Posted by clare on June 23, 2011, 11:15 pm
wrote:
>>
>>15W LED v. 58W flourescent, not a hope.
>>
>>MBQ
>>
>>
>>-----------------------
>>
>>and very bad light colour.
>>
>>
>> mike
>Depends entirely where you NEED the light. The LED can provide as much
>light in a restricted area as the flourescent does - but will NOT
>light as large an area to that brightness. So the question is - how
>much light do you need and where???
>If the light scattered all over by the flourescent is needed - use
>flourescent. If it is just wasted (not needed anyway) try the LED
>solution.
>--------------------
>How does distribution affect light colour?
>Please re-read and comment appropriately.
> mike
I re-read it, and according to the net-nazi's my response was
correct. I bottom posted in response to the "15W LED v 58W
Flourescent, not a hope" which was on the same level (>>) as the very
bad light colour - so apparently the same message.
Get a life!!
Posted by Mho on June 24, 2011, 2:17 am
>>and very bad light colour.
>>
>>
>> mike
-----------------
>Depends entirely where you NEED the light. The LED can provide as much
>light in a restricted area as the flourescent does - but will NOT
>light as large an area to that brightness. So the question is - how
>much light do you need and where???
>If the light scattered all over by the flourescent is needed - use
>flourescent. If it is just wasted (not needed anyway) try the LED
>solution.
>--------------------
>How does distribution affect light colour?
>Please re-read and comment appropriately.
> mike
-----------------
I re-read it, and according to the net-nazi's my response was
correct. I bottom posted in response to the "15W LED v 58W
Flourescent, not a hope" which was on the same level (>>) as the very
bad light colour - so apparently the same message.
Get a life!!
---------------
You responded to my last post, not "15W LED v 58W Flourescent, not a
hope"and it your response was clearly a response to my "and very bad light
colour"
Hate to burst your bubble but it is very clear from the list of text (see
above in bottom posting sheeple style) that you did a threado.
I have a life and was trying to correct your oversight causing confusion.
Posted by Mho on June 24, 2011, 2:19 am
Oh brother!
There is no hope for that moronic, out of date, Forte, reader. There lies
your problem. The garbage relies on right carets (">") instead of the header
attributions and links,
Posted by Andy Burns on June 24, 2011, 3:25 am
Mho wrote:
> Oh brother!
>
> There is no hope for that moronic, out of date, Forte, reader. There
> lies your problem. The garbage relies on right carets (">") instead of
> the header attributions and links,
Agent and any number of newsreaders using headers *and* quote characters
are fine. IMHO it's your WLM v15 that's garbage, it makes your replies
indistinguishable from the messages you're replying to due to *lack* of
quote characters (> are not carets by the way). You even recognise this
yourself, as you try to compensate for it by inserting "------------"
separators by hand.
Posted by m II on June 24, 2011, 12:43 pm
"Andy Burns" wrote in message
Mho wrote:
> Oh brother!
> There is no hope for that moronic, out of date, Forte, reader. There
> lies your problem. The garbage relies on right carets (">") instead of
> the header attributions and links,
Agent and any number of newsreaders using headers *and* quote characters
are fine. IMHO it's your WLM v15 that's garbage, it makes your replies
indistinguishable from the messages you're replying to due to *lack* of
quote characters (> are not carets by the way). You even recognise this
yourself, as you try to compensate for it by inserting "------------"
separators by hand.
-----------------------
Wave of the future 'cause MS says so. Not much you can do about it 'cept get
a better reader.
mike
XML site map
>>15W LED v. 58W flourescent, not a hope.
>>
>>MBQ
>>
>>
>>-----------------------
>>
>>and very bad light colour.
>>
>>
>> mike
>Depends entirely where you NEED the light. The LED can provide as much
>light in a restricted area as the flourescent does - but will NOT
>light as large an area to that brightness. So the question is - how
>much light do you need and where???
>If the light scattered all over by the flourescent is needed - use
>flourescent. If it is just wasted (not needed anyway) try the LED
>solution.
>--------------------
>How does distribution affect light colour?
>Please re-read and comment appropriately.
> mike