Posted by LectronNuis on June 22, 2010, 10:51 pm
wmbjkREMOVE@citlink.net wrote in:
>On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:19:08 +1000, LectronNuis
/clip
>>No flame war starting here Wayne.
>>I make you the same offer I made Mike-"mII", thinking it
>>was Mike-"mII".
>>whisp3r at fastmail.fm
>>.. will get me giving a full version.
>>
>>cheers
>>
>>LN
>It did cross my mind that the mII posts might be gymmy bob forgeries,
>since I didn't remember mII being nuts, since I'd been reminding
>readers that josepi is gymmy bob, benji, et al, and since his only
>response to such things is to blurt out more lies under yet another
>nym. But it doesn't matter much. I was replying to whomever wrote the
>post, no matter what name he goes by.
Some history to "update" you Wayne.
Mike was last seen headed for the hills after a serious of posts "outing"
his location and - IIRC - workplace. No doubt all posted by GymmyBob.
This, some years ago now.
Today's mII is a different persona in the sense
of UPA - Usenet Performance Art.
Almost a conscious sterility today.. mII _was_ a bloke of wit and
sharp observation.
There is evidence GB is again using more than one identifiable
nym in a single NG, and being consistent with it.
Fine, should he 'behave', under any nym.
That is Usenet today.. sorry as I am to have to report that.
Seems today's "electronic social butterfly" is not happy
just taking a sip of one flower.. the urge to suck them all dry
is just irresistible.
/clip
>Please let me know if you hear from the real Mike.
After more than a month, I don't believe it is going to
happen, Wayne
Whomsoever using the nym has no intention of contacting
myself. So, for me, the answer to the question I would put
has been given, quite plainly.
I thank you for your time and take my leave having
"done my bit".
cheers
LN
Posted by m II on June 23, 2010, 12:39 am
wmbjkREMOVE@citlink.net wrote:
>
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> <snipped usual list of lies>
>>>
>>> Any readers unfamiliar with ghinius ghio can find a collection of his
>>> assorted wisdumb at http://www.citlink.net/~wmbjk/tbfduwisdumb.htm . He
>>> says that he *wants* people to read it. LOL
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>
>> Grow the fuck up!
>>
>> Are you over 12 years old?
>
> What difference would it make how old I am? I don't accept people
> telling lies about me or others, which is the only contribution that
> ghio has made here for *years*. Nor do I accept idiots trying to sell
> their "design" services here at the same time they're lecturing on
> such things as the use of 300k wire and 150A rheostats for generator
> field control. Normally I'd say that if you don't like reading my
> posts, then stop doing that. But I suspect that advice might be a bit
> complicated for you, so I'll shorten it to "blow me".
>
> Wayne
>
Everyone here should be made aware that Gymmie Boob is using my name
to insult people.
I did NOT send any garbage posts or insult anyone.
mike
Posted by Josepi on June 23, 2010, 5:59 am
LIAR!
Path:
npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe01.iad.POSTED!6606bf4c!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.solar.photovoltaic,alt.energy.homepower
Subject: Re: Do power substations have automatic voltage regulation equipment?
Lines: 49
Organization: news.google.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 02:00:30 UTC
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:29:02 +0930
> Josepi wrote:
>> Backfeeding would become a problem as the voltage on the PV side would be
>> seens as high and the tapchanger woul go the wrong way. Advance CPU units
>> have current direction sensing to prevent this and grid-tie units are not
>> supposed to feed when the grid is down.
> Gymmie, Gymmie...the pile keeps getting deeper and deeper.
> Two thousand watts produced per household in one area would have NO
> effect whatever on the grid line voltage. The community in which this
> power would be produced would use it all up. 2KW on a 240 volt house
> feed is about 8 amperes. The ratio of the sum of all the dryers, ranges,
> lighting and car block heaters going compared to 8 lousy amperes is
> pretty small.
> Now, it does mean the grid would supply a little bit less of the total,
> but nowhere near enough of a drop in current to make the line voltage
> rise to ANY noticeable degree.
> I've been looking at your past posts and notice you were a child
> medicine expert before becoming a transformer expert. Giving mood
> altering tranquilizers to children is disgusting. Remember that?
> Now, you've been a Transformer Design Engineer for over twenty years.
> You told us that just before you said a fifty Hertz transformer needs
> twice the core size of a sixty Hertz version.
> Give it up, fraud....and please spare me the oh so predictable attacks
> by one of your other five newsgroup personas.
> mike
What are you some kind of child? You sure act like one
--
mike
_______________________________________________________________________
>Everyone here should be made aware that Gymmie Boob is using my name
>to insult people.
>I did NOT send any garbage posts or insult anyone.
>mike
Posted by Josepi on June 23, 2010, 9:47 am
Apologies to any involved. Somebody's itsy bitsy feelings got hurt when
their troll accont was cancelled, apparently.
Now the clones are at work.
Not my posts.
LIAR!
Path:
npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe01.iad.POSTED!6606bf4c!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.solar.photovoltaic,alt.energy.homepower
References:
Subject: Re: Do power substations have automatic voltage regulation
equipment?
Lines: 49
Organization: news.google.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 02:00:30 UTC
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:29:02 +0930
> Josepi wrote:
>> Backfeeding would become a problem as the voltage on the PV side would be
>> seens as high and the tapchanger woul go the wrong way. Advance CPU units
>> have current direction sensing to prevent this and grid-tie units are not
>> supposed to feed when the grid is down.
> Gymmie, Gymmie...the pile keeps getting deeper and deeper.
> Two thousand watts produced per household in one area would have NO
> effect whatever on the grid line voltage. The community in which this
> power would be produced would use it all up. 2KW on a 240 volt house
> feed is about 8 amperes. The ratio of the sum of all the dryers, ranges,
> lighting and car block heaters going compared to 8 lousy amperes is
> pretty small.
> Now, it does mean the grid would supply a little bit less of the total,
> but nowhere near enough of a drop in current to make the line voltage
> rise to ANY noticeable degree.
> I've been looking at your past posts and notice you were a child
> medicine expert before becoming a transformer expert. Giving mood
> altering tranquilizers to children is disgusting. Remember that?
> Now, you've been a Transformer Design Engineer for over twenty years.
> You told us that just before you said a fifty Hertz transformer needs
> twice the core size of a sixty Hertz version.
> Give it up, fraud....and please spare me the oh so predictable attacks
> by one of your other five newsgroup personas.
> mike
What are you some kind of child? You sure act like one
--
mike
_______________________________________________________________________
>Everyone here should be made aware that Gymmie Boob is using my name
>to insult people.
>I did NOT send any garbage posts or insult anyone.
>mike
Posted by vaughn on June 15, 2010, 11:09 am
> You called them "constant" current sources earlier, I think that's what
> Vaugn objects to, as would I.
Actually, one poster called PV panels "current sources. Not voltage sources"
that statement is, on its face, wrong. Then another upped the ante by calling
PV panels "Constant current sources". That is even more wrong! (Though I would
not seriously argue with "quasi constant current sources") I understand that
these nice folks are simply repeating wisdom that they have read elsewhere, but
that does not make then correct.
If PV panels were truly "constant current sources" there would be no advantage
to an MPPT controller. I don't have one of those expensive controllers, so that
is why I can daily see my panel's current output vary inversely with their load.
Vaughn
XML site map