Posted by Michael B on June 18, 2011, 10:54 pm
wrote:
> > >> In article
> > > >> We know that a radio wave has force, we use the second wave to push
> > > >> the first wave, the third too push the second... I am saying this
> > >> > radio wave, as you know it has another part,
> > >> Totally BullShit...... Where did you find such crap? What Publication?
> > >> Your so full of it, your eyes are brown.....
> > >You and Vaughn,
> > No, let's get back to you twice lying about the US Patent office in your strange
> > attempt to bolster your bogus claims.
> > Do you stand by your own word or not?
> > Vaughn
> Vaughn,
> The point I was trying to make is; Some people think that they know
> everything! It was not the Patent Office that said this, only the
> director of it, in 1899 (1800's). I answered you questions, now what
> about the questions I have asked? What law of physics refers to, by
> changing the speed only, 3 different reactions are caused with respect
> to the input requirement? How am I violating these 1st and 2nd laws
> of Thermodynamics? I am showing and saying that these reactions are
> caused by something that has been isolated, not out of thin air!
> Energy-Ingenuity.com
> PS I put another drawing and video on my website, this week. We are
> working on another video that I will be posting by the end of June
> 2011.
Posted by Michael B on June 18, 2011, 10:56 pm
Yes, you are indeed saying it. But showing it? Nope.
wrote:
I am showing and saying that these reactions are
> caused by something that has been isolated, not out of thin air!
Posted by Michael B on June 19, 2011, 12:26 am
wrote:
> > In article
> > > We know that a radio wave has force, we use the second wave to push
> > > the first wave, the third too push the second... I am saying this
> > > radio wave, as you know it has another part,
> > Totally BullShit...... Where did you find such crap? What Publication?
> > Your so full of it, your eyes are brown.....
> You and Vaughn,
> What law of physics relates to these 3 speeds, causing 3 different
> reactions? Anyone can build one, even the ya'll, then test can be
> conducted and you will know my claims are true. You even have
> options, come here and test if you don't want to build one or have one
> built.
> I show on video that a Permanent Magnet is rotated, with out
> bearings, surrounded by a ferrous material and the Magnet does not
> lose it's Field. I am using a part of the Magnetic Field, you have
> not known about and I can show reactions you don't understand, so I
> offer an understanding. You don't agree with my understanding, so I
> tell you how to build something very simple to build and you will not
> build it or come here and test. Do you really want me to quit trying
> to help you understand?
> Why do the "Poles swap on the Sun"? What about Earth? Can you cause
> these reactions? I show cause and effect on my website, when the
> Permanent Magnet is viewed as the Earth. We all know that the Earth
> has sped up, and I show what happens when it speeds up, what I call
> Wardforce changes from backward motion, to forward motion.
> Energy-Ingenuity.com
Not that I have ascribed any credibility to your verbal meanderings,
I did happen to notice in this one that you used the Earth in analogy
to a permanent magnet. You note "what happens when it speeds up".
What you call "changes from backward motion, to forward motion".
So the Earth was somehow going backwards? An increase of speed
somehow represents a change from backward motion? Please explain
in words that even I can understand. This is your chance. Convince me
as you expect me to explain it to your often-mentioned school children.
Posted by Energy-Ingenuity on June 19, 2011, 12:16 pm
> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > > We know that a radio wave has force, we use the second wave to push
> > > > the first wave, the third too push the second... I am saying this
> > > > radio wave, as you know it has another part,
> > > Totally BullShit...... Where did you find such crap? What Publication?
> > > Your so full of it, your eyes are brown.....
> > You and Vaughn,
> > What law of physics relates to these 3 speeds, causing 3 different
> > reactions? Anyone can build one, even the ya'll, then test can be
> > conducted and you will know my claims are true. You even have
> > options, come here and test if you don't want to build one or have one
> > built.
> > I show on video that a Permanent Magnet is rotated, with out
> > bearings, surrounded by a ferrous material and the Magnet does not
> > lose it's Field. I am using a part of the Magnetic Field, you have
> > not known about and I can show reactions you don't understand, so I
> > offer an understanding. You don't agree with my understanding, so I
> > tell you how to build something very simple to build and you will not
> > build it or come here and test. Do you really want me to quit trying
> > to help you understand?
> > Why do the "Poles swap on the Sun"? What about Earth? Can you cause
> > these reactions? I show cause and effect on my website, when the
> > Permanent Magnet is viewed as the Earth. We all know that the Earth
> > has sped up, and I show what happens when it speeds up, what I call
> > Wardforce changes from backward motion, to forward motion.
> > Energy-Ingenuity.com
> Not that I have ascribed any credibility to your verbal meanderings,
> I did happen to notice in this one that you used the Earth in analogy
> to a permanent magnet. You note "what happens when it speeds up".
> What you call "changes from backward motion, to forward motion".
> So the Earth was somehow going backwards? An increase of speed
> somehow represents a change from backward motion? Please explain
> in words that even I can understand. This is your chance. Convince me
> as you expect me to explain it to your often-mentioned school children.
Michael,
What I am saying is that backward motion (pulling force), and forward
motion (pushing force) can be controlled by speed. Without changing
the Poles, these reactions are controlled! What Law of Physics claims
anything about different speeds causing different reactions, with
regards to needed input? Come here so you can test some of these
devices built, or build one so you can test, then you will know how it
works. It will help knowing what you are looking for, so you will be
able to find it. Put 2 magnets on a table, while they just set there,
nothing happens. When you add motion, reactions are caused, this
motion can also be controlled by motion! It is not the Poles that
swap, it is Wardforce, forward and backward motion or push, pull, what
ever word you want to use for describing these reactions!
YES, THIS IS ALL VERIFIABLE WITH PHYSICAL DEVICES! COME SEE, TEST,
BUILD or have one built! I have not seen anyone give cause and effect
with respect to the Sun's Poles changing or the Earth, only that it
happens. Do you see how I demonstrate these reactions on video and
try to share this cause and effect with others. If we don't teach
others what we have learned, what good does it do for the future of
our children, or ... mankind?
Can you answer my question? What law of Physics refers to, when
changing speed, 3 different reactions are caused, with regards to
input requirement? If we have never seen a Tree before, can you
describe a Pine Tree? I am talking about something that cannot be
seen, held or touched and the only way you know it exists, is by the
reactions cause. I tell you the reactions caused, show on video,
invite you to come here for testing, give drawings for building a
device, show an US patent, show US patent pending, give reference of
witnesses, ... Do you really think I would be able to show all this
and it not be true? Do you really think that High Schools, like
Livingston High School, would let me demonstrate to their children
with out knowing my claims are true?
energy-ingenuity.com
PS I will be putting another video on my website by the end of June
2011, watch for it.
Posted by Curbie on June 16, 2011, 7:18 am
Another attempt at evading the answer to why Laws of Physics don't
apply to this scam.
>What law of Physics refers to 3 speeds, will cause 3 different reactions, with
regards to anything?
Laws of Physics apply to reality not fairytales, and that's why
fairytales don't comply with the laws of Physics. No so complicated,
is it.
>Videos, US patent, drawings, list of ..., physical proof come see for yourself!
We've all seen Hollywood videos and artist drawings of all kinds of
fantasies, but most people don't confuse those with reality as far as
your patent that's for a simple generator or alternator and NO WHERE
does it reference this magic "Ward-farce" that you use to try to make
these claims believable.
As far as your and all other scammers that invite me to see their
magic that don't comply with the laws of Physics, why didn't ANY, NOT
ONE of the energy corporation, or professors and teachers you claimed
to have demonstrated this to, see your "physical proof", they all got
to see a working device, "demonstrated" by the patent holder.
If you couldn't scam those professionals, what make you think you'll
any better luck with me, you can't even keep all your lies straight???
...But still you keep posting your gibberish and asking for donations
without shame.
This is a flat-out SCAM, by a known scammer.
Curbie
> > > >> We know that a radio wave has force, we use the second wave to push
> > > >> the first wave, the third too push the second... I am saying this
> > >> > radio wave, as you know it has another part,
> > >> Totally BullShit...... Where did you find such crap? What Publication?
> > >> Your so full of it, your eyes are brown.....
> > >You and Vaughn,
> > No, let's get back to you twice lying about the US Patent office in your strange
> > attempt to bolster your bogus claims.
> > Do you stand by your own word or not?
> > Vaughn
> Vaughn,
> The point I was trying to make is; Some people think that they know
> everything! It was not the Patent Office that said this, only the
> director of it, in 1899 (1800's). I answered you questions, now what
> about the questions I have asked? What law of physics refers to, by
> changing the speed only, 3 different reactions are caused with respect
> to the input requirement? How am I violating these 1st and 2nd laws
> of Thermodynamics? I am showing and saying that these reactions are
> caused by something that has been isolated, not out of thin air!
> Energy-Ingenuity.com
> PS I put another drawing and video on my website, this week. We are
> working on another video that I will be posting by the end of June
> 2011.