Posted by Morris Dovey on December 18, 2010, 8:32 pm
On 12/18/2010 1:59 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
>> The length of time you consider "cost effective" is a personal
>> thing....the aprox number of years is relatively easy to
>> calculate...figure out your fuel/electric costs for a year...and then
>> figure out the costs for a solar installation at your
>> location...dividing will tell you aprox how many years the payback will
>> take...I have been told/heard that until solar goes under one dollar a
>> watt an installation is not cost effective except in some special
>> situations....
>
> So when will THAT be?
It's an already-solved problem. The web page at
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/solar.html
shows an early 2007 heating installation that paid for itself before the
end of 2009. If you click on the photo you get a page with installation
photos.
The "when" is pretty much up to you.
--
Morris Dovey
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Posted by Curbie on December 18, 2010, 8:39 pm
>This is for photovoltaic, hot air/liquid panels for heating or hot
>water are a different story....in most locations can be reasonably cost
>effective....
sno,
I couldn't agree more with this IMPORTANT notion, whether it's energy
for domestic heating, or energy for electricity, it all takes money
from the same pocket, and it seems to me finding the best energy
return-on-investment would be the best idea, regardless of whether
that energy is in the form of heat or electricity.
Curbie
Posted by m II on December 18, 2010, 7:54 pm
On 10-12-18 12:06 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
> With all the environmentalist lunacy, is solar even approaching the point of
> being cost effective for running my house in the short term? I'm not talking
> about amortizing the cost over 50 years, but right now?
> I see 5 watt solar panels selling for $00. Come on.
The bigger panels, around here, are now starting to approach 3 dollars a
watt. The biggest problem and cost is the storage. Batteries are heavy
and expensive. The payback time takes years, if ever, if you include
regular battery replacement. Even with a grid tie system, it takes
forever to break even.
I do it as a learning thing. That, and the fact I can gloat when the
grid shuts down. A freezer full of frozen food helps to offset battery
costs.
I've learned I can't use the microwave (130 amp battery draw). You have
to relearn how to cook and use gas or propane. A way of keeping the
luxuries is the use of a big healthy generator running a few hours a
day. You can get your cooking or laundry done and have a battery charger
boosting storage while it's running. I've quit using the electric dryer
and went back to a clothes line.
mike
Posted by Jane_Galt on December 18, 2010, 8:00 pm
> On 10-12-18 12:06 PM, Jane_Galt wrote:
>
>> With all the environmentalist lunacy, is solar even approaching the
>> point of being cost effective for running my house in the short term?
>> I'm not talking about amortizing the cost over 50 years, but right now?
>>
>> I see 5 watt solar panels selling for $00. Come on.
>
>
> The bigger panels, around here, are now starting to approach 3 dollars a
> watt. The biggest problem and cost is the storage. Batteries are heavy
> and expensive. The payback time takes years, if ever, if you include
> regular battery replacement. Even with a grid tie system, it takes
> forever to break even.
One big problem is that the power company doesnt have to pay you the same,
when you send the power back to the grid, as what you paid them for it.
That stinks.
> I do it as a learning thing. That, and the fact I can gloat when the
> grid shuts down. A freezer full of frozen food helps to offset battery
> costs.
>
> I've learned I can't use the microwave (130 amp battery draw). You have
> to relearn how to cook and use gas or propane. A way of keeping the
> luxuries is the use of a big healthy generator running a few hours a
> day. You can get your cooking or laundry done and have a battery charger
> boosting storage while it's running. I've quit using the electric dryer
> and went back to a clothes line.
>
> mike
>
>
>
>
--
- Jane Galt
"Remember that there is no such dichotomy as 'human rights' versus
'property rights.' No human rights can exist without property rights. Since
material goods are produced by the mind and effort of individual men, and
are needed to sustain their lives, if the producer does not own the result
of his effort, he does not own his life. To deny property rights means to
turn men into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the 'right' to
'redistribute' the wealth produced by others is claiming the 'right' to
treat human beings as chattel." -- Ayn Rand
Posted by Josepi on December 18, 2010, 10:35 pm
In Ontario they pay you 80.2 cents per kWh and makes a good investment on a
larger scale. A neighbour is installing a 120kW system right now.
Batteries are not allowed and the systems stay fairly simple.
They must be on the roof
There cannot be any other alternate sources included.
I believe most experienced and educated users will tell you the break even
point would be about 40 cents / kWh to even pay the interest on the money
investment loss and make it possible to ever get a payback. Some will tell
you the payback is 6-8 years at 10 cents/kWh but most can't multiply two
numbers together or tell you the difference between power and energy.
Solar thermal is a different beast, cheaper and payback times are much
quicker.
One big problem is that the power company doesnt have to pay you the same,
when you send the power back to the grid, as what you paid them for it.
- Jane Galt
>> thing....the aprox number of years is relatively easy to
>> calculate...figure out your fuel/electric costs for a year...and then
>> figure out the costs for a solar installation at your
>> location...dividing will tell you aprox how many years the payback will
>> take...I have been told/heard that until solar goes under one dollar a
>> watt an installation is not cost effective except in some special
>> situations....
>
> So when will THAT be?