Posted by Eeyore on April 7, 2009, 2:12 am
harry wrote:
> So you dump the heat in Summer. That invalidates the economics
> comlpetely.
What do you think power stations do 24/7/365 ?
Graham
Posted by harry on April 7, 2009, 6:45 pm
wrote:
> harry wrote:
> > So you dump the heat in Summer. That invalidates the economics
> > comlpetely.
> What do you think power stations do 24/7/365 ?
> Graham
They are using cheap coal and residual fuel oil, not expensive diesel
fuel. It's a cost thing. Also they are far more efficient than your
little genset at home. Though only hitting 35%.
Some of the commie cities had district heating schemes. Only used in
the Winter period of course.
http://web.worldbank.org/external/projects/main?pagePKd283627&piPKs230&theSitePK@941&menuPK"8424&Projectid=P089078
Posted by Alistair Gunn on April 7, 2009, 6:53 pm
harry twisted the electrons to say:
> Some of the commie cities had district heating schemes. Only used in
> the Winter period of course.
Also quite common in Austria, where they seem to be upgrading them from
straight district heating to CHP district heating. Again, they only use
them during the winter.
--
These opinions might not even be mine ...
Let alone connected with my employer ...
Posted by Tim Jackson on April 7, 2009, 9:00 pm
harry wrote:
> Some of the commie cities had district heating schemes. Only used in
> the Winter period of course.
Yes, they did. I spent a couple of months in St Petersburg & Moscow.
It blew my mind to see people couldn't be bothered to turn off the hot
tap, just left it running over the dishes or whatever.
People turned their heating right up, didn't care about efficiency,
because communal meant what you used didn't reflect much in what you paid.
Tim Jackson
Posted by Tim Jackson on April 5, 2009, 8:51 pm
harry wrote:
> wrote:
>> harry wrote:
>>> Re previous posting
>>> Found this:-http://www.globalte.com/index.php?pageId=2&sId
>>> It exists!
>> Yes. 60W - 6kW of load. It's designed for off-grid situations. Very
>> (un)helpful. Now get a real life. Do you really think scientists aren't
>> already aware of this and its cost ?
>>
>> If you want efficient power you need co-gen like
this.http://www.mandiesel.com/category_000082.html
>>
>> " In combined heat and power mode (CHP) they generate both electrical
>> power and thermal energy and so overall energy utilisation levels as
>> high as 95%. "
>>
>> Graham
>
> Aha! Well CHP is something I know about having run industrial sized
> plant.
> The main problem is only rarely do the heating and electric
> requirements meet what the CHP device is generating. Ie, what do you
> do in Summer with the heat when you want just electricity? You "need
> to have a need" for heat all year round. Unless you have very large
> requirements and are using the device only to meet part of the load,
> the economics just don't work out. It's helpful if you can export
> unwanted electricity. But this needs expensive synchronising
> equipment.
> You need to be able to run the thing flat out all times to make it
> pay.
> So, no use for home power, only useful in an industrial situation. We
> used ours for a hospital laundry which needed heat and electricity all
> the time.
> At least the thermopile has no moving parts & hence presumably would
> be more reliable (and silent)... Could it run off, say a wood fire?
> Of course it too is a CHP device.
> Cost? Hmm Steam engines and turbines are also costly and inefficient.
Thermopiles are by their nature incredibly inefficient. Handy when
you've got masses of temperature difference hanging around doing nothing
want a tiny amount of power, and don't have any other source handy. You
might use one to run a radio receiver off a camp fire, just maybe, if
you could be bothered lugging the great thing around
The problem is that thermal conduction and electrical conduction in
metals are related, so anything that makes a good electrical conductor
between the hot and cold points also makes a good thermal conductor, so
for every watt of electricity produced you get some hundreds of watts of
conducted heat, Use worse conductors and you get proportionately more
electrical losses.
There's a picture of a 100W thermopile on this site, it's about a cubic
metre in size, and mostly metal.
www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/POWER/thermoelectric/thermoelectric.htm
But if you replace the metals with semiconductors you can get much
bigger voltages, and sometimes big differences between electrical and
thermal conductivity. Regular electronic semiconductors are unsuited to
high temperatures, so practical thermoelectric generators tend to use
rather exotic materials.
You might want to start here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectricity
Tim Jackson
> comlpetely.