Posted by Energy-Ingenuity on September 29, 2011, 4:22 pm
> >How much proof do you need?
> > US patent, US patent pending
> Not proof.
> >drawings,
> Not proof
> >videos
> Certainly not proof. Videos are easily faked.
> >references
> That might help! Post your verifiable references right here: (Prediction: You
> won't)
> Better yet, show us where your theories have been peer reviewed in a scientific
> publication.
> While you are at it, give us links to folks who have replicated your device and
> are now reaping the benefits of free energy. Certainly after all these years
> there have been some.
> > If this was a scam, why am I not in jail?
> Not proof. The world is full of unjailed criminals.
> >Do you think that the parents would stand by while their children are
> >being shown something that is a scam?
> Not proof. How many of those parents are scientists? Of those, how many were
> given advance opportunity view your presentation then approve or disapprove?
> > I give a list of High Schools
> Not proof. Teachers and administrators are ...well...teachers and
> administrators. They are typically not scientists and thus are not necessarily
> qualified to judge your theories.
> .
> >many are not listed, not to mention Colleges and Universities that I have
> >demonstrated for.
> Not proof. See above.
> Vaughn
Hahaha, when you learn, from some one elses work, again, how will you
feel, knowing that my claims are true?
Steve Ward
www.energy-ingenuity.com
Posted by vaughn on September 29, 2011, 7:36 pm
.> >How much proof do you need?
>> > US patent, US patent pending
.>> Not proof.
>.> >drawings,
.>> Not proof
.> >>videos
.>> Certainly not proof. Videos are easily faked.
.> >>references
.>> That might help! Post your verifiable references right here: (Prediction:
You
.>> won't)
>>> Better yet, show us where your theories have been peer reviewed in a
>>> scientific
>>> publication.
>> While you are at it, give us links to folks who have replicated your device
>> and
>> are now reaping the benefits of free energy. Certainly after all these years
>> there have been some.
>> > If this was a scam, why am I not in jail?
>> Not proof. The world is full of unjailed criminals.
>> >Do you think that the parents would stand by while their children are
>> >being shown something that is a scam?
>> Not proof. How many of those parents are scientists? Of those, how many were
>> given advance opportunity view your presentation then approve or disapprove?
>> > I give a list of High Schools
>> Not proof. Teachers and administrators are ...well...teachers and
>> administrators. They are typically not scientists and thus are not
>> necessarily
>> qualified to judge your theories.
>> >many are not listed, not to mention Colleges and Universities that I have
>> >demonstrated for.
>> Not proof. See above.
>Hahaha, when you learn, from some one elses work, again, how will you
>feel, knowing that my claims are true?
So again you claim to offer proof, yet when pressed for basic, simple details
you give only insults and evasion. Why should anyone listen to you?
Vaughn
Posted by Mho on September 30, 2011, 1:46 am
Yeah, show some proof. You say you are all about "teaching others" so do
some, here.
-------------
So again you claim to offer proof, yet when pressed for basic, simple
details
you give only insults and evasion. Why should anyone listen to you?
Vaughn
Posted by Energy-Ingenuity on September 30, 2011, 10:59 am
> Yeah, show some proof. You say you are all about "teaching others" so do
> some, here.
> So again you claim to offer proof, yet when pressed for basic, simple
> details
> you give only insults and evasion. Why should anyone listen to you?
> Vaughn
What else can I give you? List of materials needed, drawings,
videos, ... all of this and more is FREE on my website. Show me the
test that the "Lenz Law" was deducted (in English) from and I will
show you how it was an incomplete test!
Steve
Posted by vaughn on September 30, 2011, 1:03 pm
>> Yeah, show some proof. You say you are all about "teaching others" so do
>> some, here.
>>> So again you claim to offer proof, yet when pressed for basic, simple
>>> details
>>> you give only insults and evasion. Why should anyone listen to you?
>What else can I give you?
Check back in the thread. There are many questions we have asked that should be
easily answerable by you. Of course, you won't answer them.
>Show me the test that the "Lenz Law" was deducted (in English) from and I will
>show you how it was an incomplete test!
It's you who claims that Lenz's law is wrong, so the burden of proof rests with
you. Show where your work has been authoritatively peer-reviewed, and you may
earn our attention. Until then...
Vaughn
XML site map
> > US patent, US patent pending
> Not proof.
> >drawings,
> Not proof
> >videos
> Certainly not proof. Videos are easily faked.
> >references
> That might help! Post your verifiable references right here: (Prediction: You
> won't)
> Better yet, show us where your theories have been peer reviewed in a scientific
> publication.
> While you are at it, give us links to folks who have replicated your device and
> are now reaping the benefits of free energy. Certainly after all these years
> there have been some.
> > If this was a scam, why am I not in jail?
> Not proof. The world is full of unjailed criminals.
> >Do you think that the parents would stand by while their children are
> >being shown something that is a scam?
> Not proof. How many of those parents are scientists? Of those, how many were
> given advance opportunity view your presentation then approve or disapprove?
> > I give a list of High Schools
> Not proof. Teachers and administrators are ...well...teachers and
> administrators. They are typically not scientists and thus are not necessarily
> qualified to judge your theories.
> .
> >many are not listed, not to mention Colleges and Universities that I have
> >demonstrated for.
> Not proof. See above.
> Vaughn