of reasons why a
>device will not work on MSW. The other reason is that the device
>relies too much on the peak value of the AC sinusoid. Some microwave
>ovens are offenders here.
>Just off the top of my head I can name at least 10 active PFC
>architectures and there are invariably those that I don't know about.
>I can show you one that for sure will NOT work on anything but a low
>distortion sine wave. The reason that I know is that I designed it.
>http://www.neon-john.net/Induction/PFC.htm
>No, I didn't intentionally design it not to work with non-sinusoids.
>The controller chip that I selected determined that. I've since
>switched techniques since my product needs to be able to run on
>inverters and cheap generators.
>-----------
>To the original poster. Does your power supply use a 3 wire cord? If
>it does then try connecting the power supply to the inverter without
>the ground wire. Use a 2 to 3 wire adapter, a 2 wire extension cord
>or something similar.
>I've run into Dell power bricks that won't run on an inverter and the
>problem was with the inverter neutral and not the active PFC.
>Specifically, the problem is in the inverter and its lack of an earth
>ground.
>Most inexpensive inverters have the neutral sitting about 60 volts
>negative with respect to earth ground. That makes for a much simpler
>and cheaper output stage. The problem is that the Dell power brick
>doesn't like seeing any potential between ground and neutral. In the
>instances where this problem has arisen (either with my computer or
>those of people whom I've helped over the net), removing the
>connection to the ground pin has solved the problem.
>I don't advocate cutting the ground pin on general principle. The
>easiest solution is to use a 2 to 3 wire adapter plug. You can also go
>into the inverter and remove the ground wire, as it has no meaning in
>this context.
>John
Thanks for that idea. But a true sine wave UPS is being delivered today,
so I'm not going to experiment with grounding issues. But it'll be
interesting to measure the neutral-ground voltage on the UPS I've been
using. Although it is non-sine wave, it is not what I would term "cheap",
so I would expect it to be properly grounded, unless there is something
wrong with the house wiring. And the UPS does have a sensor that is
supposed to detect this kind of fault.
--ron
Posted by Brad Guth on March 7, 2010, 2:55 am
> Does anyone know if this computer will run on an SW5548?
> My wife just purchased one for our "on-grid" home and we discovered that an
> APC UPS (BackUPS RS-1500), that works fine with older models, will not work
> with this one.
> Apparently the XPS9000 PSU apparently requires a better quality "sine
> wave". The UPS can be upgraded. APC's SmartUPS series is supposed to
> work.
> But now I am wondering if anyone knows if the power at our "off-grid" home,
> from our SW5548's, would be "good enough".
> Thanks.
> --ron
Add a little RC. Nothing less than 10 ohms and a 5 mf capacitor in
series should do the trick, applied across that power line and you're
good to go.
You might try as much as a 25 ohm and 10 mf, or even as little as 10
ohms and 1 mf. Rounding off those SW5548 spikes should be sufficient.
Otherwise exclude the UPS all together because your PC will never know
the difference. Don't even bother asking APC, because they don't seem
to know squat.
~ BG
>> the software. That's true on my APC UPS's also, but the software is
>> included with the units; and I'm pretty certain is freely downloadable from
>> the APC web site.
> The software itself isn't the issue, it's a weird problem in the
>SmartUPS 2000 that prevents the APC software from doing anything more
>than allow the installer to detect I've got it connected. Once
>installed, it cannot make sense of the responses it gets back from that
>UPS.
> The same software has no problems whatsoever with the smaller SmartUPS
>700 which can be set to low senstivity without using the software anyway
>(it has a button on the back which allows you to toggle between hi, mid
>and lo sensitivity. The SmartUPS 2000 can only be switched between hi
>and mid sensitivity on the rear panel dipswitch with the low sensitivity
>option only being available via the 'funny' serial port and the
>management software.
> I can access most of the monitoring functions using an open source APC
>monitoring program but the problem seems to be that any attempts to make
>any changes of settings fail to be stored. It's as if the nvram area has
>been write protected. I suspect it may have been misprogrammed in the
>past (I'd bought it secondhand at a radioham rally some years ago sans
>its battery box, hence the external battery pack of four 25AH SLAs and
>eight, in two banks, used 7AH SLAs of indifferent capacity being 'parked
>to maintain condition' to provide additional, if uncertain, capacity).
> Other than this strange software issue, the UPS works exactly as
>intended. The only reason I even bothered wiring up a 'funny' rs232
>adapter cable to run the software was because I needed to desensitise it
>even further than the dipswitch option allowed. If I could get my hands
>on a controller chip from a scrapped Smartups 1200, 1700 or 2000, I
>think I can restore it back to full functionality again.
>> Good luck with your tinkering.
>> --ron
> Thanks, I think I'm going to need every bit of luck I can grab onto to
>sort this one out. ;-)
>--
>Regards, John.