Posted by Bret Cahill on April 26, 2009, 3:03 am
> >> > But there was no mention of any radiation given off so whatever is
> >> > happening, it would seem to be something that doesn't fit into our
> >> > current understanding.
> >> If there was enough anomalous heat to detect, I'd think there should be
> >> enough He to detect with a mass spec. �That would be a lot more
> >> convincing than measuring tiny differences between heat in and out.
> > And a tiny difference between heat in and out is of no use anyway.
> From an engineering viewpoint, that's true enough. �But if unmistakably
> anomalous energy could be shown, it might lead to new scientific
> understanding. �Think of Rutherford and the backscattered alphas:
Why not first eliminate all the forms of energy that are easy to
detect. After all those are ruled out _then_ start looking at energy
that's nearly impossible to detect.
Bret Cahill
Posted by Androcles on April 28, 2009, 4:09 pm
>>Look, Stooopid,
> You sure like names don't you? Name-calling is a sure sign of someone who
> really doesn't have anything useful to add to the conversation.
> Didn't your mother tall you how childish a habit that is?
> Vaughn
What does his mother's height have to do with anything?
Posted by Eeyore on May 9, 2009, 2:16 pm
Tom Potter wrote:
> >> > Tom Potter wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Careful Gisse!
> >>
> >> >> I got banned from Google Groups
> >> >> for pointing out the Jews have come into conflict
> >> >> with all of their neighbors throughout history,
> >>
> >> > Eric gets the Physics right, Potter gets it
> >> > wrong.. and doesn't even know why he is wrong.
> >>
> >> I think Sammy is all bent out of shape
> >> because Greer Ellis, Bill Bean, Lee Weymouth, and I
> >> used to hold seminars for stress analysis grunts like Sammy.
> >
> >Those who are ignorant of basic engineering and basic physics do not
> >hold seminars worth going to.
> It is not surprising to see that Eric Gisse who is a young
> Alaskan high school grad, does not know that Bill Bean was a great stress
analysis guru,
And what does that have to do with nuclear reactions ?
Graham
XML site map
> >> > happening, it would seem to be something that doesn't fit into our
> >> > current understanding.
> >> If there was enough anomalous heat to detect, I'd think there should be
> >> enough He to detect with a mass spec. �That would be a lot more
> >> convincing than measuring tiny differences between heat in and out.
> > And a tiny difference between heat in and out is of no use anyway.
> From an engineering viewpoint, that's true enough. �But if unmistakably
> anomalous energy could be shown, it might lead to new scientific
> understanding. �Think of Rutherford and the backscattered alphas: