Posted by Josepi on November 2, 2009, 11:36 pm
The group thinks you are showing a lot of poetic licence.
Another Wayne sock puppet that always pops up when S..S..S...S..Suspence
gets his self in toruble here, oh yeah, from the welding group.
It's quite obvious to the group members that your main technique is rabble
rousing. You think if you are the first to say "Plonk" then everybody will
follow. Trouble is, only the newbies ever see your text anymore.
>> I'd like to suggest that this newsgroup be renamed to:
>>
>> alt.energy.homepower.pointless-arguments
>>
>> since there seem to be a number of people that haven't (yet) simply
>> learned to ignore each other in favor of discussing actual home power
>> topics. Over half of the alleged postings over the last few days have
>> been back-and-forth arguments that look more like a couple of 5-year-olds
>> pointing fingers than actual reasoned and informative discussion.
>>
>> Either that, or ONE of the parties is going to have to show the maturity
>> and good judgement to simply refrain from responding to the others
>> taunts.
> How about you learn to use a Killfile... and let us folks who have been
> reading, and contributing, this newsgroup for a decade or more, continue
> on without your non-relevant comments.... We would appreciate it.....
Posted by You on November 3, 2009, 6:43 pm
wrote:
> The group thinks you are showing a lot of poetic licence.
>
> Another Wayne sock puppet that always pops up when S..S..S...S..Suspence
> gets his self in toruble here, oh yeah, from the welding group.
>
> It's quite obvious to the group members that your main technique is rabble
> rousing. You think if you are the first to say "Plonk" then everybody will
> follow. Trouble is, only the newbies ever see your text anymore.
Just "Who" are you replying to, and who elected you Group spokesperson?
"Welding Group", where did that come from? I posted to the OP original
Group.....
I didn't "Plonk" anyone, let alone, say I would....
and can you explain just why "newbies" wouldn't see my posts?
You Must be a Newbie who can't read Headers, and gets confused easily..
Oh, I see your in the UK.... that explains a lot....
Posted by wmbjkREMOVE on November 4, 2009, 12:19 am
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:50:44 -0700, wmbjkREMOVE@citlink.net wrote:
>>wrote:
>>
>>> The group thinks you are showing a lot of poetic licence.
>>>
>>> Another Wayne sock puppet that always pops up when S..S..S...S..Suspence
>>> gets his self in toruble here, oh yeah, from the welding group.
>>>
>>> It's quite obvious to the group members that your main technique is rabble
>>> rousing. You think if you are the first to say "Plonk" then everybody will
>>> follow. Trouble is, only the newbies ever see your text anymore.
>>
>>Just "Who" are you replying to, and who elected you Group spokesperson?
>>
>>"Welding Group", where did that come from? I posted to the OP original
>>Group.....
>>
>>I didn't "Plonk" anyone, let alone, say I would....
>>
>>and can you explain just why "newbies" wouldn't see my posts?
>>
>>You Must be a Newbie who can't read Headers, and gets confused easily..
>>Oh, I see your in the UK.... that explains a lot....
He's not new. He's Gymmy Bob, formerly solar flare and john p benji
(and some others I've forgotten) in the energy groups, plus a bunch of
other nyms according to the playmates he dragged here when he first
arrived. As I recall, he'd fled some knitting group or some such,
claimed to be an electric utility tech, and claimed to have both a
grid connected and an off-grid place. Said he lived in Canada and had
a place in US. Probably not a word of truth based on the ignorance he
displayed in his posts. The mysterious references to welding and tower
climbing were dead giveaways to his previous craaaaziness about those
subjects. As if the top posting nonsense wasn't enough by itself. The
last nutball claim I remember from his solar flare persona was that
battery charging turbines produce thousands of volts. His newest
claims are that he has a wind turbine with a 6' hub, and that he's
spent time in the dark because he doesn't know how to make batteries
last more than 5 years. Quack city.
Wayne
Posted by Josepi on November 4, 2009, 8:16 pm
Yes God.
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:50:44 -0700, wmbjkREMOVE@citlink.net wrote:
>>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The group thinks you are showing a lot of poetic licence.
>>>>
>>>> Another Wayne sock puppet that always pops up when
>>>> S..S..S...S..Suspence
>>>> gets his self in toruble here, oh yeah, from the welding group.
>>>>
>>>> It's quite obvious to the group members that your main technique is
>>>> rabble
>>>> rousing. You think if you are the first to say "Plonk" then everybody
>>>> will
>>>> follow. Trouble is, only the newbies ever see your text anymore.
>>>
>>>Just "Who" are you replying to, and who elected you Group spokesperson?
>>>
>>>"Welding Group", where did that come from? I posted to the OP original
>>>Group.....
>>>
>>>I didn't "Plonk" anyone, let alone, say I would....
>>>
>>>and can you explain just why "newbies" wouldn't see my posts?
>>>
>>>You Must be a Newbie who can't read Headers, and gets confused easily..
>>>Oh, I see your in the UK.... that explains a lot....
> He's not new. He's Gymmy Bob, formerly solar flare and john p benji
> (and some others I've forgotten) in the energy groups, plus a bunch of
> other nyms according to the playmates he dragged here when he first
> arrived. As I recall, he'd fled some knitting group or some such,
> claimed to be an electric utility tech, and claimed to have both a
> grid connected and an off-grid place. Said he lived in Canada and had
> a place in US. Probably not a word of truth based on the ignorance he
> displayed in his posts. The mysterious references to welding and tower
> climbing were dead giveaways to his previous craaaaziness about those
> subjects. As if the top posting nonsense wasn't enough by itself. The
> last nutball claim I remember from his solar flare persona was that
> battery charging turbines produce thousands of volts. His newest
> claims are that he has a wind turbine with a 6' hub, and that he's
> spent time in the dark because he doesn't know how to make batteries
> last more than 5 years. Quack city.
> Wayne
Posted by nospam on October 29, 2009, 2:37 am
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> nospam@nevis.com wrote:
>> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>>> nospam@nevis.com wrote:
>>>> TheM wrote:
>>>>>>> For net energy, a quarter per peak pv watt is needed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Even then, it would be many years after a quarter per watt for actual
breakeven, owing to all the previously lost energy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Huh? I usually agree with Don on these things, but here he seems to be
confusing energy break even with economic break even. I a
>>>>>> perfect world they might be comparable, but I doubt if that is true in
the real world.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vaughn
>>>>> I think what he wants to say is that energy break even is many years down
the road,
>>>>> possibly decades. And fixing and maintaining it might kill the small net
energy surplus.
>>>>> And before we get to break even we might have new, much better technology.
>>>>>
>>>>> M
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Who knows, but for a $.98 a watt it's a good deal if you want to give
>>>> it a go. I know I could run my home office off a couple of panels
>>>> (laptop, printer etc.)Even having a couple would keep the lights on
>>>> in an emergency.
>>>
>>> If there is enough sun to power the lights, you don't need them.
>>>
>>>
>> After 4pm six months of the year, yes I do need lights.
>
>
> The solar panels are worthless for that use without expensive, short
> lived batteries.
>
>
Tell that to my 10 year old UPS
XML site map
>>
>> alt.energy.homepower.pointless-arguments
>>
>> since there seem to be a number of people that haven't (yet) simply
>> learned to ignore each other in favor of discussing actual home power
>> topics. Over half of the alleged postings over the last few days have
>> been back-and-forth arguments that look more like a couple of 5-year-olds
>> pointing fingers than actual reasoned and informative discussion.
>>
>> Either that, or ONE of the parties is going to have to show the maturity
>> and good judgement to simply refrain from responding to the others
>> taunts.
> How about you learn to use a Killfile... and let us folks who have been
> reading, and contributing, this newsgroup for a decade or more, continue
> on without your non-relevant comments.... We would appreciate it.....