Hybrid Car – More Fun with Less Gas

How to isolate Wardforce from the Poles - Page 2

register ::  Login Password  :: Lost Password?
Posted by vaughn on October 29, 2011, 1:40 pm
 


We're smart enough to ask simple questions that you can't afford to answer.

Curbie has ten simple and fair questions, but I only have one for you.  It's a
very simple question, so simple that you can answer it in one word "Yes" or
"No":

Do you claim that your device outputs more energy that you put in?

Vaughn



Posted by Mho on October 29, 2011, 4:33 pm
 
Excellent and simple!

This wannabee constantly ***implies*** his dynamic brake circuit outputs
more energy than he puts in. He never states anything other than...

       "If we can't teach our children something what is the pint of a
scam?"

Please teach your children the main objective....   his name.


------




We're smart enough to ask simple questions that you can't afford to answer.

Curbie has ten simple and fair questions, but I only have one for you.  It's
a
very simple question, so simple that you can answer it in one word "Yes" or
"No":

Do you claim that your device outputs more energy that you put in?

Vaughn



Posted by Curbie on October 29, 2011, 5:38 pm
 Now of course he won't give simple and easily understood answers to
ANY reasonable question, he can't, just more gibberish, non-sense,
evasion, and fairytales, all these reasonable "cause and effect"
questions and more have been repeatedly asked of him, and repeatedly
evaded by him in a desperate attempt to make this scam seem plausible.

Understanding Scams like this one.

There are two simple Energy Laws that govern the generation of energy,
they are both laws of physics as we currently understand physics that
can't broken without re-writing laws of physics that have withstood
every challenge (like this scam) to their validity for decades.

If an energy plan is not conforming to these laws there is something
wrong either with the laws of physics (not likely) or the way that
energy plan is being presented.

Energy Laws: (Law of conservation of energy)
1) Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form
to another.
2) The conversion of energy from one form to another always consumes
some of the energy from the source and the converted energy is always
less the source.

For example:
Combustion engines (either internal or external) convert heat derived
from fuel, to expand gases, to creating motion, and the energy of
rotating engine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
fuel.

Wind or water provides the motion for turbines, and the energy of
rotating turbine shaft is always less than the source energy of the
wind or water driving it.

Pretty simple and easy to understand and explain, so why doesn't
Scam-Ingenuity give a simple and easy to understand and explanation?
(It's a scam)

Magnets can't create energy (energy law 1), they can induce an
electrical current, but ONLY when combined with motion, and it is the
energy of the motion that is converted to electricity but always at
energy output less than the input energy of the motion (energy law 2).

You CAN'T end up with more output energy than input energy or you're
creating energy, SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING which is IMPOSSIBLE without
rewriting every physics book on the face of the planet.

As far his claim the no one "can get a patent, claiming energy from
Magnets, with out physical proof", here's his patent and it describes
a simple alternator or generator and mentions nothing about
Ward-Farce, an error with Lenz's Law or Newton's third law or law of
conservation of energy, OR FREE ENERGY.
http://www.google.com/patents?id=zJTGAAAAEBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=7,531,930&hl=en&ei=NHaOTtDcK-OqsQKT1K26AQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved  C8Q6AEwAA

Lenz's Law must always obey Newton's third law and The Law of
Conservation of Energy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz%27s_law

Newton's third law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion#Newton.27s_third_law

Law of conservation of energy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy

These are FACTS with absolute independent "verifiable" PROOF to back
them, that Scam-Ingenuity is a flat-out SCAM, by a known scammer.

Curbie


Posted by Mho on October 29, 2011, 10:43 pm
 ummmm.....
Your second law violates your first, as stated. Energy is never "consumed"

According to your first and common sense... conversion never "consumes" but
losses convert some of the source energy to another form of energy that may
not be desired ("losses").

--------------
"Curbie"  wrote in message
Energy Laws: (Law of conservation of energy)
1) Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form
to another.
2) The conversion of energy from one form to another always consumes
some of the energy from the source and the converted energy is always
less the source.

<Examples snipped>

Curbie


This Thread
Bookmark this thread:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
please rate this thread