Posted by Bruce Richmond on August 25, 2009, 5:09 am
> > > Don T wrote:
> > >>> > > > daestrom,
> > >>> > > > > > When we add heat to SVO, as in a duel tank environment, we
> > >>> do so > > > > > to
> > >>> > > > > > increase the fuels viscosity, correct???.
> > >>> > > > > You've got that reversed. Heating oil or most any other liquid
> > >>> > > > > *reduces* it's viscosity. A lower viscosity makes it easier to
> > >>> > > > > flow
> > >>> > > > > /pour (molasses has a high viscosity, water has a lower > > >
> > >>> > viscosity).
> > >>> > > > > Heating the oil makes it easier to flow, you just got your =
> >
> > >>> > > terminology
> > >>> > > > > reversed.
> > >>> > > > > > Is the heat shortening the hydrocarbons chains that
> > >>> recombine > > > > > when
> > >>> > > > > > cooled or is something else at play there???
> > >>> > > > > Not likely. Mild heating increases the kinetic energy of the >
> > >>> > > > molecules
> > >>> > > > > so they are 'vibrating' more. As they jostle around faster,
> > >>> they > > > > can
> > >>> > > > > slip past each other easier and thus pour/flow more easily. This
> > >>> > > > > applies to just about all liquids.
> > >>> > > > Dont know what I was thinking there, would not have wanted that
> > >>> > > > misstatement to stand, Thanks for the correction!
> > >>> > > > Do you know if the same mild heating and its increase in kinetic
> > >>> > > > energy (DECREASE in viscosity) also increases the fuels
> > >>> > > > volatility???
> > >>> > > > If mild pre-heat is just jostling the molecules around faster,
> > >>> > > > decreasing the fuels viscosity and the fuels hydrocarbon chain
> > >>> > > > lengths (volatility) remain the same, it would seem that
> > >>> viscosity > > > and
> > >>> > > > volatility are NOT tied together under ALL circumstances; this
> > >>> is > > > the
> > >>> > > > exact point that has me confused???
> > >>> > > The relationship still holds. While it is hot the oil is thinner and
> > >>> > > more volitile. As I said, some of they hydrocarbons that are liquid
> > >>> > > at room temperture will evaporate when heat is applied.
> > >>> > > > Bruce, Im tying to prove you wrong here, Im trying to figure
> > >>> > > > this
> > >>> > > > out, feel free to weight in on this point too.
> > >>> > > > Thanks,
> > >>> > > > Curbie- Hide quoted text -
> > >>> > > > - Show quoted text -
> > >>> > > When you wrote that you heated the oil to increase its viscosity I
> > >>> > > assumed you meant its viscosity after returning to room temperture.
> > >>> > > If what you meant was make it thinner while hot then daestrom is
> > >>> > > correct and it does not contradict anything that I wrote.
> > >>> > > Bruce
> > >>> > Oh boy,
> > >>> > Is "thinness" yet another oil attribute unrelated to viscosity???
> > >>> > Does it have a technical term so I can read up on it???
> > >>> Anorexic?
> > >>> Seriously there is no doubt what thinner means while increase/decrease
> > >>> of viscosity could be misunderstood. I hope you were joking above but
> > >>> with no smiley faces it's hard to know.
> > >>> > Thanks,
> > >>> > Curbie- Hide quoted text -
> > >>> > - Show quoted text -
> > >> Bruce,
> > >> I wasn't joking, Im sorry Im so slow on the uptake on this but I am
> > >> serious and after re-reading this thread twice, Im still confused!
> > >> If I understand this properly:
> > >> 1) Volatility and viscosity are tied together.
> > >> 2) They are affected inversely (as volatility increases, viscosity
> > >> decreases).
> > >> 3) Both volatility and viscosity are dependent on the length or
> > >> complexity of their hydro-carbon or carbon chains (SVO).
> > >> And this where I am in the mud, it seems to me (moron alert) that when
> > >> we pre-heat fuel we are either
> > >> A) Decreasing viscosity through kinetic energy while not effecting
> > >> volatility as defined as chain length or complexity (implying that
> > >> volatility and viscosity are tied with a caveat).
> > >> B) The pre-heat is shortening some of the chain length or complexity
> > >> which recombines when cooled.
> > >> C) Something is wrong or lacking with my three points of
> > >> understanding.
> > >> D) Something at play here not yet defined.
> > >> I apologize for being a moron but, I hope you can see why I cant seem
> > >> to get these pieces to quite fit yet, I dont know if the answer to my
> > >> problem is A, B, C or D???
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Curbie
> > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >> Volatility is the tendency of -anything- to turn to vapor. Each
> > >> different liquid/mixture of liquids has a different "boiling point" so if
> > >> you have a liquid that at 65 deg F doesn't tend to evaporate and is
> > >> fairly hard to pour but when heated to 95 deg F starts to evaporate and
> > >> is a lot easier to pour but does not yet boil then by increasing the
> > >> temperature of the liquid you have decreased the viscosity and increased
> > >> the volatility by raising the temperature closer to its boiling point. We
> > >> haven't necessarily changed any molecule chain's length though.
> > > Googled up the viscosity/temperature:
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_dependence_of_liquid_viscosity
> > > Interestingly enough is that there are oil additives that increase
> > > viscosity with temperature which gives the multi-grade oils. These
> > > additives are polymers which are all coiled up at low temperature but
> > > uncoil at high temperature to act as longer chains and increase viscosity.
> > > Think in terms of longer chains having more contact with each other which
> > > increases viscosity. Higher temperature lowers interaction decreasing
> > > viscosity.
> > > Viscosity is more dependent on the higher molecular weight species so
> > > there is not a direct tie with volatility.
> > Yes I know about those additives but the mission was to simplify enough
> > that Curbie could make a mental image for himself on rather a simpler scale
> > than mass industrial. Volatility is not 'defined as chain length or
> > complexity'. Pre-heat does not necessarily 'shorten or reduce complexity of
> > the chains' He almost got it but it seems there is another 'block' when he
> > says this;
> > "If I'm understanding your point correctly, preheat is NOT lowering the
> > boiling point, RATHER raising the temperature closer to its boiling
> > point......"
> > The boiling point of any material or mixture of materials is-what-it-is. No
> > matter the temperature of the substance. It is either boiling or
> > not-boiling. Water boils at 100 deg C or 212 deg F at sea level. The
> > boiling point of water can be increased or decreased by changing the air
> > pressure restraining the water or by the addition of certain soluble solids
> > but not by increasing or decreasing the -temperature- of the water. As a
> > mixture of liquids boils the temperature required to maintain the boil will
> > rise until it reaches the temperature of the highest boiling point liquid in
> > the mixture. It is this characteristic that allows us to 'distill' liquid
> > mixtures and separate out the different components/fractions.
> > --
> > Don Thompson
> > Stolen from Dan: "Just thinking, besides, I watched 2 dogs mating once,
> > and that makes me an expert. "
> > There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.
> > ~Goethe
> > It is a worthy thing to fight for one's freedom;
> > it is another sight finer to fight for another man's.
> > ~Mark Twain
> Well maybe my questions have been too broad, Don seems to have hit
> the nail on the head in terms of scope of these questions; whats
> possible or cost effective on a industrial scale for billions of
> gallons is interesting, but not necessary applicable for home-scale
> power, the basis of my questions.
> Ok, Ill try a different tact to see if this works.
> 1) Volatility is the temperature at which a liquid changes states to a
> gas (vapor) and is defined by its boiling point.
Part of the reason you have been going in circles is the definitions
you keep coming up with.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Volatility
1. evaporating rapidly; passing off readily in the form of vapor:
Acetone is a volatile solvent.
Evaporation and boiling are not the same thing.
Comments about heat keep coming up and got me to wondering just how
much heat we are talking about. At one point in our discussion you
mentioned using heat to change the viscosity and I assumed you meant
the viscosity of the final product after it had cooled down. To do
that it would mean bringing the oil to a boil and keeping it there for
a while so the lighter hydrocarbons boiled off. In another place you
mention pre-heating, but no mention was made of the temp or where this
figured into the process. So I went to the web site to see just what
we were talking about. What I found was more confusion about terms.
He wrote:
"So a hydrometer is a must.. Not using one you are risking your
engine.!!!!!!!
Please understand that the fuel thickness is important on how well the
engine injector can process it to make it into a clean burn. If its
too thick it will deposit huge amounts of carbon, and jello in the
crankcase.. Sticking rings,, valves, and sealing off the oil pump
suction screen.. "
Notice he is using the word "thickness" as opposed to "viscosity".
But he is checking it with a hydrometer, which checks specific
gravity, not viscosity or thickness. Water has a higher specific
gravity than SVO but it is not as thick. And he says nothing about
checking the volitility as a seperate test.
I notice he makes it very clear that you are to check the fuel density
at the temperture it will be used at. Again I think what he is doing
is making sure there are enough lighter hydrocarbons from the gasoline
to produce the heat needed to fully burn the heavy hydrocarbons in the
oil.
The centrifuge is used because it can filter down to smaller sizes
without clogging up. It may be taking some of the heavy waxes out but
is not otherwise altering the fuel other than cleaning it.
> 2) Viscosity is a fluid's thickness and is defined by its resistance
> to flow by its confinement surfaces.
> 3) Volatility & viscosity are not directly related.
Maybe not directly, or perfectly, but they are related in this case.
> This view brings me back full circle to the notion that for diesel
> fuel; volatility needs to be fixed to the point of clean fuel internal
> combustion, viscosity needs to be maintained at a point for proper
> external distribution and internally for proper injector fogging.
How are you proposing to check the volatility?
Bruce
> Don, do you have an opinion on this perspective???
> Thanks,
> Curbie- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Posted by Curbie on August 25, 2009, 10:18 am
> > > > Don T wrote:
> > > >>> > > > daestrom,
> > > >>> > > > > > When we add heat to SVO, as in a duel tank environment, we
> > > >>> do so > > > > > to
> > > >>> > > > > > increase the fuels viscosity, correct???.
> > > >>> > > > > You've got that reversed. Heating oil or most any other liquid
> > > >>> > > > > *reduces* it's viscosity. A lower viscosity makes it easier to
> > > >>> > > > > flow
> > > >>> > > > > /pour (molasses has a high viscosity, water has a lower > > >
> > > >>> > viscosity).
> > > >>> > > > > Heating the oil makes it easier to flow, you just got your > >
> > > >>> > > terminology
> > > >>> > > > > reversed.
> > > >>> > > > > > Is the heat shortening the hydrocarbons chains that
> > > >>> recombine > > > > > when
> > > >>> > > > > > cooled or is something else at play there???
> > > >>> > > > > Not likely. Mild heating increases the kinetic energy of the >
> > > >>> > > > molecules
> > > >>> > > > > so they are 'vibrating' more. As they jostle around faster,
> > > >>> they > > > > can
> > > >>> > > > > slip past each other easier and thus pour/flow more easily. This
> > > >>> > > > > applies to just about all liquids.
> > > >>> > > > Dont know what I was thinking there, would not have wanted that
> > > >>> > > > misstatement to stand, Thanks for the correction!
> > > >>> > > > Do you know if the same mild heating and its increase in kinetic
> > > >>> > > > energy (DECREASE in viscosity) also increases the fuels
> > > >>> > > > volatility???
> > > >>> > > > If mild pre-heat is just jostling the molecules around faster,
> > > >>> > > > decreasing the fuels viscosity and the fuels hydrocarbon chain
> > > >>> > > > lengths (volatility) remain the same, it would seem that
> > > >>> viscosity > > > and
> > > >>> > > > volatility are NOT tied together under ALL circumstances; this
> > > >>> is > > > the
> > > >>> > > > exact point that has me confused???
> > > >>> > > The relationship still holds. While it is hot the oil is thinner and
> > > >>> > > more volitile. As I said, some of they hydrocarbons that are liquid
> > > >>> > > at room temperture will evaporate when heat is applied.
> > > >>> > > > Bruce, Im tying to prove you wrong here, Im trying to figure
> > > >>> > > > this
> > > >>> > > > out, feel free to weight in on this point too.
> > > >>> > > > Thanks,
> > > >>> > > > Curbie- Hide quoted text -
> > > >>> > > > - Show quoted text -
> > > >>> > > When you wrote that you heated the oil to increase its viscosity I
> > > >>> > > assumed you meant its viscosity after returning to room temperture.
> > > >>> > > If what you meant was make it thinner while hot then daestrom is
> > > >>> > > correct and it does not contradict anything that I wrote.
> > > >>> > > Bruce
> > > >>> > Oh boy,
> > > >>> > Is "thinness" yet another oil attribute unrelated to viscosity???
> > > >>> > Does it have a technical term so I can read up on it???
> > > >>> Anorexic?
> > > >>> Seriously there is no doubt what thinner means while increase/decrease
> > > >>> of viscosity could be misunderstood. I hope you were joking above but
> > > >>> with no smiley faces it's hard to know.
> > > >>> > Thanks,
> > > >>> > Curbie- Hide quoted text -
> > > >>> > - Show quoted text -
> > > >> Bruce,
> > > >> I wasn't joking, Im sorry Im so slow on the uptake on this but I am
> > > >> serious and after re-reading this thread twice, Im still confused!
> > > >> If I understand this properly:
> > > >> 1) Volatility and viscosity are tied together.
> > > >> 2) They are affected inversely (as volatility increases, viscosity
> > > >> decreases).
> > > >> 3) Both volatility and viscosity are dependent on the length or
> > > >> complexity of their hydro-carbon or carbon chains (SVO).
> > > >> And this where I am in the mud, it seems to me (moron alert) that when
> > > >> we pre-heat fuel we are either
> > > >> A) Decreasing viscosity through kinetic energy while not effecting
> > > >> volatility as defined as chain length or complexity (implying that
> > > >> volatility and viscosity are tied with a caveat).
> > > >> B) The pre-heat is shortening some of the chain length or complexity
> > > >> which recombines when cooled.
> > > >> C) Something is wrong or lacking with my three points of
> > > >> understanding.
> > > >> D) Something at play here not yet defined.
> > > >> I apologize for being a moron but, I hope you can see why I cant seem
> > > >> to get these pieces to quite fit yet, I dont know if the answer to my
> > > >> problem is A, B, C or D???
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Curbie
> > > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >> Volatility is the tendency of -anything- to turn to vapor. Each
> > > >> different liquid/mixture of liquids has a different "boiling point" so if
> > > >> you have a liquid that at 65 deg F doesn't tend to evaporate and is
> > > >> fairly hard to pour but when heated to 95 deg F starts to evaporate and
> > > >> is a lot easier to pour but does not yet boil then by increasing the
> > > >> temperature of the liquid you have decreased the viscosity and increased
> > > >> the volatility by raising the temperature closer to its boiling point. We
> > > >> haven't necessarily changed any molecule chain's length though.
> > > > Googled up the viscosity/temperature:
> > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_dependence_of_liquid_viscosity
> > > > Interestingly enough is that there are oil additives that increase
> > > > viscosity with temperature which gives the multi-grade oils. These
> > > > additives are polymers which are all coiled up at low temperature but
> > > > uncoil at high temperature to act as longer chains and increase viscosity.
> > > > Think in terms of longer chains having more contact with each other which
> > > > increases viscosity. Higher temperature lowers interaction decreasing
> > > > viscosity.
> > > > Viscosity is more dependent on the higher molecular weight species so
> > > > there is not a direct tie with volatility.
> > > Yes I know about those additives but the mission was to simplify enough
> > > that Curbie could make a mental image for himself on rather a simpler scale
> > > than mass industrial. Volatility is not 'defined as chain length or
> > > complexity'. Pre-heat does not necessarily 'shorten or reduce complexity of
> > > the chains' He almost got it but it seems there is another 'block' when he
> > > says this;
> > > "If I'm understanding your point correctly, preheat is NOT lowering the
> > > boiling point, RATHER raising the temperature closer to its boiling
> > > point......"
> > > The boiling point of any material or mixture of materials is-what-it-is. No
> > > matter the temperature of the substance. It is either boiling or
> > > not-boiling. Water boils at 100 deg C or 212 deg F at sea level. The
> > > boiling point of water can be increased or decreased by changing the air
> > > pressure restraining the water or by the addition of certain soluble solids
> > > but not by increasing or decreasing the -temperature- of the water. As a
> > > mixture of liquids boils the temperature required to maintain the boil will
> > > rise until it reaches the temperature of the highest boiling point liquid in
> > > the mixture. It is this characteristic that allows us to 'distill' liquid
> > > mixtures and separate out the different components/fractions.
> > > --
> > > Don Thompson
> > > Stolen from Dan: "Just thinking, besides, I watched 2 dogs mating once,
> > > and that makes me an expert. "
> > > There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.
> > > ~Goethe
> > > It is a worthy thing to fight for one's freedom;
> > > it is another sight finer to fight for another man's.
> > > ~Mark Twain
> > Well maybe my questions have been too broad, Don seems to have hit
> > the nail on the head in terms of scope of these questions; whats
> > possible or cost effective on a industrial scale for billions of
> > gallons is interesting, but not necessary applicable for home-scale
> > power, the basis of my questions.
> > Ok, Ill try a different tact to see if this works.
> > 1) Volatility is the temperature at which a liquid changes states to a
> > gas (vapor) and is defined by its boiling point.
> Part of the reason you have been going in circles is the definitions
> you keep coming up with.
> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Volatility
> 1. evaporating rapidly; passing off readily in the form of vapor:
> Acetone is a volatile solvent.
> Evaporation and boiling are not the same thing.
> Comments about heat keep coming up and got me to wondering just how
> much heat we are talking about. At one point in our discussion you
> mentioned using heat to change the viscosity and I assumed you meant
> the viscosity of the final product after it had cooled down. To do
> that it would mean bringing the oil to a boil and keeping it there for
> a while so the lighter hydrocarbons boiled off. In another place you
> mention pre-heating, but no mention was made of the temp or where this
> figured into the process. So I went to the web site to see just what
> we were talking about. What I found was more confusion about terms.
> He wrote:
> "So a hydrometer is a must.. Not using one you are risking your
> engine.!!!!!!!
> Please understand that the fuel thickness is important on how well the
> engine injector can process it to make it into a clean burn. If its
> too thick it will deposit huge amounts of carbon, and jello in the
> crankcase.. Sticking ...
> read more
Bruce,
When talking to people, I been trying to use the same terms that they
use, if you want to use a different definition of something feel free,
but please include how its being measured; a bit like saying oh,
thats 18 degrees, 18 degrees F, C, K or what?
The dictionary.reference.com definition is an example of this
evaporating rapidly by what measurement? Google |"measure
evaporation" "fuel volatility"| and see if you can find anything
applicable, I did a bunch of phrase deviations with no luck, a term
without meaning is not descriptive.
I cant speak for anyone else, but I assumed boiling point was in
the context of vapor pressure.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapor_pressure
At the end of all this I will probably do some testing so by what
means these terms are being measured is important and the reason why I
keep defining them with measurements.
Volatility is a measure of the tendency of a substance to vaporize. As
measured by its vapor pressure.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volatility_ (chemistry)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapor_pressure
Viscosity is a measure of the resistance of a fluid which is being
deformed by either shear stress or extensional stress. In everyday
terms (and for fluids only), viscosity is "thickness." As measured by
its Kinematic viscosity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinematic_viscosity#Kinematic_viscosity
Now then there seems to be lots of discussion on the net about the
consequences of using SVO or WVO as fuel and compression-chamber
carbon-buildup and the different diesels out there (injector
pressures, and configurations) the causes seem to vary depending on
the diesel engine:
1) Viscosity, injectors not properly fogging the fuel properly.
2) Volatility, fuel not completely combusting.
3) Filtering, junk in the fuel.
So I was thinking that using a combination of solutions may cure the
compression-chamber carbon-buildup issue no matter my diesel
configuration:
1) Adding only enough gasoline to SVO to achieve proper volatility so
as not to risk the diesel.
2) Using the centrifuge to filter the mixture. (both oil crusher
ideas)
3) Lastly, use as duel tank environment to preheat the fuel for any
add viscosity required.
So the idea requires (I think) doing a baseline test on manufactures
recommended fuel for volatility and viscosity so they can be matched
with the SVO, gas, and preheat.
Curbie
Posted by Bruce Richmond on August 26, 2009, 2:31 am
[snip]
> > > Ok, Ill try a different tact to see if this works.
> > > 1) Volatility is the temperature at which a liquid changes states to a
> > > gas (vapor) and is defined by its boiling point.
> > Part of the reason you have been going in circles is the definitions
> > you keep coming up with.
> >http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Volatility
> > 1. evaporating rapidly; passing off readily in the form of vapor:
> > Acetone is a volatile solvent.
> > Evaporation and boiling are not the same thing.
> > Comments about heat keep coming up and got me to wondering just how
> > much heat we are talking about. At one point in our discussion you
> > mentioned using heat to change the viscosity and I assumed you meant
> > the viscosity of the final product after it had cooled down. To do
> > that it would mean bringing the oil to a boil and keeping it there for
> > a while so the lighter hydrocarbons boiled off. In another place you
> > mention pre-heating, but no mention was made of the temp or where this
> > figured into the process. So I went to the web site to see just what
> > we were talking about. What I found was more confusion about terms.
> > He wrote:
> > "So a hydrometer is a must.. Not using one you are risking your
> > engine.!!!!!!!
> > Please understand that the fuel thickness is important on how well the
> > engine injector can process it to make it into a clean burn. If its
> > too thick it will deposit huge amounts of carbon, and jello in the
> > crankcase.. Sticking ...
> > read more
> Bruce,
> When talking to people, I been trying to use the same terms that they
> use, if you want to use a different definition of something feel free,
> but please include how its being measured; a bit like saying oh,
> thats 18 degrees, 18 degrees F, C, K or what?
> The dictionary.reference.com definition is an example of this
> evaporating rapidly by what measurement? Google |"measure
> evaporation" "fuel volatility"| and see if you can find anything
> applicable, I did a bunch of phrase deviations with no luck, a term
> without meaning is not descriptive.
> I cant speak for anyone else, but I assumed boiling point was in
> the context of vapor pressure.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapor_pressure
Not trying to start an argument here but... the definition of
volatility that you provided did not agree with what was said at the
web site. On this page
http://www.oilcrusher.5u.com/whats_new.html
"My 3rd attempt was using sunflower oil cut 1 gallon gas to 10 gallons
sunflower oil. When the injector popped, there was a nice fog of
fuel,, and I could not find any micro strings of glycerin anywhere."
So the test was whether it would vaporize when sprayed out under
pressure and not leave micro strings. Nothing in there about boiling
point.
As for viscosity, he doesn't use the word. He wrote, "Please
understand that the fuel thickness is important on how well the engine
injector can process it to make it into a clean burn." And he wrote,
"I'm just using unleaded gas to thin the sunflower oil to match the
thickness of #2 diesel so the injectors can do a good job of fogging
it into the engine. I use a hydrometer calibrated from .820 to .
890." A hydrometer measures specific gravity as compared to water.
So despite using the word thickness, which implies viscosity, what he
actually was checking was the density.
BTW, he also wrote, "This opened up the fact that yes, thinning the
oil is the first step of burning raw oil." And you gave me shit about
using the word "thinner" ;)
As for standards and how things should be measured, here is a good
place to start your search.
http://www.globalsyntek.com/download/resources/ASTM_D975_TEST.pdf
> At the end of all this I will probably do some testing so by what
> means these terms are being measured is important and the reason why I
> keep defining them with measurements.
> Volatility is a measure of the tendency of a substance to vaporize. As
> measured by its vapor pressure.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volatility_ (chemistry)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapor_pressure
> Viscosity is a measure of the resistance of a fluid which is being
> deformed by either shear stress or extensional stress. In everyday
> terms (and for fluids only), viscosity is "thickness." As measured by
> its Kinematic viscosity.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinematic_viscosity#Kinematic_viscosity
> Now then there seems to be lots of discussion on the net about the
> consequences of using SVO or WVO as fuel and compression-chamber
> carbon-buildup and the different diesels out there (injector
> pressures, and configurations) the causes seem to vary depending on
> the diesel engine:
> 1) Viscosity, injectors not properly fogging the fuel properly.
> 2) Volatility, fuel not completely combusting.
> 3) Filtering, junk in the fuel.
> So I was thinking that using a combination of solutions may cure the
> compression-chamber carbon-buildup issue no matter my diesel
> configuration:
> 1) Adding only enough gasoline to SVO to achieve proper volatility so
> as not to risk the diesel.
> 2) Using the centrifuge to filter the mixture. (both oil crusher
> ideas)
> 3) Lastly, use as duel tank environment to preheat the fuel for any
> add viscosity required.
> So the idea requires (I think) doing a baseline test on manufactures
> recommended fuel for volatility and viscosity so they can be matched
> with the SVO, gas, and preheat.
> Curbie
I think you are putting your diesel at risk to some extent any time
you run it on fuel other than what it was built to run on. If I was
going to play around with this I would want to have a backup for
whatever engine I was using it in. Best choice would be a single
cylinder stationary engine that you could pull the head off frequently
to check for carbon buildup.
I don't think this is a total scam, but I do notice he is selling
kits, and I'd be skeptical about his claims of added power and
improved efficiency. Should be able to test that without buying a
press by buying a few gallons of sunflower oil and mixing it. Or
maybe buy some processed oil from him so there is no question
everything got done correctly.
Bruce
Posted by Curbie on August 26, 2009, 7:13 am
> [snip]
> > > > Ok, Ill try a different tact to see if this works.
> > > > 1) Volatility is the temperature at which a liquid changes states to a
> > > > gas (vapor) and is defined by its boiling point.
> > > Part of the reason you have been going in circles is the definitions
> > > you keep coming up with.
> > >http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Volatility
> > > 1. evaporating rapidly; passing off readily in the form of vapor:
> > > Acetone is a volatile solvent.
> > > Evaporation and boiling are not the same thing.
> > > Comments about heat keep coming up and got me to wondering just how
> > > much heat we are talking about. At one point in our discussion you
> > > mentioned using heat to change the viscosity and I assumed you meant
> > > the viscosity of the final product after it had cooled down. To do
> > > that it would mean bringing the oil to a boil and keeping it there for
> > > a while so the lighter hydrocarbons boiled off. In another place you
> > > mention pre-heating, but no mention was made of the temp or where this
> > > figured into the process. So I went to the web site to see just what
> > > we were talking about. What I found was more confusion about terms.
> > > He wrote:
> > > "So a hydrometer is a must.. Not using one you are risking your
> > > engine.!!!!!!!
> > > Please understand that the fuel thickness is important on how well the
> > > engine injector can process it to make it into a clean burn. If its
> > > too thick it will deposit huge amounts of carbon, and jello in the
> > > crankcase.. Sticking ...
> > > read more
> > Bruce,
> > When talking to people, I been trying to use the same terms that they
> > use, if you want to use a different definition of something feel free,
> > but please include how its being measured; a bit like saying oh,
> > thats 18 degrees, 18 degrees F, C, K or what?
> > The dictionary.reference.com definition is an example of this
> > evaporating rapidly by what measurement? Google |"measure
> > evaporation" "fuel volatility"| and see if you can find anything
> > applicable, I did a bunch of phrase deviations with no luck, a term
> > without meaning is not descriptive.
> > I cant speak for anyone else, but I assumed boiling point was in
> > the context of vapor pressure.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapor_pressure
> Not trying to start an argument here but... the definition of
> volatility that you provided did not agree with what was said at the
> web site. On this page
> http://www.oilcrusher.5u.com/whats_new.html
> "My 3rd attempt was using sunflower oil cut 1 gallon gas to 10 gallons
> sunflower oil. When the injector popped, there was a nice fog of
> fuel,, and I could not find any micro strings of glycerin anywhere."
> So the test was whether it would vaporize when sprayed out under
> pressure and not leave micro strings. Nothing in there about boiling
> point.
> As for viscosity, he doesn't use the word. He wrote, "Please
> understand that the fuel thickness is important on how well the engine
> injector can process it to make it into a clean burn." And he wrote,
> "I'm just using unleaded gas to thin the sunflower oil to match the
> thickness of #2 diesel so the injectors can do a good job of fogging
> it into the engine. I use a hydrometer calibrated from .820 to .
> 890." A hydrometer measures specific gravity as compared to water.
> So despite using the word thickness, which implies viscosity, what he
> actually was checking was the density.
> BTW, he also wrote, "This opened up the fact that yes, thinning the
> oil is the first step of burning raw oil." And you gave me shit about
> using the word "thinner" ;)
> As for standards and how things should be measured, here is a good
> place to start your search.
> http://www.globalsyntek.com/download/resources/ASTM_D975_TEST.pdf
> > At the end of all this I will probably do some testing so by what
> > means these terms are being measured is important and the reason why I
> > keep defining them with measurements.
> > Volatility is a measure of the tendency of a substance to vaporize. As
> > measured by its vapor pressure.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volatility_ (chemistry)http://en.wikipedi ...
> > Viscosity is a measure of the resistance of a fluid which is being
> > deformed by either shear stress or extensional stress. In everyday
> > terms (and for fluids only), viscosity is "thickness." As measured by
> > its Kinematic viscosity.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinematic_viscosity#Kinematic_viscosity
> > Now then there seems to be lots of discussion on the net about the
> > consequences of using SVO or WVO as fuel and compression-chamber
> > carbon-buildup and the different diesels out there (injector
> > pressures, and configurations) the causes seem to vary depending on
> > the diesel engine:
> > 1) Viscosity, injectors not properly fogging the fuel properly.
> > 2) Volatility, fuel not completely combusting.
> > 3) Filtering, junk in the fuel.
> > So I was thinking that using a combination of solutions may cure the
> > compression-chamber carbon-buildup issue no matter my diesel
> > configuration:
> > 1) Adding only enough gasoline to SVO to achieve proper volatility so
> > as not to risk the diesel.
> > 2) Using the centrifuge to filter the mixture. (both oil crusher
> > ideas)
> > 3) Lastly, use as duel tank environment to preheat the fuel for any
> > add viscosity required.
> > So the idea requires (I think) doing a baseline test on manufactures
> > recommended fuel for volatility and viscosity so they can be matched
> > with the SVO, gas, and preheat.
> > Curbie
> I think you are putting your diesel at risk to some extent any time
> you run it on fuel other than what it was built to run on. If I was
> going to play around with this I would want to have a backup for
> whatever engine I was using it in. Best choice would be a single
> cylinder stationary engine that you could pull the head off frequently
> to check for carbon buildup.
> I don't think this is a total scam, but I do notice he is selling
> kits, and I'd be skeptical about his claims of added power and
> improved efficiency. Should be able to test that without buying a
> press by buying a few gallons of sunflower oil and mixing it. Or
> maybe buy some processed oil from him so there is no question
> everything got done correctly.
> Bruce
Bruce,
I view most discussions (excepting trolls) as an opportunity to learn
something, a different perspective on things, I dont mind a few
circles as long as I learn something by the time I break out of orbit,
and I have learned a lot.
I saw that kits page and I dont why it did register, I to start
getting more sleep, but the details are just out there for free and
not tied to the purchase of his kits, so Im still not smelling scam,
but good catch anyway, profits have been known to shade the truth.
Thanks for ASTM doc link, and your right OilCrusher.com doesnt
mention a word about viscosity, or boiling point, or volatility, but
the ASTM doc mentioned and defined all three without a mention of
hydrometers or specific gravity. Both certainly look at fuel
attributes differently.
I know his is position is all well with a diesel if he gets good
fogging at the injectors, but straight gasoline would produce good
injector fogging but that wouldnt be good for the engine, there seems
to be a combination of attributes needed for proper combustion.
What all this has been leading up to is not only postponing buying an
oil press to begin with, but also the diesel. The question becomes
what can I learn from testing regular diesel fuel vs. oil crushers
home-made fuel that could be useful in the deciding whether or not go
with an oil crusher type fuel plan?
Using regular diesel fuel to set benchmarks to test the SVO-gas with,
anyway thats the idea Im pondering and this idea will cost next to
nothing relative to buying of press and diesel for testing. I have no
clue whether this type of testing would green or red light the SVO-gas
plan, but the cost of the testing is small enough to consider even if
the results didnt lead to a green or red light.
Thanks for all your time and help, for me, looking at things from
someone elses point of view is very valuable, I always learn more.
Curbie
Posted by Curbie on August 23, 2009, 6:05 pm
Bruce,
>In refineries they do what is called "cracking" to get more short chains out of
long
>ones.
Is this cracking process that refineries use purely a chemical
process???
I know this question seems dumb, but it stems from reading this
http://www.oilcrusher.5u.com/ site where the inventor uses a
centrifuge to mix/filter his SVO-gas and I'm wondering if this
centrifuge step could also be "cracking" hydrocarbon chains in the
SVO???
Thanks,
Curbie
> > >>> > > > daestrom,
> > >>> > > > > > When we add heat to SVO, as in a duel tank environment, we
> > >>> do so > > > > > to
> > >>> > > > > > increase the fuels viscosity, correct???.
> > >>> > > > > You've got that reversed. Heating oil or most any other liquid
> > >>> > > > > *reduces* it's viscosity. A lower viscosity makes it easier to
> > >>> > > > > flow
> > >>> > > > > /pour (molasses has a high viscosity, water has a lower > > >
> > >>> > viscosity).
> > >>> > > > > Heating the oil makes it easier to flow, you just got your =
> >
> > >>> > > terminology
> > >>> > > > > reversed.
> > >>> > > > > > Is the heat shortening the hydrocarbons chains that
> > >>> recombine > > > > > when
> > >>> > > > > > cooled or is something else at play there???
> > >>> > > > > Not likely. Mild heating increases the kinetic energy of the >
> > >>> > > > molecules
> > >>> > > > > so they are 'vibrating' more. As they jostle around faster,
> > >>> they > > > > can
> > >>> > > > > slip past each other easier and thus pour/flow more easily. This
> > >>> > > > > applies to just about all liquids.
> > >>> > > > Dont know what I was thinking there, would not have wanted that
> > >>> > > > misstatement to stand, Thanks for the correction!
> > >>> > > > Do you know if the same mild heating and its increase in kinetic
> > >>> > > > energy (DECREASE in viscosity) also increases the fuels
> > >>> > > > volatility???
> > >>> > > > If mild pre-heat is just jostling the molecules around faster,
> > >>> > > > decreasing the fuels viscosity and the fuels hydrocarbon chain
> > >>> > > > lengths (volatility) remain the same, it would seem that
> > >>> viscosity > > > and
> > >>> > > > volatility are NOT tied together under ALL circumstances; this
> > >>> is > > > the
> > >>> > > > exact point that has me confused???
> > >>> > > The relationship still holds. While it is hot the oil is thinner and
> > >>> > > more volitile. As I said, some of they hydrocarbons that are liquid
> > >>> > > at room temperture will evaporate when heat is applied.
> > >>> > > > Bruce, Im tying to prove you wrong here, Im trying to figure
> > >>> > > > this
> > >>> > > > out, feel free to weight in on this point too.
> > >>> > > > Thanks,
> > >>> > > > Curbie- Hide quoted text -
> > >>> > > > - Show quoted text -
> > >>> > > When you wrote that you heated the oil to increase its viscosity I
> > >>> > > assumed you meant its viscosity after returning to room temperture.
> > >>> > > If what you meant was make it thinner while hot then daestrom is
> > >>> > > correct and it does not contradict anything that I wrote.
> > >>> > > Bruce
> > >>> > Oh boy,
> > >>> > Is "thinness" yet another oil attribute unrelated to viscosity???
> > >>> > Does it have a technical term so I can read up on it???
> > >>> Anorexic?
> > >>> Seriously there is no doubt what thinner means while increase/decrease
> > >>> of viscosity could be misunderstood. I hope you were joking above but
> > >>> with no smiley faces it's hard to know.
> > >>> > Thanks,
> > >>> > Curbie- Hide quoted text -
> > >>> > - Show quoted text -
> > >> Bruce,
> > >> I wasn't joking, Im sorry Im so slow on the uptake on this but I am
> > >> serious and after re-reading this thread twice, Im still confused!
> > >> If I understand this properly:
> > >> 1) Volatility and viscosity are tied together.
> > >> 2) They are affected inversely (as volatility increases, viscosity
> > >> decreases).
> > >> 3) Both volatility and viscosity are dependent on the length or
> > >> complexity of their hydro-carbon or carbon chains (SVO).
> > >> And this where I am in the mud, it seems to me (moron alert) that when
> > >> we pre-heat fuel we are either
> > >> A) Decreasing viscosity through kinetic energy while not effecting
> > >> volatility as defined as chain length or complexity (implying that
> > >> volatility and viscosity are tied with a caveat).
> > >> B) The pre-heat is shortening some of the chain length or complexity
> > >> which recombines when cooled.
> > >> C) Something is wrong or lacking with my three points of
> > >> understanding.
> > >> D) Something at play here not yet defined.
> > >> I apologize for being a moron but, I hope you can see why I cant seem
> > >> to get these pieces to quite fit yet, I dont know if the answer to my
> > >> problem is A, B, C or D???
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Curbie
> > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >> Volatility is the tendency of -anything- to turn to vapor. Each
> > >> different liquid/mixture of liquids has a different "boiling point" so if
> > >> you have a liquid that at 65 deg F doesn't tend to evaporate and is
> > >> fairly hard to pour but when heated to 95 deg F starts to evaporate and
> > >> is a lot easier to pour but does not yet boil then by increasing the
> > >> temperature of the liquid you have decreased the viscosity and increased
> > >> the volatility by raising the temperature closer to its boiling point. We
> > >> haven't necessarily changed any molecule chain's length though.
> > > Googled up the viscosity/temperature:
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_dependence_of_liquid_viscosity
> > > Interestingly enough is that there are oil additives that increase
> > > viscosity with temperature which gives the multi-grade oils. These
> > > additives are polymers which are all coiled up at low temperature but
> > > uncoil at high temperature to act as longer chains and increase viscosity.
> > > Think in terms of longer chains having more contact with each other which
> > > increases viscosity. Higher temperature lowers interaction decreasing
> > > viscosity.
> > > Viscosity is more dependent on the higher molecular weight species so
> > > there is not a direct tie with volatility.
> > Yes I know about those additives but the mission was to simplify enough
> > that Curbie could make a mental image for himself on rather a simpler scale
> > than mass industrial. Volatility is not 'defined as chain length or
> > complexity'. Pre-heat does not necessarily 'shorten or reduce complexity of
> > the chains' He almost got it but it seems there is another 'block' when he
> > says this;
> > "If I'm understanding your point correctly, preheat is NOT lowering the
> > boiling point, RATHER raising the temperature closer to its boiling
> > point......"
> > The boiling point of any material or mixture of materials is-what-it-is. No
> > matter the temperature of the substance. It is either boiling or
> > not-boiling. Water boils at 100 deg C or 212 deg F at sea level. The
> > boiling point of water can be increased or decreased by changing the air
> > pressure restraining the water or by the addition of certain soluble solids
> > but not by increasing or decreasing the -temperature- of the water. As a
> > mixture of liquids boils the temperature required to maintain the boil will
> > rise until it reaches the temperature of the highest boiling point liquid in
> > the mixture. It is this characteristic that allows us to 'distill' liquid
> > mixtures and separate out the different components/fractions.
> > --
> > Don Thompson
> > Stolen from Dan: "Just thinking, besides, I watched 2 dogs mating once,
> > and that makes me an expert. "
> > There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.
> > ~Goethe
> > It is a worthy thing to fight for one's freedom;
> > it is another sight finer to fight for another man's.
> > ~Mark Twain
> Well maybe my questions have been too broad, Don seems to have hit
> the nail on the head in terms of scope of these questions; whats
> possible or cost effective on a industrial scale for billions of
> gallons is interesting, but not necessary applicable for home-scale
> power, the basis of my questions.
> Ok, Ill try a different tact to see if this works.
> 1) Volatility is the temperature at which a liquid changes states to a
> gas (vapor) and is defined by its boiling point.