Posted by T. Keating on April 1, 2011, 8:09 pm
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:31:24 -0400, "vaughn"
>> Looks like the Beta count data faked, it probably had a cork stuck
>> over the sensor, or the data was edited. Most likely to prevent the
>> US Navy from catching flack for out gassing from docked carriers &
>> n-subs.
>More unsupported utter nonsense from Keating. It seems that when Keating finds
>data that doesn't support his preconceived notions, he just invents whatever
>explanation works for him, then posts it as fact.
http://enenews.com/radioactive-iodine-131-in-rainwater-sample-near-san-francisco-is-18100-above-federal-drinking-water-standard
"Radioactive Iodine-131 in rainwater sample near San Francisco was
18,100% above federal drinking water standard"
March 31st, 2011
So, I guess all that I-131 in the Frisco's ground water was smuggled
in by submarine???
The more people look, the more obvious it becomes that the EPA was
lying and hiding the truth.
I would charge the whole lot of them with treason(death sentence).
Right up the chain of command.
Posted by vaughn on April 1, 2011, 8:46 pm
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:31:24 -0400, "vaughn"
>>
>>> Looks like the Beta count data faked, it probably had a cork stuck
>>> over the sensor, or the data was edited. Most likely to prevent the
>>> US Navy from catching flack for out gassing from docked carriers &
>>> n-subs.
>>
>>More unsupported utter nonsense from Keating. It seems that when Keating
>>finds
>>data that doesn't support his preconceived notions, he just invents whatever
>>explanation works for him, then posts it as fact.
>
http://enenews.com/radioactive-iodine-131-in-rainwater-sample-near-san-francisco-is-18100-above-federal-drinking-water-standard
> "Radioactive Iodine-131 in rainwater sample near San Francisco was
> 18,100% above federal drinking water standard"
> March 31st, 2011
> So, I guess all that I-131 in the Frisco's ground water was smuggled
> in by submarine???
> The more people look, the more obvious it becomes that the EPA was
> lying and hiding the truth.
> I would charge the whole lot of them with treason(death sentence).
> Right up the chain of command.
Your claim was: "Looks like the Beta count data faked, it probably had a cork
stuck
>> over the sensor, or the data was edited. Most likely to prevent the
>> US Navy from catching flack for out gassing from docked carriers &
>> n-subs."
Please give us references to your evidence for the above claim.
Vaughn
Posted by vaughn on March 29, 2011, 3:50 pm
> Where do you get this information? Any citation?
You have things backwards! It's T. Keating who made the statement:
>> "The meltdown in Japan probably just removed a couple years of lifespan
>> from people who live in North America."
That's an absolutely wild claim. He needs to provide a reference, retract the
claim, or disappear into an embarrassed silence. Folks should not be allowed to
spread such utter crap without being challenged.
Vaughn
Posted by T. Keating on March 29, 2011, 8:47 pm
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:50:02 -0400, "vaughn"
>>
>> Where do you get this information? Any citation?
>You have things backwards! It's T. Keating who made the statement:
>>> "The meltdown in Japan probably just removed a couple years of lifespan
>>> from people who live in North America."
>That's an absolutely wild claim. He needs to provide a reference, retract the
>claim, or disappear into an embarrassed silence. Folks should not be allowed
to
>spread such utter crap without being challenged.
Japan is a long way from sequestering this nightmare....
From what I read, reactor #2 has suffered a primary containment
breach.. I.E. The Core has melted through the bottom primary
containment vessel.
Radiation are levels spiking., which may force total evacuation of the
site. Whole sale dumping of radioactive core contents into the ocean
is occurring.
Fukushima reactors have close to fifty times the initial food
chain/extremely dangerous radio-isotope inventory at risk when
compared to reactor #4 @ Chernobyl (operating @ full power for less
than 2 years prior to meltdown.).
Note: Chernobyl was only a partial release, thus one could add
another 2x-4x multiplier. And don't forget reactor Fukushima #3 was
fueled with MOX, plus an additional MOX in the adjacent spent fuel
pool.
This situation is bad.. real bad.. and it's not looking like it will
be contained anytime soon
Plus one only need look at the REAL consequences of that past
incidents and recognize the reality of the "No Threshold Dose(US NAS)"
to make the proper judgement calls.
http://books.google.com/books?id=g34tNlYOB3AC&pg=PA209&lpg=PA209&dq=ukrainian+mortality+rate+before+chernobyl&source=bl&ots=O15UfQ1Va7&sig=j1bT3W8gvUron-9osUDCfcMSaio&hl=en&ei=HzuSTfmxGcTagQeDt6AZ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved CoQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=ukrainian%20mortality%20rate%20before%20chernobyl&f=false
My area South Florida, (~7500 miles distant), just got hit by a third
wave of fallout.
It's been raining lately, which cleans out most of the airborne
stuff, but now that fallout will be incorporated into the water supply
and the food chain. Isotope half lifes are long enough to impact
many generations beyond.
Posted by vaughn on March 29, 2011, 10:40 pm
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:50:02 -0400, "vaughn"
>>>> "The meltdown in Japan probably just removed a couple years of lifespan
>>>> from people who live in North America."
>>
>>That's an absolutely wild claim. He needs to provide a reference, retract the
>>claim, or disappear into an embarrassed silence. Folks should not be allowed
>>to
>>spread such utter crap without being challenged.
>>
> Japan is a long way from sequestering this nightmare....
Lots of arm-waving but no support for your claim ">>>>The meltdown in Japan
probably just removed a couple years of lifespan
>>>> from people who live in North America."
Please point us to the scientific source where you got that information about
the two years loss of lifespan..
Thanks!
Vaughn
XML site map
>> over the sensor, or the data was edited. Most likely to prevent the
>> US Navy from catching flack for out gassing from docked carriers &
>> n-subs.
>More unsupported utter nonsense from Keating. It seems that when Keating finds
>data that doesn't support his preconceived notions, he just invents whatever
>explanation works for him, then posts it as fact.