Posted by Tim Thomson on January 8, 2006, 9:34 pm
Got into a argument at the pub the other day. LOL
According to the guy I was arguing with he says that if I am going to
use resistive heating that I should use 220vac instead of 110vac because
I will get twice the heat (BTU) for half the power reading on my metor?
I need something to print off to esplain to him how 220 works....221
whats the diff right.
Posted by SolarFlaire on January 8, 2006, 9:45 pm
If you have 1200 watts of heat (baseboard or whatever)
this will take 10 amperes of current at 120 volts.
This will also take 5 amperes at 240 volts.
Multiplying your volts times your amperes (current)
will yield watts or the heat you will get from your
heater.
i.e.: 5 amps X 240 volts = 1200 watts
10 amps X 120 volts = 1200 watts
So your friend is correct but a little confused. Yes,
the heater will take half the amperes at 240 volts but
the power (watts) will be the same in either case and
that is what your meter will see either method.
Now for the clincher. At 120 volts your heating will
take twice the current (amps) and that takes twice the
copper conductors (cross section) to get it there. Much
heavier wire needs to be run and that costs bucks.
Good luck
> Got into a argument at the pub the other day. LOL
> According to the guy I was arguing with he says that
if I am going to
> use resistive heating that I should use 220vac
instead of 110vac because
> I will get twice the heat (BTU) for half the power
reading on my metor?
> I need something to print off to esplain to him how
220 works....221
> whats the diff right.
Posted by Rick Frazier on January 8, 2006, 10:22 pm
In the simplest look, the amount of BTU you get from a given heater
should be the same, given the watts of electricity consumed. However,
that said, you should also bear in mind that some power meters don't
handle high current on one side of the 240 volt line very well. This is
primarily due to the electric company providing and metering at 240
volts. I've seen a few that will meter a 10 ampere load on 120 volts
(one side only) as if it were a 10 ampere load for the entire 240 volt
service, unless there is a corresponding load on the other side of the
line. Not all meters have this problem, but there are some out there
that still do. It's not exactly in the best interests of the power
company to replace these meters, as they are money makers in the event
you present an unbalanced load.
Thus, if you have a single heater on one side of the line, or two
heaters on the two sides of the line (neutral being the boundary between
the two 120 volt lines) and one heater runs more than the other, the net
cost could be higher than if you were using 240 volt heaters of the same
wattage.
Another problem you can run into is load imbalance affecting the actual
voltages you see on each side of the line. In extreme
circumstances, putting a large 120 volt load on one side of the 240
volt supply will "float" the neutral, moving it considerably away from
nominal 0 volts. This can cause a lower net voltage on the heavily
loaded side and a higher net voltage on the lightly loaded side. (This
effect is especially seen in cases where "daisy chain" wiring is the
norm, and there are one or more wirenut connections that are less than
perfect.) It's not unusual for older homes to see 100 volts on a heavy
loaded side, while there is 140 volts on the lightly loaded side. This
can play havoc with all sorts of devices on the higher voltage side of
the line. Unfortunately, some "marginally wired" newer homes have as
much problem with this as older homes, because some of the wiring is
done with 4 wires in a sheath, not two separate, three wire sheaths to
different circuits. With the 4 wire sheath, there are two "hot" wires,
one neutral, and one safety ground. The assumption is that the two hot
lines will have equal currents and the net current in the neutral will
be near zero, or at least the maximum offset will be within the current
carrying capability of the neutral wire. Unfortunately, this is not
always the case, even if correctly configured. Also, if this sort of
sheathed cable is incorrectly connected (both hot wires on the same side
of the line) it can present a significant hazard if both circuits are
heavily loaded. With two separate sheathed cables, each circuit has a
dedicated hot, neutral and safety ground, each of which is connected
directly to the distribution panel and not shared with any other
circuits.
During the initial construction, the loads are supposed to be
distributed equally on both sides of the line to present as balanced a
load as possible on the 240 volt service. This limits the potential
exposure to running heavy loads on one side of the line compared to the
other. Unfortunately, not all electricians care enough to actually
balance the expected loads, and many homeowners add things like portable
120 volt space heaters that radically affect this possible balance.
Most baseboard heaters are 240 volts, while portable plug-in units tend
to be 120 volts (at least in the US).
As already mentioned by a previous poster, running wire to 240 volt
heaters is less expensive (per watt) than 120 volt heaters. If you are
considering new wiring to handle electrical heaters, you should at least
consider 240 volt ones. If, on the other hand, you are using portable
units, you should be very careful to make sure the ones you purchase
have tip sensors (and shut off when the unit is disturbed or tipped
over), and at least try to balance the loads on opposite sides of the
240 volt line so you don't end up paying even more than you normally
would for electric heat. Also, you should be aware that most baseboard
heaters run at a lower temperature (at least on a per square inch
basis), and are inherently more safe (especially when unattended by a
careful adult) than most portables, which require minimum 36" spacing
from flammable objects...
For my money, I'd use 240 volt heaters and avoid the potential problems
with balancing the 120 volt ones.
--Rick
SolarFlaire wrote:
> If you have 1200 watts of heat (baseboard or whatever)
> this will take 10 amperes of current at 120 volts.
> This will also take 5 amperes at 240 volts.
> Multiplying your volts times your amperes (current)
> will yield watts or the heat you will get from your
> heater.
> i.e.: 5 amps X 240 volts = 1200 watts
> 10 amps X 120 volts = 1200 watts
> So your friend is correct but a little confused. Yes,
> the heater will take half the amperes at 240 volts but
> the power (watts) will be the same in either case and
> that is what your meter will see either method.
> Now for the clincher. At 120 volts your heating will
> take twice the current (amps) and that takes twice the
> copper conductors (cross section) to get it there. Much
> heavier wire needs to be run and that costs bucks.
> Good luck
> > Got into a argument at the pub the other day. LOL
> > According to the guy I was arguing with he says that
> if I am going to
> > use resistive heating that I should use 220vac
> instead of 110vac because
> > I will get twice the heat (BTU) for half the power
> reading on my metor?
> > I need something to print off to esplain to him how
> 220 works....221
> > whats the diff right.
> >
Posted by SolarFlaire on January 8, 2006, 10:48 pm
Not in Canada you won't see a meter do that. I have
seen all the approvals.
Can you state a meter type that can do this?
To aid in your confusion, the run-of-the-mill domestic
meter has only one potential coil (240V) and two "half"
current coils, one on each leg. Yes, it's to make it
cheaper.
Yes on a severely unbalanced ***VOLTAGE*** system there
can be unfair metering. One leg will meter with it's
current against half the total voltage. If you are
loading the low voltage leg then you are getting an
error against you.
This is only can only be slight (less than about 2%)
without wires and devices burning up, or bad
connections causing same usually.
A balanced electrical system is always good as your
neutral may not be sized to handle the load the line
legs are.
Now, on some multi unit complexes there is such a thing
as a "network" meter where three phase power is
supplied and only two legs and a neutral is supplied
each unit. This can save on copper. The voltages are
now at 120 degrees to each other and the voltages would
classically be 125, 125 and 216 vac. A phase to phase
load requiring 10 amps at 216 volts would consume 2160
watts (assuming resistive) the meter would see 10amps x
120 volts in each leg and although it would appear to
add up to 2400 watts there is a 30 degree phase angle
in each leg so the meter would see 120volts x 10amps x
cos(30deg) = 1080 watts in each leg for a total of 2160
watts!
Now VA demand customers get ripped as there are
differences between arithmetic summation of va and
phasor addition of va. One favours the utility and one
favours the customer. Domestic users never have to
worry about this problem.
Hope that confuses the shit out of ya....LOL
> In the simplest look, the amount of BTU you get from
a given heater
> should be the same, given the watts of electricity
consumed. However,
> that said, you should also bear in mind that some
power meters don't
> handle high current on one side of the 240 volt line
very well. This is
> primarily due to the electric company providing and
metering at 240
> volts. I've seen a few that will meter a 10 ampere
load on 120 volts
> (one side only) as if it were a 10 ampere load for
the entire 240 volt
> service, unless there is a corresponding load on the
other side of the
> line. Not all meters have this problem, but there
are some out there
> that still do. It's not exactly in the best
interests of the power
> company to replace these meters, as they are money
makers in the event
> you present an unbalanced load.
> Thus, if you have a single heater on one side of the
line, or two
> heaters on the two sides of the line (neutral being
the boundary between
> the two 120 volt lines) and one heater runs more than
the other, the net
> cost could be higher than if you were using 240 volt
heaters of the same
> wattage.
> Another problem you can run into is load imbalance
affecting the actual
> voltages you see on each side of the line. In
extreme
> circumstances, putting a large 120 volt load on one
side of the 240
> volt supply will "float" the neutral, moving it
considerably away from
> nominal 0 volts. This can cause a lower net voltage
on the heavily
> loaded side and a higher net voltage on the lightly
loaded side. (This
> effect is especially seen in cases where "daisy
chain" wiring is the
> norm, and there are one or more wirenut connections
that are less than
> perfect.) It's not unusual for older homes to see
100 volts on a heavy
> loaded side, while there is 140 volts on the lightly
loaded side. This
> can play havoc with all sorts of devices on the
higher voltage side of
> the line. Unfortunately, some "marginally wired"
newer homes have as
> much problem with this as older homes, because some
of the wiring is
> done with 4 wires in a sheath, not two separate,
three wire sheaths to
> different circuits. With the 4 wire sheath, there
are two "hot" wires,
> one neutral, and one safety ground. The assumption
is that the two hot
> lines will have equal currents and the net current in
the neutral will
> be near zero, or at least the maximum offset will be
within the current
> carrying capability of the neutral wire.
Unfortunately, this is not
> always the case, even if correctly configured. Also,
if this sort of
> sheathed cable is incorrectly connected (both hot
wires on the same side
> of the line) it can present a significant hazard if
both circuits are
> heavily loaded. With two separate sheathed cables,
each circuit has a
> dedicated hot, neutral and safety ground, each of
which is connected
> directly to the distribution panel and not shared
with any other
> circuits.
> During the initial construction, the loads are
supposed to be
> distributed equally on both sides of the line to
present as balanced a
> load as possible on the 240 volt service. This
limits the potential
> exposure to running heavy loads on one side of the
line compared to the
> other. Unfortunately, not all electricians care
enough to actually
> balance the expected loads, and many homeowners add
things like portable
> 120 volt space heaters that radically affect this
possible balance.
> Most baseboard heaters are 240 volts, while portable
plug-in units tend
> to be 120 volts (at least in the US).
> As already mentioned by a previous poster, running
wire to 240 volt
> heaters is less expensive (per watt) than 120 volt
heaters. If you are
> considering new wiring to handle electrical heaters,
you should at least
> consider 240 volt ones. If, on the other hand, you
are using portable
> units, you should be very careful to make sure the
ones you purchase
> have tip sensors (and shut off when the unit is
disturbed or tipped
> over), and at least try to balance the loads on
opposite sides of the
> 240 volt line so you don't end up paying even more
than you normally
> would for electric heat. Also, you should be aware
that most baseboard
> heaters run at a lower temperature (at least on a per
square inch
> basis), and are inherently more safe (especially when
unattended by a
> careful adult) than most portables, which require
minimum 36" spacing
> from flammable objects...
> For my money, I'd use 240 volt heaters and avoid the
potential problems
> with balancing the 120 volt ones.
> --Rick
> SolarFlaire wrote:
> > If you have 1200 watts of heat (baseboard or
whatever)
> > this will take 10 amperes of current at 120 volts.
> >
> > This will also take 5 amperes at 240 volts.
> >
> > Multiplying your volts times your amperes (current)
> > will yield watts or the heat you will get from your
> > heater.
> >
> > i.e.: 5 amps X 240 volts = 1200 watts
> > 10 amps X 120 volts = 1200 watts
> >
> > So your friend is correct but a little confused.
Yes,
> > the heater will take half the amperes at 240 volts
but
> > the power (watts) will be the same in either case
and
> > that is what your meter will see either method.
> >
> > Now for the clincher. At 120 volts your heating
will
> > take twice the current (amps) and that takes twice
the
> > copper conductors (cross section) to get it there.
Much
> > heavier wire needs to be run and that costs bucks.
> >
> > Good luck
> >
> > > Got into a argument at the pub the other day. LOL
> > > According to the guy I was arguing with he says
that
> > if I am going to
> > > use resistive heating that I should use 220vac
> > instead of 110vac because
> > > I will get twice the heat (BTU) for half the
power
> > reading on my metor?
> > > I need something to print off to esplain to him
how
> > 220 works....221
> > > whats the diff right.
> > >
Posted by Tim Thomson on January 9, 2006, 12:11 am
SolarFlaire wrote:
> Not in Canada you won't see a meter do that. I have
> seen all the approvals.
> Can you state a meter type that can do this?
> To aid in your confusion, the run-of-the-mill domestic
> meter has only one potential coil (240V) and two "half"
> current coils, one on each leg. Yes, it's to make it
> cheaper.
> Yes on a severely unbalanced ***VOLTAGE*** system there
> can be unfair metering. One leg will meter with it's
> current against half the total voltage. If you are
> loading the low voltage leg then you are getting an
> error against you.
> This is only can only be slight (less than about 2%)
> without wires and devices burning up, or bad
> connections causing same usually.
> A balanced electrical system is always good as your
> neutral may not be sized to handle the load the line
> legs are.
> Now, on some multi unit complexes there is such a thing
> as a "network" meter where three phase power is
> supplied and only two legs and a neutral is supplied
> each unit. This can save on copper. The voltages are
> now at 120 degrees to each other and the voltages would
> classically be 125, 125 and 216 vac. A phase to phase
> load requiring 10 amps at 216 volts would consume 2160
> watts (assuming resistive) the meter would see 10amps x
> 120 volts in each leg and although it would appear to
> add up to 2400 watts there is a 30 degree phase angle
> in each leg so the meter would see 120volts x 10amps x
> cos(30deg) = 1080 watts in each leg for a total of 2160
> watts!
> Now VA demand customers get ripped as there are
> differences between arithmetic summation of va and
> phasor addition of va. One favours the utility and one
> favours the customer. Domestic users never have to
> worry about this problem.
> Hope that confuses the shit out of ya....LOL YA LOL
> > > > I need something to print off to esplain to him
> how
> > > 220 works....221
> > > > whats the diff right.
> > > >
> >
> According to the guy I was arguing with he says that