Posted by Curbie on December 19, 2010, 12:20 am
advocating an over-unity system that defies
the laws of physics as there are currently known.
I missed your response on if you're advocating an over-unity system
that defies the laws of physics as they're are currently known???
Simple question, why is the answer so elusive???
Posted by Jim Rojas on December 19, 2010, 1:12 am
Let me get this straight...By your definition, a person running any
device that doesn't pollute, or line the pockets of some rich fat
corporation, considered an overunity device?
Posted by Curbie on December 19, 2010, 2:51 am
You can't get things straight by a half-assed attempt at twisting my
words, this isn't very complicated, that wasn't my definition, it's
the scientific definition; try wikipedia for overunity.
But get this straight... by my definition a SCAM is plan to dupe
people out of their time or money, and ALL overunity plans are flat
out scams that are physically impossible in terms of our current
understanding of the laws of physics.
A person has asked an honest question about a real alternative-energy
device and your response was "Don't waste you time" with real, do your
magic plan, only problem is, you won't give a straight answer as to
HOW your magic plan generates energy.
So how about skipping the gibberish, "double talk" and links to other
people's gibberish and, "double talk" and give us a straight clear
answer, where does your plan's energy come from, the grid, mars,
push-pull ward-farce, Richardson, thin air - what???
Now, let's take a look at your "rich fat corporation" non-sense, can
you explain why your "rich fat corporations" haven't built devices
from the these internet links and gotten richer and fatter, they all
have to be greedy enough???
Posted by Jim Rojas on December 19, 2010, 2:54 am
Just follow the threads more closely. You will find others have already
asked the same questions, but more politely.
Posted by Curbie on December 19, 2010, 3:40 am
I HAVE followed these threads closely, I have wasted my time on the
reading your gibberish, and "double talk" and have read the links to
other people's gibberish and "double talk" and wasted my time there
I have politely asked you give us a straight clear answer on where
does your plan's energy come from, but you've refused to provide a
simple clear answer.
I'm sorry if you soiled your delicate sensibilities, but you're the
one trashing real alternative-energy solutions and advocating
overunity non-sense, you need to grow a set if you insist on
continuing to dupe people with this un-explained pipe-dream, because
it only gets uglier from here.
Now, for the 4th time, where does your device get it's energy???