Posted by Morris Dovey on March 8, 2011, 11:08 pm
On 3/8/11 4:57 PM, Curbie wrote:
> Morris,
>> It's a bit easier to see here:
> It is.
>> The obvious advantage in my pumping context is that the pump can (also)
>> keep the tracking reservoir filled.
> At a cost, I wonder how much water it take to drive that tracker on a
> daily basis???
I don't know - Daniel just got his prototype working. It appears to be
cobbled together using bicycle parts and pop/beer cans - which should be
available in a lot of developing areas.
I'd be willing to bet dollars against doughnuts that it'll see a fair
amount of improvement. (I have a few [half-baked] ideas of my own) :)
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Posted by sno on March 8, 2011, 9:06 pm
On 3/8/2011 5:02 AM, Morris Dovey wrote:
> Query was posted to news:alt.solar.thermal, news:alt.energy.homepower,
> and http://iedu.com/DeSoto/SC_Madison/SC_Plan.html on February 8, 2011
> and results were tallied on March 8, 2011.
> 207 visits to web page in February
> +51 visits to web page in March
> ---
> 258 total visits to web page
> -8 e-mails expressing interest ("yes" votes)
> ---
> 250 not interested enough to respond ("no" votes)
> Effort required to produce a reasonable quality How-To: 1+ month.
> One respondent indicated a willingness to pay up to US$0 maximum.
> Conclusion: There's not enough interest to justify the time and effort
> needed to produce a good How-To document.
> My thanks to all who visited/responded.
Just wondering how much you calculate would make it worth your time and
effort....
thank you much....have fun....sno
--
Correct Scientific Terminology:
Hypothesis - a guess as to why or how something occurs
Theory - a hypothesis that has been checked by enough experiments
to be generally assumed to be true.
Law - a hypothesis that has been checked by enough experiments
in enough different ways that it is assumed to be truer then a theory.
Note: nothing is proven in science, things are assumed to be true.
Posted by Morris Dovey on March 8, 2011, 9:56 pm
On 3/8/11 3:06 PM, sno wrote:
> Just wondering how much you calculate would make it worth your time and
> effort....
> thank you much....have fun....sno
At 3%, the idea had a lower approval rating (among folks with an
interest in solar heating) than George Bush's foreign policy.
What's to calculate?
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
Posted by Curbie on March 8, 2011, 11:22 pm
Morris,
In order to compare the merit of two plans (active to passive or
passive to passive) it seems that someone would need both plans. The
thing I like about your passive collector is cost, size, and the
ability to retrofit them to an existing structure, a lot of passive
plans require the space and cost of mass thermal and large amounts of
costly thermal glass.
If you don't have time... you don't have time, just seems a shame to
abandon let hard earned knowledge.
Curbie
Posted by Morris Dovey on March 9, 2011, 12:52 am
On 3/8/11 5:22 PM, Curbie wrote:
> In order to compare the merit of two plans (active to passive or
> passive to passive) it seems that someone would need both plans. The
> thing I like about your passive collector is cost, size, and the
> ability to retrofit them to an existing structure, a lot of passive
> plans require the space and cost of mass thermal and large amounts of
> costly thermal glass.
The original goal was to arrive at a commercial product that the
construction folks could treat like a standard window unit or pre-hung
door, and that could be installed in a conventional structure to reduce
heating costs.
The installable module approach turned out to be a good idea, and (to
even my surprise) an exploration of the physics led to a panel capable
of delivering 100% of the heat for an ordinary, conventional structure.
One of the things I learned was that an active panel _cannot_ outperform
a sufficiently well-designed passive panel. At first that seems
counter-intuitive - but it's true, because efficiency doesn't come from
a fan.
What seems difficult for most people to keep in mind is that it's all
about heating _air_ (or water or whatever) rather than any of the
panel's parts. To build a /really/ efficient panel, the design needs to
operate at the absolutely lowest temperature possible, and the
difference between the warmest panel parts and the collection media
lowered to an absolute minimum.
> If you don't have time... you don't have time, just seems a shame to
> abandon let hard earned knowledge.
The knowledge hasn't been abandoned. I've been shoveling everything I
have into a USB FLASH drive. In addition, there are panels scattered
across the US and Canada to backup the data.
Right now there are a billion and a half people experiencing severe
water crises. See:
http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR06-complete.pdf
for details. I think I know how to solve that problem, but it's going to
take everything I've got and all the help I can beg to get the job done.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/
>> It's a bit easier to see here:
> It is.
>> The obvious advantage in my pumping context is that the pump can (also)
>> keep the tracking reservoir filled.
> At a cost, I wonder how much water it take to drive that tracker on a
> daily basis???