Posted by krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz on April 28, 2010, 10:41 pm
wrote:
>> I just contributed $00.00 to help Tim Burns.
>> It would great to elect Tim Burns, who is the Republican candidate
>> for the May 18 PA-12 special election to fill the seat vacated by
>> the passing of Jack Murtha.
>>
>> http://www.timburnsforcongress.com/
>>
>> "We have a chance to win an upset election that will reverberate
>> through the country much like the election of Scott Brown did in January."
>>
>> Mike
>Ah yes, like the Scott Brown that screwed over the tea baggers.Useless
>idiots!
No, *you* are the idiot.
Posted by Ignoramus22435 on April 28, 2010, 11:05 pm
The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.
He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
NOT a politician".
This means two things:
1) That he is a liar.
2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".
I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.
i
Posted by krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz on April 29, 2010, 12:30 am
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435
>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.
Really?!
>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
>NOT a politician".
Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious!
>This means two things:
>1) That he is a liar.
You should know all about it, being a liar.
>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".
>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.
Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high).
Posted by Ignoramus22435 on April 29, 2010, 12:39 am
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435
>>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.
> Really?!
Yep.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/02/08/fight-shapes-up-for-murthas-seat/tab/article/
>>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
>>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
>>NOT a politician".
> Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious!
Just trying my best.
>>This means two things:
>>
>>1) That he is a liar.
> You should know all about it, being a liar.
I do not say something like "I am NOT a usenet poster", unlike that
Tim Burns politician who says he is NOT a politician.
>>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
>>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
>>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".
>>
>>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.
> Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high).
Possibly, but that does not make Tim Burns any more trustworthy.
i
Posted by krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz on April 29, 2010, 12:50 am
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:39:53 -0500, Ignoramus22435
>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:05:30 -0500, Ignoramus22435
>>
>>>The Republican candidate is Tim Burns.
>>
>> Really?!
>Yep.
>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/02/08/fight-shapes-up-for-murthas-seat/tab/article/
>>>He is a politician by definition (because he seeks a position of
>>>influence in government). And yet he claims on his website that he "is
>>>NOT a politician".
>>
>> Wow! You sure do have a grasp on the obvious!
>Just trying my best.
Obviously. Are you still breathing?
>>>This means two things:
>>>
>>>1) That he is a liar.
>>
>> You should know all about it, being a liar.
>I do not say something like "I am NOT a usenet poster", unlike that
>Tim Burns politician who says he is NOT a politician.
<shrug> *You* are still a liar.
>>>2) That he obviously thinks that there are enough gullible people who
>>>would vote for a politician, to appoint him to be a politician for
>>>their district, who says that he "is NOT a politician".
>>>
>>>I personally would not vote for such a dishonest liar.
>>
>> Your nym certainly *is* accurate (though perhaps 22434 too high).
>Possibly, but that does not make Tim Burns any more trustworthy.
I made no statement otherwise. That doesn't change the fact that you're a
liar, and an admitted ignoramus.
XML site map
>> It would great to elect Tim Burns, who is the Republican candidate
>> for the May 18 PA-12 special election to fill the seat vacated by
>> the passing of Jack Murtha.
>>
>> http://www.timburnsforcongress.com/
>>
>> "We have a chance to win an upset election that will reverberate
>> through the country much like the election of Scott Brown did in January."
>>
>> Mike
>Ah yes, like the Scott Brown that screwed over the tea baggers.Useless
>idiots!