Posted by Coffee's For Closers on December 21, 2008, 12:41 am
me@privacy.net says...
>
> >However this device will teach you how to save electricity and give you
> >instant feedback on your savings, so I guess it would be an excellent
> >training aid.
> Yeah I'm just wondering if anyone out there has tried
> one
>
> And if its worth the $100!
Are you referring to the whole-house meter thing?
If I were to concerned with micro-managing, I would buy something
like a "Kill-A-Watt" device:
http://www.p3international.com/products/special/P4400/P4400-
CE.html
(Beware the line break in the URL.)
This place is selling them for US$15:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16882715001&n
m_mc=OTC-Froogle&cm_mmc=OTC-Froogle-_-Electronic+Gadgets-_-
P3+International-_-82715001
(Beware the line break in the URL.)
It measures one item at a time, so you can see the exact amount
used by your computer, or your television, or any individual item
that plugs into a wall outlet.
This can help you to figure out how much it costs to do a load of
laundry. Or the operating cost of an old refrigerator or CRT
monitor, to estimate the financial payback of buying a newer,
more efficient one.
A hot water cylinder is a major power-hog, but may be difficult
to measure. Mine doesn't have any place to insert a Kill-A-Watt
type meter for measurement over time. I think a clamp-on multi
meter can be used to see the consumption, although I could also
just turn everything else off, and see how fast the main meter
feeding my apartment runs. But that still doesn't tell how many
hours the water cylinder runs on an average day. OTOH, that
Black And Decker unit wouldn't work for that, either.
Anyway, as mentioned by another poster, these devices only give
you numbers. The savings come from physically doing other things
to actually reduce your usage.
Personally, I don't feel any great urge to buy any of these
devices. I have already made conservation efforts, with
weatherstripping, CFL bulbs, warm clothes, etc. My fridge (owned
by me) is relatively new, as is my water cylinder (in a rented
flat.)
I do still use a CRT monitor, but I got it for free, and have two
spares (also for free.) And I suppose I tend towards enjoying
power-gulping hot showers.
But I still qualify for my provider's "Low User" plan. Which is
another thing to look for. This is a way of balancing the flat
daily connection fee versus the per-KWH usage fee. So, if my
consumption is below a certain KWH per month threshold, this
billing plan costs less compared to the regular plan.
Availability depends on your location and provider.
Also, Kill-A-Watt type device would be more cost and hassle,
since I am on 240-volt, 50-hz. And, for some strange reason,
there is limited availability of that version.
--
Earn Money With Your Web Site
http://www.WebSponsorZone.Net
Web Site Advertising Directory
Posted by Tim Jackson on December 21, 2008, 6:27 am
Coffee's For Closers wrote:
> me@privacy.net says...
> A hot water cylinder is a major power-hog, but may be difficult
> to measure. Mine doesn't have any place to insert a Kill-A-Watt
> type meter for measurement over time. I think a clamp-on multi
> meter can be used to see the consumption, although I could also
> just turn everything else off, and see how fast the main meter
> feeding my apartment runs. But that still doesn't tell how many
> hours the water cylinder runs on an average day. OTOH, that
> Black And Decker unit wouldn't work for that, either.
>
> Anyway, as mentioned by another poster, these devices only give
> you numbers. The savings come from physically doing other things
> to actually reduce your usage.
>
>
It's easier and cheaper to measure such things with an hour meter than a
power meter. The power consumption of (e.g.) a water heater when
switched on is pretty constant, it is usually written on a rating plate,
and you can check it any time with a multimeter. The big variable is
the on-time, and you can record this by simply connecting a time
recorder across the element terminals. LCD hour recorders cost about
£10 here in the UK, and only require wiring to existing terminals on the
heater or thermostat.
The same technique can also be applied to non-electrical devices such as
central heating burners, by connecting to the thermostat or control valve.
Tim Jackson
Posted by harry on December 21, 2008, 4:09 pm
> Coffee's For Closers wrote:
> > m...@privacy.net says...
> > A hot water cylinder is a major power-hog, but may be difficult
> > to measure. Mine doesn't have any place to insert a Kill-A-Watt
> > type meter for measurement over time. I think a clamp-on multi
> > meter can be used to see the consumption, although I could also
> > just turn everything else off, and see how fast the main meter
> > feeding my apartment runs. But that still doesn't tell how many
> > hours the water cylinder runs on an average day. OTOH, that
> > Black And Decker unit wouldn't work for that, either.
> > Anyway, as mentioned by another poster, these devices only give
> > you numbers. The savings come from physically doing other things
> > to actually reduce your usage.
> It's easier and cheaper to measure such things with an hour meter than a
> power meter. The power consumption of (e.g.) a water heater when
> switched on is pretty constant, it is usually written on a rating plate,
> and you can check it any time with a multimeter. The big variable is
> the on-time, and you can record this by simply connecting a time
> recorder across the element terminals. LCD hour recorders cost about
> £10 here in the UK, and only require wiring to existing terminals on the
> heater or thermostat.
> The same technique can also be applied to non-electrical devices such as
> central heating burners, by connecting to the thermostat or control valve.
> Tim Jackson
Or indeed you could use a mains powered electric clock. Set to 12 o'
clock & you can count up to twelve hours for nothing. (Assuming you
have one to hand :-)
Posted by harry on December 22, 2008, 3:05 pm
On Dec 22, 4:52 am, david.willi...@bayman.org (David Williams) wrote:
> -> Or indeed you could use a mains powered electric clock. Set to 12 o'
> -> clock & you can count up to twelve hours for nothing. (Assuming you
> -> have one to hand :-)
> But a lot of those clocks that use synchronous motors are equally
> capable of running forward or backward. Unless you have something that
> sets the rotor turning in the right direction when the power comes on,
> you could end up with highly puzzling readings!
> dow
If you look at a clock synchronous motor there are a couple of thick
copper loops on the stator that create a revolving flux that starts
the motor in exactly the same way as some single phase induction
motors. Without, it would need "flicking" to make it revolve at all.
If you want to reverse this motor, you have to take the stator apart
and physically turn it over. Unless the shaft projects out of both
ends of the motor that is.
No-one wants a clock to run backwards.
This is the traditional motor, nowadays (if you can even find a non
battery clock) they work with a peizo-electric crystal thingy. &
usually have a radio on them as well!
Posted by daestrom on December 22, 2008, 5:03 pm
harry wrote:
> On Dec 22, 4:52 am, david.willi...@bayman.org (David Williams) wrote:
>> -> Or indeed you could use a mains powered electric clock. Set to 12
>> o'
>> -> clock & you can count up to twelve hours for nothing. (Assuming
>> you
>> -> have one to hand :-)
>>
>> But a lot of those clocks that use synchronous motors are equally
>> capable of running forward or backward. Unless you have something
>> that sets the rotor turning in the right direction when the power
>> comes on, you could end up with highly puzzling readings!
>>
>> dow
> If you look at a clock synchronous motor there are a couple of thick
> copper loops on the stator that create a revolving flux that starts
> the motor in exactly the same way as some single phase induction
> motors. Without, it would need "flicking" to make it revolve at all.
> If you want to reverse this motor, you have to take the stator apart
> and physically turn it over. Unless the shaft projects out of both
> ends of the motor that is.
> No-one wants a clock to run backwards.
Curiously, my local barber has a clock that runs backwards. And the numbers
are painted on the face backward.
While sitting in the chair getting a haircut, it looks perfectly normal in
the mirror. I get a kick out of it everytime I look at it in the mirror :-)
daestrom
> >However this device will teach you how to save electricity and give you
> >instant feedback on your savings, so I guess it would be an excellent
> >training aid.
> Yeah I'm just wondering if anyone out there has tried
> one
>
> And if its worth the $100!