Please Register and login to reply and use other advanced options
Posted by Energy-Ingenuity on April 18, 2012, 1:44 am
> wrote:
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Understanding Scams like this one.
> > > > > There are two simple Energy Laws that govern the generation of energy,
> > > > > they are both laws of physics as we currently understand physics that
> > > > > can't broken without re-writing laws of physics that have withstood
> > > > > every challenge (like this scam) to their validity for decades.
> > > > > If an energy plan is not conforming to these laws there is something
> > > > > wrong either with the laws of physics (not likely) or the way that
> > > > > energy plan is being presented.
> > > > > Energy Laws: (Law of conservation of energy)
> > > > > 1) Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form
> > > > > to another.
> > > > > 2) The conversion of energy from one form to another always consumes
> > > > > some of the energy from the source and the converted energy is always
> > > > > less the source.
> > > > > For example:
> > > > > Combustion engines (either internal or external) convert heat derived
> > > > > from fuel, to expand gases, to creating motion, and the energy of
> > > > > rotating engine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
> > > > > fuel.
> > > > > Wind or water provides the motion for turbines, and the energy of
> > > > > rotating turbine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
> > > > > wind or water driving it.
> > > > > Pretty simple and easy to understand and explain, so why doesn't
> > > > > Scam-Ingenuity give a simple and easy to understand and explanation?
> > > > > Magnets can't create energy (energy law 1), they can induce an
> > > > > electrical current, but ONLY when combined with motion, and it is the
> > > > > energy of the motion that is converted to electricity but always at
> > > > > energy output less than the input energy of the motion (energy law 2).
> > > > > You CAN'T end up with more output energy than input energy or you're
> > > > > creating energy, SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING which is IMPOSSIBLE without
> > > > > rewriting every physics book on the face of the planet.
> > > > > As far his claim the no one "can get a patent, claiming energy from
> > > > > Magnets, with out physical proof", here's his patent and it describes
> > > > > a simple alternator or generator and mentions nothing about
> > > > > Ward-Farce, an error with Lenz's Law or Newton's third law or law of
> > > > > conservation of energy, OR FREE ENERGY.http://www.google.com/patents?id=zJTGAAAAEBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq= ...
> > > > > Lenz's Law must always obey Newton's third law and The Law of
> > > > > Conservation of Energy.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz%27s_law
> > > > > Newton's third lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion#Newton.27s_thi ...
> > > > > Law of conservation of energyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
> > > > > So, given these FACTS with absolute PROOF to back them, the only proof
> > > > > Scam-Ingenuity can offer is the answers to 5 simple questions:
> > > > > 1) Every physics book on the face of the planet say you can't create
> > > > > or destroy energy, just convert it from one from to another, and
> > > > > always at less than 100%. So, if it can't create energy, and it can't
> > > > > convert it a greater than 100%, WHERE DOES THE ENERGY COME FROM???
> > > > > 2) Why, no references are made to this magical Ward Farce using any
> > > > > name or using any description or an error with Lenz's Law or Newton's
> > > > > third law or law of conservation of energy, OR FREE ENERGY in the
> > > > > patent???
> > > > > 3) Why aren't the energy companies "beating a path to his door" in the
> > > > > middle of an energy crisis, for this "better mouse-trap"???
> > > > > 4) Why aren't professors and teachers you "claim" to have demonstrated
> > > > > the invention to, screaming from the highest mountain that you solved
> > > > > the energy crisis???
> > > > > 5) Why do the laws of physics apply to every thing and every one on
> > > > > the planet, but your invention and you???
> > > > > So I will teach others what I have learned, for the good of our
> > > > > children and the future of mankind. This is a flat-out SCAM, by an all
> > > > > too well known scammer, who has absolutely NO proof (unlike the links
> > > > > in this post PROVING his scam), whose only goal is STEAL, ROB, AND
> > > > > CHEAT people out of their money.
> > > > > This is a serious ass hole.
> > > > > Curbie
> > > > Curbie,
> > > > The simple answer to these 5 questions is, THEY DID NOT DO, WHAT WE
> > > > ARE DOING. We are causing induction a different way than Lenz and
> > > > eveyone else has. After the current is taken, we are controlling a
> > > > force that everyone knows exists and showing how it is isolated from
> > > > the Poles. I am sorry you were not smart enough to find this by
> > > > yourself. Come see, test, build or something! Don't keep saying I
> > > > cannot do what I am doing, because this makes you look stupid!
> > > > Steve
> > > > Steve
> > > So just when are you going to build such a simple device and present
> > > it to real engineers for testing? No, not YOU demonstrate it, but
> > > THEY actually get to hands-on test it.
> > > You could have resolved this years ago but nooo...you just keep
> > > hawking your impossible plans.
> > > Harry K
> > Harry,
> > Please come here and test. The devices are built! When will you be
> > here? You will see my claims.www.energy-ingenuity.com
> > Steve
> I don't cross the sstreet to see what is impossible. Give your fake
> devices to saome eal engineers to be tested OFF-SITE and without you
> babbling in their ears. Let them publish the result.
> Harry K
What do you think I am trying to do? BUILD SOMETHING and test! Don't
tell me it is impossible when I am doing it and telling you how I am
doing it.
www.energy-ingenuity.com And if you have questions about how to build
something. 936-628-6192 or energyingenuity@gmail.com
Steve
Posted by harry k on April 18, 2012, 3:43 pm
wrote:
> > wrote:
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Understanding Scams like this one.
> > > > > > There are two simple Energy Laws that govern the generation of energy,
> > > > > > they are both laws of physics as we currently understand physics that
> > > > > > can't broken without re-writing laws of physics that have withstood
> > > > > > every challenge (like this scam) to their validity for decades.
> > > > > > If an energy plan is not conforming to these laws there is something
> > > > > > wrong either with the laws of physics (not likely) or the way that
> > > > > > energy plan is being presented.
> > > > > > Energy Laws: (Law of conservation of energy)
> > > > > > 1) Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form
> > > > > > to another.
> > > > > > 2) The conversion of energy from one form to another always consumes
> > > > > > some of the energy from the source and the converted energy is always
> > > > > > less the source.
> > > > > > For example:
> > > > > > Combustion engines (either internal or external) convert heat derived
> > > > > > from fuel, to expand gases, to creating motion, and the energy of
> > > > > > rotating engine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
> > > > > > fuel.
> > > > > > Wind or water provides the motion for turbines, and the energy of
> > > > > > rotating turbine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
> > > > > > wind or water driving it.
> > > > > > Pretty simple and easy to understand and explain, so why doesn't
> > > > > > Scam-Ingenuity give a simple and easy to understand and explanation?
> > > > > > Magnets can't create energy (energy law 1), they can induce an
> > > > > > electrical current, but ONLY when combined with motion, and it is the
> > > > > > energy of the motion that is converted to electricity but always at
> > > > > > energy output less than the input energy of the motion (energy law 2).
> > > > > > You CAN'T end up with more output energy than input energy or you're
> > > > > > creating energy, SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING which is IMPOSSIBLE without
> > > > > > rewriting every physics book on the face of the planet.
> > > > > > As far his claim the no one "can get a patent, claiming energy from
> > > > > > Magnets, with out physical proof", here's his patent and it describes
> > > > > > a simple alternator or generator and mentions nothing about
> > > > > > Ward-Farce, an error with Lenz's Law or Newton's third law or law of
> > > > > > conservation of energy, OR FREE ENERGY.http://www.google.com/patents?id=zJTGAAAAEBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq= ...
> > > > > > Lenz's Law must always obey Newton's third law and The Law of
> > > > > > Conservation of Energy.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz%27s_law
> > > > > > Newton's third lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion#Newton.27s_thi ...
> > > > > > Law of conservation of energyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
> > > > > > So, given these FACTS with absolute PROOF to back them, the only proof
> > > > > > Scam-Ingenuity can offer is the answers to 5 simple questions:
> > > > > > 1) Every physics book on the face of the planet say you can't create
> > > > > > or destroy energy, just convert it from one from to another, and
> > > > > > always at less than 100%. So, if it can't create energy, and it can't
> > > > > > convert it a greater than 100%, WHERE DOES THE ENERGY COME FROM???
> > > > > > 2) Why, no references are made to this magical Ward Farce using any
> > > > > > name or using any description or an error with Lenz's Law or Newton's
> > > > > > third law or law of conservation of energy, OR FREE ENERGY in the
> > > > > > patent???
> > > > > > 3) Why aren't the energy companies "beating a path to his door" in the
> > > > > > middle of an energy crisis, for this "better mouse-trap"???
> > > > > > 4) Why aren't professors and teachers you "claim" to have demonstrated
> > > > > > the invention to, screaming from the highest mountain that you solved
> > > > > > the energy crisis???
> > > > > > 5) Why do the laws of physics apply to every thing and every one on
> > > > > > the planet, but your invention and you???
> > > > > > So I will teach others what I have learned, for the good of our
> > > > > > children and the future of mankind. This is a flat-out SCAM, by an all
> > > > > > too well known scammer, who has absolutely NO proof (unlike the links
> > > > > > in this post PROVING his scam), whose only goal is STEAL, ROB, AND
> > > > > > CHEAT people out of their money.
> > > > > > This is a serious ass hole.
> > > > > > Curbie
> > > > > Curbie,
> > > > > The simple answer to these 5 questions is, THEY DID NOT DO, WHAT WE
> > > > > ARE DOING. We are causing induction a different way than Lenz and
> > > > > eveyone else has. After the current is taken, we are controlling a
> > > > > force that everyone knows exists and showing how it is isolated from
> > > > > the Poles. I am sorry you were not smart enough to find this by
> > > > > yourself. Come see, test, build or something! Don't keep saying I
> > > > > cannot do what I am doing, because this makes you look stupid!
> > > > > Steve
> > > > > Steve
> > > > So just when are you going to build such a simple device and present
> > > > it to real engineers for testing? No, not YOU demonstrate it, but
> > > > THEY actually get to hands-on test it.
> > > > You could have resolved this years ago but nooo...you just keep
> > > > hawking your impossible plans.
> > > > Harry K
> > > Harry,
> > > Please come here and test. The devices are built! When will you be
> > > here? You will see my claims.www.energy-ingenuity.com
> > > Steve
> > I don't cross the sstreet to see what is impossible. Give your fake
> > devices to saome eal engineers to be tested OFF-SITE and without you
> > babbling in their ears. Let them publish the result.
> > Harry K
> What do you think I am trying to do? BUILD SOMETHING and test! Don't
> tell me it is impossible when I am doing it and telling you how I am
> doing it.www.energy-ingenuity.comAnd if you have questions about how to build
> something. 936-628-6192 or energyingenu...@gmail.com
> Steve
So build one and shut up until you do. So far all you are doing is
running a scam.
Harry K
Posted by Jim Wilkins on April 18, 2012, 4:16 pm
-What do you think I am trying to do? BUILD SOMETHING and test!
Don't
-tell me it is impossible when I am doing it and telling you how I am
-doing it.
-www.energy-ingenuity.com And if you have questions about how to
build
-something. 936-628-6192 or energyingenuity@gmail.com
-Steve
If you are smart enough to discover something no one else has, why
can't you figure out how to make and sell them yourself instead of
pestering us?
The home wind power people make custom low-speed alternators out of
plywood and glue.
jsw
Posted by harry k on April 17, 2012, 1:34 pm wrote:
> > wrote:
> > > > Understanding Scams like this one.
> > > > There are two simple Energy Laws that govern the generation of energy,
> > > > they are both laws of physics as we currently understand physics that
> > > > can't broken without re-writing laws of physics that have withstood
> > > > every challenge (like this scam) to their validity for decades.
> > > > If an energy plan is not conforming to these laws there is something
> > > > wrong either with the laws of physics (not likely) or the way that
> > > > energy plan is being presented.
> > > > Energy Laws: (Law of conservation of energy)
> > > > 1) Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form
> > > > to another.
> > > > 2) The conversion of energy from one form to another always consumes
> > > > some of the energy from the source and the converted energy is always
> > > > less the source.
> > > > For example:
> > > > Combustion engines (either internal or external) convert heat derived
> > > > from fuel, to expand gases, to creating motion, and the energy of
> > > > rotating engine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
> > > > fuel.
> > > > Wind or water provides the motion for turbines, and the energy of
> > > > rotating turbine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
> > > > wind or water driving it.
> > > > Pretty simple and easy to understand and explain, so why doesn't
> > > > Scam-Ingenuity give a simple and easy to understand and explanation?
> > > > Magnets can't create energy (energy law 1), they can induce an
> > > > electrical current, but ONLY when combined with motion, and it is the
> > > > energy of the motion that is converted to electricity but always at
> > > > energy output less than the input energy of the motion (energy law 2).
> > > > You CAN'T end up with more output energy than input energy or you're
> > > > creating energy, SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING which is IMPOSSIBLE without
> > > > rewriting every physics book on the face of the planet.
> > > > As far his claim the no one "can get a patent, claiming energy from
> > > > Magnets, with out physical proof", here's his patent and it describes
> > > > a simple alternator or generator and mentions nothing about
> > > > Ward-Farce, an error with Lenz's Law or Newton's third law or law of
> > > > conservation of energy, OR FREE ENERGY.http://www.google.com/patents?id=zJTGAAAAEBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq= ...
> > > > Lenz's Law must always obey Newton's third law and The Law of
> > > > Conservation of Energy.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz%27s_law
> > > > Newton's third lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion#Newton.27s_thi ...
> > > > Law of conservation of energyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
> > > > So, given these FACTS with absolute PROOF to back them, the only proof
> > > > Scam-Ingenuity can offer is the answers to 5 simple questions:
> > > > 1) Every physics book on the face of the planet say you can't create
> > > > or destroy energy, just convert it from one from to another, and
> > > > always at less than 100%. So, if it can't create energy, and it can't
> > > > convert it a greater than 100%, WHERE DOES THE ENERGY COME FROM???
> > > > 2) Why, no references are made to this magical Ward Farce using any
> > > > name or using any description or an error with Lenz's Law or Newton's
> > > > third law or law of conservation of energy, OR FREE ENERGY in the
> > > > patent???
> > > > 3) Why aren't the energy companies "beating a path to his door" in the
> > > > middle of an energy crisis, for this "better mouse-trap"???
> > > > 4) Why aren't professors and teachers you "claim" to have demonstrated
> > > > the invention to, screaming from the highest mountain that you solved
> > > > the energy crisis???
> > > > 5) Why do the laws of physics apply to every thing and every one on
> > > > the planet, but your invention and you???
> > > > So I will teach others what I have learned, for the good of our
> > > > children and the future of mankind. This is a flat-out SCAM, by an all
> > > > too well known scammer, who has absolutely NO proof (unlike the links
> > > > in this post PROVING his scam), whose only goal is STEAL, ROB, AND
> > > > CHEAT people out of their money.
> > > > This is a serious ass hole.
> > > > Curbie
> > > Curbie,
> > > The simple answer to these 5 questions is, THEY DID NOT DO, WHAT WE
> > > ARE DOING. We are causing induction a different way than Lenz and
> > > eveyone else has. After the current is taken, we are controlling a
> > > force that everyone knows exists and showing how it is isolated from
> > > the Poles. I am sorry you were not smart enough to find this by
> > > yourself. Come see, test, build or something! Don't keep saying I
> > > cannot do what I am doing, because this makes you look stupid!
> > > Steve
> > > Steve
> > So just when are you going to build such a simple device and present
> > it to real engineers for testing? No, not YOU demonstrate it, but
> > THEY actually get to hands-on test it.
> > You could have resolved this years ago but nooo...you just keep
> > hawking your impossible plans.
> > Harry K
> Harry,
> Please come here and test. The devices are built! When will you be
> here? You will see my claims.www.energy-ingenuity.com
> Steve
Oh, I forgot. The test must include your device actually running
something and not being connected to any other power source.
Harry K
Posted by boB on April 17, 2012, 6:27 pm On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 06:34:47 -0700 (PDT), harry k
>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> > > > Understanding Scams like this one.
>>
>> > > > There are two simple Energy Laws that govern the generation of energy,
>> > > > they are both laws of physics as we currently understand physics that
>> > > > can't broken without re-writing laws of physics that have withstood
>> > > > every challenge (like this scam) to their validity for decades.
>>
>> > > > If an energy plan is not conforming to these laws there is something
>> > > > wrong either with the laws of physics (not likely) or the way that
>> > > > energy plan is being presented.
>>
>> > > > Energy Laws: (Law of conservation of energy)
>> > > > 1) Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form
>> > > > to another.
>> > > > 2) The conversion of energy from one form to another always consumes
>> > > > some of the energy from the source and the converted energy is always
>> > > > less the source.
>>
>> > > > For example:
>> > > > Combustion engines (either internal or external) convert heat derived
>> > > > from fuel, to expand gases, to creating motion, and the energy of
>> > > > rotating engine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
>> > > > fuel.
>>
>> > > > Wind or water provides the motion for turbines, and the energy of
>> > > > rotating turbine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
>> > > > wind or water driving it.
>>
>> > > > Pretty simple and easy to understand and explain, so why doesn't
>> > > > Scam-Ingenuity give a simple and easy to understand and explanation?
>>
>> > > > Magnets can't create energy (energy law 1), they can induce an
>> > > > electrical current, but ONLY when combined with motion, and it is the
>> > > > energy of the motion that is converted to electricity but always at
>> > > > energy output less than the input energy of the motion (energy law 2).
>>
>> > > > You CAN'T end up with more output energy than input energy or you're
>> > > > creating energy, SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING which is IMPOSSIBLE without
>> > > > rewriting every physics book on the face of the planet.
>>
>> > > > As far his claim the no one "can get a patent, claiming energy from
>> > > > Magnets, with out physical proof", here's his patent and it describes
>> > > > a simple alternator or generator and mentions nothing about
>> > > > Ward-Farce, an error with Lenz's Law or Newton's third law or law of
>> > > > conservation of energy, OR FREE
ENERGY.http://www.google.com/patents?id=zJTGAAAAEBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq= ...
>>
>> > > > Lenz's Law must always obey Newton's third law and The Law of
>> > > > Conservation of Energy.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz%27s_law
>>
>> > > > Newton's third
lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion#Newton.27s_thi ...
>>
>> > > > Law of conservation of
energyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
>>
>> > > > So, given these FACTS with absolute PROOF to back them, the only proof
>> > > > Scam-Ingenuity can offer is the answers to 5 simple questions:
>>
>> > > > 1) Every physics book on the face of the planet say you can't create
>> > > > or destroy energy, just convert it from one from to another, and
>> > > > always at less than 100%. So, if it can't create energy, and it can't
>> > > > convert it a greater than 100%, WHERE DOES THE ENERGY COME FROM???
>> > > > 2) Why, no references are made to this magical Ward Farce using any
>> > > > name or using any description or an error with Lenz's Law or Newton's
>> > > > third law or law of conservation of energy, OR FREE ENERGY in the
>> > > > patent???
>> > > > 3) Why aren't the energy companies "beating a path to his door" in the
>> > > > middle of an energy crisis, for this "better mouse-trap"???
>> > > > 4) Why aren't professors and teachers you "claim" to have demonstrated
>> > > > the invention to, screaming from the highest mountain that you solved
>> > > > the energy crisis???
>> > > > 5) Why do the laws of physics apply to every thing and every one on
>> > > > the planet, but your invention and you???
>>
>> > > > So I will teach others what I have learned, for the good of our
>> > > > children and the future of mankind. This is a flat-out SCAM, by an all
>> > > > too well known scammer, who has absolutely NO proof (unlike the links
>> > > > in this post PROVING his scam), whose only goal is STEAL, ROB, AND
>> > > > CHEAT people out of their money.
>>
>> > > > This is a serious ass hole.
>>
>> > > > Curbie
>>
>> > > Curbie,
>>
>> > > The simple answer to these 5 questions is, THEY DID NOT DO, WHAT WE
>> > > ARE DOING. We are causing induction a different way than Lenz and
>> > > eveyone else has. After the current is taken, we are controlling a
>> > > force that everyone knows exists and showing how it is isolated from
>> > > the Poles. I am sorry you were not smart enough to find this by
>> > > yourself. Come see, test, build or something! Don't keep saying I
>> > > cannot do what I am doing, because this makes you look stupid!
>>
>> > > Steve
>>
>> > > Steve
>>
>> > So just when are you going to build such a simple device and present
>> > it to real engineers for testing? No, not YOU demonstrate it, but
>> > THEY actually get to hands-on test it.
>>
>> > You could have resolved this years ago but nooo...you just keep
>> > hawking your impossible plans.
>>
>> > Harry K
>>
>> Harry,
>>
>> Please come here and test. The devices are built! When will you be
>> here? You will see my claims.www.energy-ingenuity.com
>> Steve
>Oh, I forgot. The test must include your device actually running
>something and not being connected to any other power source.
>Harry K
I'll be waiting for the actual product to come out.
Wake me up when it's on the market.
Thanks,
boB
This Thread
Please Register and login to reply and use other advanced options
Latest Posts
|
XML site map
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Understanding Scams like this one.
> > > > > There are two simple Energy Laws that govern the generation of energy,
> > > > > they are both laws of physics as we currently understand physics that
> > > > > can't broken without re-writing laws of physics that have withstood
> > > > > every challenge (like this scam) to their validity for decades.
> > > > > If an energy plan is not conforming to these laws there is something
> > > > > wrong either with the laws of physics (not likely) or the way that
> > > > > energy plan is being presented.
> > > > > Energy Laws: (Law of conservation of energy)
> > > > > 1) Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form
> > > > > to another.
> > > > > 2) The conversion of energy from one form to another always consumes
> > > > > some of the energy from the source and the converted energy is always
> > > > > less the source.
> > > > > For example:
> > > > > Combustion engines (either internal or external) convert heat derived
> > > > > from fuel, to expand gases, to creating motion, and the energy of
> > > > > rotating engine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
> > > > > fuel.
> > > > > Wind or water provides the motion for turbines, and the energy of
> > > > > rotating turbine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
> > > > > wind or water driving it.
> > > > > Pretty simple and easy to understand and explain, so why doesn't
> > > > > Scam-Ingenuity give a simple and easy to understand and explanation?
> > > > > Magnets can't create energy (energy law 1), they can induce an
> > > > > electrical current, but ONLY when combined with motion, and it is the
> > > > > energy of the motion that is converted to electricity but always at
> > > > > energy output less than the input energy of the motion (energy law 2).
> > > > > You CAN'T end up with more output energy than input energy or you're
> > > > > creating energy, SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING which is IMPOSSIBLE without
> > > > > rewriting every physics book on the face of the planet.
> > > > > As far his claim the no one "can get a patent, claiming energy from
> > > > > Magnets, with out physical proof", here's his patent and it describes
> > > > > a simple alternator or generator and mentions nothing about
> > > > > Ward-Farce, an error with Lenz's Law or Newton's third law or law of
> > > > > conservation of energy, OR FREE ENERGY.http://www.google.com/patents?id=zJTGAAAAEBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq= ...
> > > > > Lenz's Law must always obey Newton's third law and The Law of
> > > > > Conservation of Energy.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz%27s_law
> > > > > Newton's third lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion#Newton.27s_thi ...
> > > > > Law of conservation of energyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
> > > > > So, given these FACTS with absolute PROOF to back them, the only proof
> > > > > Scam-Ingenuity can offer is the answers to 5 simple questions:
> > > > > 1) Every physics book on the face of the planet say you can't create
> > > > > or destroy energy, just convert it from one from to another, and
> > > > > always at less than 100%. So, if it can't create energy, and it can't
> > > > > convert it a greater than 100%, WHERE DOES THE ENERGY COME FROM???
> > > > > 2) Why, no references are made to this magical Ward Farce using any
> > > > > name or using any description or an error with Lenz's Law or Newton's
> > > > > third law or law of conservation of energy, OR FREE ENERGY in the
> > > > > patent???
> > > > > 3) Why aren't the energy companies "beating a path to his door" in the
> > > > > middle of an energy crisis, for this "better mouse-trap"???
> > > > > 4) Why aren't professors and teachers you "claim" to have demonstrated
> > > > > the invention to, screaming from the highest mountain that you solved
> > > > > the energy crisis???
> > > > > 5) Why do the laws of physics apply to every thing and every one on
> > > > > the planet, but your invention and you???
> > > > > So I will teach others what I have learned, for the good of our
> > > > > children and the future of mankind. This is a flat-out SCAM, by an all
> > > > > too well known scammer, who has absolutely NO proof (unlike the links
> > > > > in this post PROVING his scam), whose only goal is STEAL, ROB, AND
> > > > > CHEAT people out of their money.
> > > > > This is a serious ass hole.
> > > > > Curbie
> > > > Curbie,
> > > > The simple answer to these 5 questions is, THEY DID NOT DO, WHAT WE
> > > > ARE DOING. We are causing induction a different way than Lenz and
> > > > eveyone else has. After the current is taken, we are controlling a
> > > > force that everyone knows exists and showing how it is isolated from
> > > > the Poles. I am sorry you were not smart enough to find this by
> > > > yourself. Come see, test, build or something! Don't keep saying I
> > > > cannot do what I am doing, because this makes you look stupid!
> > > > Steve
> > > > Steve
> > > So just when are you going to build such a simple device and present
> > > it to real engineers for testing? No, not YOU demonstrate it, but
> > > THEY actually get to hands-on test it.
> > > You could have resolved this years ago but nooo...you just keep
> > > hawking your impossible plans.
> > > Harry K
> > Harry,
> > Please come here and test. The devices are built! When will you be
> > here? You will see my claims.www.energy-ingenuity.com
> > Steve
> I don't cross the sstreet to see what is impossible. Give your fake
> devices to saome eal engineers to be tested OFF-SITE and without you
> babbling in their ears. Let them publish the result.
> Harry K