Posted by Ulysses on June 12, 2009, 11:14 pm
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > Anyone happen to know if the poles on a single phase alternator field
> > coil
> >> > (rotor) are opposite such as they are on a 3-phase alternator? I
> > applied
> >> > *some* voltage to it but don't know how much is OK and don't want to
> > burn
> >> > it
> >> > out but it seems, so far, that the poles are the same on both sides
> > (i.e.
> >> > N
> >> > and N and not N on one side and S on the other). Also, would the
> >> > field
> >> > coil
> >> > be getting 120 volts on a 120/240 volt generator? I have this idea
> >> > but
> >> > before I waste my time I need to find out why it won't work ;-)
> >> >
> >>
> >> There should be one N and one S if it only has two poles. If more than
> >> that, it should alternate N, S, N, S and so on. The voltage applied to
> > the
> >> field winding is seldom anywhere near the same as the output voltage
and
> >> it's always DC. (although once in a while the rectifier is mounted
> >> right
> > on
> >> the rotor so you can apply AC to the rotor's slip rings).
> >>
> >> Typical car alternator uses DC on the field winding, applied via two
> >> slip
> >> rings. Although it is only one coil, the metal pieces on each side
have
> >> inter-woven fingers so that alternating 'fingers' are opposite polarity
> > (N,
> >> S, N, S as I mentioned above). One alternator has as many as 28
> >> 'fingers'
> >> so that's 14 N poles and 14 S poles, interwoven.
> >>
> >> Surprisingly, a rotor for a three-phase machine and a single-phase
> >> machine
> >> have the same number of poles and winding. The only difference between
> >> three-phase and single-phase is in the stator (armature) winding, not
> >> the
> >> rotor (field) winding.
> >>
> >> daestrom
> >>
> >>
> >
> > What I have in mind is to use a field coil from a single-phase
alternator
> > to
> > produce three-phase (or more) power by winding three coils (or six
> > perhaps)
> > for a new stator. This particular field coil has a tapered mount so it
> > would be direct-drive. It has slip rings so I could apply the
excitation
> > current directly and control it for the desired output. That all
depends
> > upon whether or not the coils are still OK. The generator I saved it
> > from
> > had a melted stator but the field coils appear to be OK but I'm not sure
> > if
> 3-phase motors already existed. Why bother? You can't increase more
> voltage and current because there is no room left to add. Bigger wire
> would mean lower voltage, high current output, you need both. You should
> forget about modifying existing motors, the reason is they are all glued
> with industrial Epoxy.
Actually I was thinking of rewiring an alternator but that gets me thinking
about using a 3-phase motor as an alternator. tI would be easier to find
couplings for a 1/2" or 5/8" shaft than for the Delco shaft. Is there some
easy way to determine the output from the specs on the motor? I don't care
much about frequency as I will be charging batteries directly.
> > it's one coil wound on two poles or two seperate coils. Like I said I
> > tried
> > applying some DC voltage and didn't get any definate answers but I did
> > get
> > quite a zap when I disconnected the DC source so something is still
> > working.
> > All I would need to do is to make a brush holder, mount the non-engine
> > end
> > in a bearing, and one way or another position the stator coils around
it.
> > And rectify it, of course. Since there is some residual magnetism in
the
> > field coil I think it will self-excite just like my Delco car alternator
> > does. But I don't know how much DC voltage it will need to excite and
> > end
> > up producing, say, 80 volts at 3600 rpm, but I think that will be
> > controlled by the number of turns on the stator coils. To answer Jim
> > Wilkins the coil was originally for a single-phase, 120/240 3600 rpm
> > generator but I would be running it at 3600 maximum and slowing down the
> > engine to control my output voltage (and adjusting the field current as
> > needed too). Before I get started I just want to be pretty sure of what
> > I
> > have to work with. It sounds like, from what everyone said, that the
> > pole
> > should be correct for my purposes. :-D
> >
> >
Posted by daestrom on June 9, 2009, 11:08 pm
>>
>>
>> > Anyone happen to know if the poles on a single phase alternator field
> coil
>> > (rotor) are opposite such as they are on a 3-phase alternator? I
> applied
>> > *some* voltage to it but don't know how much is OK and don't want to
> burn
>> > it
>> > out but it seems, so far, that the poles are the same on both sides
> (i.e.
>> > N
>> > and N and not N on one side and S on the other). Also, would the field
>> > coil
>> > be getting 120 volts on a 120/240 volt generator? I have this idea but
>> > before I waste my time I need to find out why it won't work ;-)
>> >
>>
>> There should be one N and one S if it only has two poles. If more than
>> that, it should alternate N, S, N, S and so on. The voltage applied to
> the
>> field winding is seldom anywhere near the same as the output voltage and
>> it's always DC. (although once in a while the rectifier is mounted right
> on
>> the rotor so you can apply AC to the rotor's slip rings).
>>
>> Typical car alternator uses DC on the field winding, applied via two slip
>> rings. Although it is only one coil, the metal pieces on each side have
>> inter-woven fingers so that alternating 'fingers' are opposite polarity
> (N,
>> S, N, S as I mentioned above). One alternator has as many as 28
>> 'fingers'
>> so that's 14 N poles and 14 S poles, interwoven.
>>
>> Surprisingly, a rotor for a three-phase machine and a single-phase
>> machine
>> have the same number of poles and winding. The only difference between
>> three-phase and single-phase is in the stator (armature) winding, not the
>> rotor (field) winding.
>>
>> daestrom
>>
>>
> What I have in mind is to use a field coil from a single-phase alternator
> to
> produce three-phase (or more) power by winding three coils (or six
> perhaps)
> for a new stator. This particular field coil has a tapered mount so it
> would be direct-drive. It has slip rings so I could apply the excitation
> current directly and control it for the desired output. That all depends
> upon whether or not the coils are still OK. The generator I saved it from
> had a melted stator but the field coils appear to be OK but I'm not sure
> if
> it's one coil wound on two poles or two seperate coils.
It may be either. The important question is just how many magnetic poles it
has. If it has one N and one S, it is a two-pole rotor. Two N's and two
S's means four pole and so on. Call this number N. It must be an even
number or you've got a consequent pole issue and I really, REALLY doubt that
for an alternator rotor.
If you want to wind a three-phase stator, you need 3*N number of coil groups
(we call them pole-phase groups). Then the next thing to do is then count
the slots in your stator (call it S) and hope that it is divisible by 3*N.
If it is evenly divisible by 3*N then you are almost ready. You need to
figure out how wide to make your coils (the coil pitch).
Commercial machines we would put all the coils in with the leads extending
out one end. The first few you leave one side of the coils 'up' out of the
slot until you work your way around the stator. Put one side of each coil
in the 'bottom' of a slot and move on. After you've put in one coil pitch
worth, you can put one side in the bottom of the next slow and the other
side in the 'top' of the first slot you started with, on top of the first
coil you laid.
After you have them all installed and wedged suitably tight in the slots,
you figure out how many coils connect together to form one phase group. If
you have a nice even stator, it comes out to S/(3*N). So a 72 slot stator,
for a four pole machine, you have 72/(3*4) = 6 coils that you connect
together into one phase group. When you're done with that step you should
have 3*N (in my example 12) phase groups.
Count off by 3 to see which ones are the same phase. If you imagine the
rotor in the middle of the stator and one pole directly over one phase
group, the other poles of the rotor will be directly over the other phase
groups of the same phase.
Connecting the individual phase groups together into each of the phases is
not hard, but it's much easier to show with a diagram than to explain in
words. But basically you can connect them either in series (more voltage)
or parallel (more available current).
BUt considering this is a seat-of-the-pants design, you might be best off by
insulating the leads and assembling it first one time, spin it up and see
how much voltage you get from one phase group. Then you can get an idea
what it's capable of.
If you want more current per coil but don't want to buy wire that is double
in size, you can use an old trick we used of winding your coils
'two-in-hand'. Simply use two strands of the same size wire and wind both
strands at the same time making half as many turns. You'll get half the
voltage but by soldering the two strands together at each end you get double
the cross-section.
> Like I said I tried
> applying some DC voltage and didn't get any definate answers but I did get
> quite a zap when I disconnected the DC source so something is still
> working.
Big coil around iron is a great inductor :-)
> All I would need to do is to make a brush holder, mount the non-engine end
> in a bearing, and one way or another position the stator coils around it.
> And rectify it, of course. Since there is some residual magnetism in the
> field coil I think it will self-excite just like my Delco car alternator
> does. But I don't know how much DC voltage it will need to excite and end
> up producing, say, 80 volts at 3600 rpm, but I think that will be
> controlled by the number of turns on the stator coils.
The first thing you want to figure out is what is the max DC current you can
push through the rotor. Take a look at the wire size to get an idea. Then
start out with your trials using only about 25% of what you think the max
is. This would be about the 'no-load field amps' operating point.
As the load is applied to an AC alternator, the DC field current has to be
increased quite a bit to keep the voltage constant.
> To answer Jim
> Wilkins the coil was originally for a single-phase, 120/240 3600 rpm
> generator but I would be running it at 3600 maximum and slowing down the
> engine to control my output voltage (and adjusting the field current as
> needed too). Before I get started I just want to be pretty sure of what I
> have to work with. It sounds like, from what everyone said, that the pole
> should be correct for my purposes. :-D
Okay, if it originally was 3600 rpm for 60Hz, then it is definitely a 2-pole
rotor. So for three-phase you'll need six pole-phase groups.
daestrom
Posted by Ulysses on June 10, 2009, 2:18 pm
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> > Anyone happen to know if the poles on a single phase alternator field
> > coil
> >> > (rotor) are opposite such as they are on a 3-phase alternator? I
> > applied
> >> > *some* voltage to it but don't know how much is OK and don't want to
> > burn
> >> > it
> >> > out but it seems, so far, that the poles are the same on both sides
> > (i.e.
> >> > N
> >> > and N and not N on one side and S on the other). Also, would the
field
> >> > coil
> >> > be getting 120 volts on a 120/240 volt generator? I have this idea
but
> >> > before I waste my time I need to find out why it won't work ;-)
> >> >
> >>
> >> There should be one N and one S if it only has two poles. If more than
> >> that, it should alternate N, S, N, S and so on. The voltage applied to
> > the
> >> field winding is seldom anywhere near the same as the output voltage
and
> >> it's always DC. (although once in a while the rectifier is mounted
right
> > on
> >> the rotor so you can apply AC to the rotor's slip rings).
> >>
> >> Typical car alternator uses DC on the field winding, applied via two
slip
> >> rings. Although it is only one coil, the metal pieces on each side
have
> >> inter-woven fingers so that alternating 'fingers' are opposite polarity
> > (N,
> >> S, N, S as I mentioned above). One alternator has as many as 28
> >> 'fingers'
> >> so that's 14 N poles and 14 S poles, interwoven.
> >>
> >> Surprisingly, a rotor for a three-phase machine and a single-phase
> >> machine
> >> have the same number of poles and winding. The only difference between
> >> three-phase and single-phase is in the stator (armature) winding, not
the
> >> rotor (field) winding.
> >>
> >> daestrom
> >>
> >>
> >
> > What I have in mind is to use a field coil from a single-phase
alternator
> > to
> > produce three-phase (or more) power by winding three coils (or six
> > perhaps)
> > for a new stator. This particular field coil has a tapered mount so it
> > would be direct-drive. It has slip rings so I could apply the
excitation
> > current directly and control it for the desired output. That all
depends
> > upon whether or not the coils are still OK. The generator I saved it
from
> > had a melted stator but the field coils appear to be OK but I'm not sure
> > if
> > it's one coil wound on two poles or two seperate coils.
> It may be either. The important question is just how many magnetic poles
it
> has. If it has one N and one S, it is a two-pole rotor. Two N's and two
> S's means four pole and so on. Call this number N. It must be an even
> number or you've got a consequent pole issue and I really, REALLY doubt
that
> for an alternator rotor.
There are two windings (not sure yet if it's two seperate windings or one
continuous wire) and they are wound around two iron cores. With *some*
voltage applied to the slip rings I was unable to determine the pole
directions by holding a permanant magnet up to each core. Not enough
voltage yet, I guess.
> If you want to wind a three-phase stator, you need 3*N number of coil
groups
> (we call them pole-phase groups). Then the next thing to do is then count
> the slots in your stator (call it S) and hope that it is divisible by 3*N.
> If it is evenly divisible by 3*N then you are almost ready. You need to
> figure out how wide to make your coils (the coil pitch).
> Commercial machines we would put all the coils in with the leads extending
> out one end. The first few you leave one side of the coils 'up' out of
the
> slot until you work your way around the stator. Put one side of each coil
> in the 'bottom' of a slot and move on. After you've put in one coil pitch
> worth, you can put one side in the bottom of the next slow and the other
> side in the 'top' of the first slot you started with, on top of the first
> coil you laid.
> After you have them all installed and wedged suitably tight in the slots,
> you figure out how many coils connect together to form one phase group.
If
> you have a nice even stator, it comes out to S/(3*N). So a 72 slot
stator,
> for a four pole machine, you have 72/(3*4) = 6 coils that you connect
> together into one phase group. When you're done with that step you should
> have 3*N (in my example 12) phase groups.
> Count off by 3 to see which ones are the same phase. If you imagine the
> rotor in the middle of the stator and one pole directly over one phase
> group, the other poles of the rotor will be directly over the other phase
> groups of the same phase.
> Connecting the individual phase groups together into each of the phases is
> not hard, but it's much easier to show with a diagram than to explain in
> words. But basically you can connect them either in series (more voltage)
> or parallel (more available current).
> BUt considering this is a seat-of-the-pants design, you might be best off
by
> insulating the leads and assembling it first one time, spin it up and see
> how much voltage you get from one phase group. Then you can get an idea
> what it's capable of.
> If you want more current per coil but don't want to buy wire that is
double
> in size, you can use an old trick we used of winding your coils
> 'two-in-hand'. Simply use two strands of the same size wire and wind both
> strands at the same time making half as many turns. You'll get half the
> voltage but by soldering the two strands together at each end you get
double
> the cross-section.
> > Like I said I tried
> > applying some DC voltage and didn't get any definate answers but I did
get
> > quite a zap when I disconnected the DC source so something is still
> > working.
> Big coil around iron is a great inductor :-)
> > All I would need to do is to make a brush holder, mount the non-engine
end
> > in a bearing, and one way or another position the stator coils around
it.
> > And rectify it, of course. Since there is some residual magnetism in
the
> > field coil I think it will self-excite just like my Delco car alternator
> > does. But I don't know how much DC voltage it will need to excite and
end
> > up producing, say, 80 volts at 3600 rpm, but I think that will be
> > controlled by the number of turns on the stator coils.
> The first thing you want to figure out is what is the max DC current you
can
> push through the rotor. Take a look at the wire size to get an idea.
Then
> start out with your trials using only about 25% of what you think the max
> is. This would be about the 'no-load field amps' operating point.
Yes, I don't want to melt the wires ;-) I tried using a "dead" 12 volt car
battery that only put out about 9 volts with no load and couldn't tell for
sure what the poles were. I guess it should be safe to try a good battery.
> As the load is applied to an AC alternator, the DC field current has to be
> increased quite a bit to keep the voltage constant.
> > To answer Jim
> > Wilkins the coil was originally for a single-phase, 120/240 3600 rpm
> > generator but I would be running it at 3600 maximum and slowing down the
> > engine to control my output voltage (and adjusting the field current as
> > needed too). Before I get started I just want to be pretty sure of what
I
> > have to work with. It sounds like, from what everyone said, that the
pole
> > should be correct for my purposes. :-D
> Okay, if it originally was 3600 rpm for 60Hz, then it is definitely a
2-pole
> rotor. So for three-phase you'll need six pole-phase groups.
From reading about making "axial flux alternators" for wind generators I
have a pretty good idea about placing the coils and wiring them for either
Wye or Delta plus I may even have the option of making it six phase instead
of just three. Neon John recently explained to me how to test one coil and
figure what the total output would be at a given RPM. I know what the field
coil voltage normally is for a 12 volt, 3 phase alternator but couldn't find
any such information on a 120 volt, single phase field coil. Maybe it
should be obvious, but it's a mystery to me. Once I learn this it will
probably be obvious.
> daestrom
Posted by Tim Jackson on June 10, 2009, 6:02 pm
Ulysses wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Anyone happen to know if the poles on a single phase alternator field
>>> coil
>>>>> (rotor) are opposite such as they are on a 3-phase alternator? I
>>> applied
>>>>> *some* voltage to it but don't know how much is OK and don't want to
>>> burn
>>>>> it
>>>>> out but it seems, so far, that the poles are the same on both sides
>>> (i.e.
>>>>> N
>>>>> and N and not N on one side and S on the other). Also, would the
> field
>>>>> coil
>>>>> be getting 120 volts on a 120/240 volt generator? I have this idea
> but
>>>>> before I waste my time I need to find out why it won't work ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> There should be one N and one S if it only has two poles. If more than
>>>> that, it should alternate N, S, N, S and so on. The voltage applied to
>>> the
>>>> field winding is seldom anywhere near the same as the output voltage
> and
>>>> it's always DC. (although once in a while the rectifier is mounted
> right
>>> on
>>>> the rotor so you can apply AC to the rotor's slip rings).
>>>>
>>>> Typical car alternator uses DC on the field winding, applied via two
> slip
>>>> rings. Although it is only one coil, the metal pieces on each side
> have
>>>> inter-woven fingers so that alternating 'fingers' are opposite polarity
>>> (N,
>>>> S, N, S as I mentioned above). One alternator has as many as 28
>>>> 'fingers'
>>>> so that's 14 N poles and 14 S poles, interwoven.
>>>>
>>>> Surprisingly, a rotor for a three-phase machine and a single-phase
>>>> machine
>>>> have the same number of poles and winding. The only difference between
>>>> three-phase and single-phase is in the stator (armature) winding, not
> the
>>>> rotor (field) winding.
>>>>
>>>> daestrom
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What I have in mind is to use a field coil from a single-phase
> alternator
>>> to
>>> produce three-phase (or more) power by winding three coils (or six
>>> perhaps)
>>> for a new stator. This particular field coil has a tapered mount so it
>>> would be direct-drive. It has slip rings so I could apply the
> excitation
>>> current directly and control it for the desired output. That all
> depends
>>> upon whether or not the coils are still OK. The generator I saved it
> from
>>> had a melted stator but the field coils appear to be OK but I'm not sure
>>> if
>>> it's one coil wound on two poles or two seperate coils.
>> It may be either. The important question is just how many magnetic poles
> it
>> has. If it has one N and one S, it is a two-pole rotor. Two N's and two
>> S's means four pole and so on. Call this number N. It must be an even
>> number or you've got a consequent pole issue and I really, REALLY doubt
> that
>> for an alternator rotor.
>
> There are two windings (not sure yet if it's two seperate windings or one
> continuous wire) and they are wound around two iron cores. With *some*
> voltage applied to the slip rings I was unable to determine the pole
> directions by holding a permanant magnet up to each core. Not enough
> voltage yet, I guess.
>
>> If you want to wind a three-phase stator, you need 3*N number of coil
> groups
>> (we call them pole-phase groups). Then the next thing to do is then count
>> the slots in your stator (call it S) and hope that it is divisible by 3*N.
>> If it is evenly divisible by 3*N then you are almost ready. You need to
>> figure out how wide to make your coils (the coil pitch).
>>
>> Commercial machines we would put all the coils in with the leads extending
>> out one end. The first few you leave one side of the coils 'up' out of
> the
>> slot until you work your way around the stator. Put one side of each coil
>> in the 'bottom' of a slot and move on. After you've put in one coil pitch
>> worth, you can put one side in the bottom of the next slow and the other
>> side in the 'top' of the first slot you started with, on top of the first
>> coil you laid.
>>
>> After you have them all installed and wedged suitably tight in the slots,
>> you figure out how many coils connect together to form one phase group.
> If
>> you have a nice even stator, it comes out to S/(3*N). So a 72 slot
> stator,
>> for a four pole machine, you have 72/(3*4) = 6 coils that you connect
>> together into one phase group. When you're done with that step you should
>> have 3*N (in my example 12) phase groups.
>>
>> Count off by 3 to see which ones are the same phase. If you imagine the
>> rotor in the middle of the stator and one pole directly over one phase
>> group, the other poles of the rotor will be directly over the other phase
>> groups of the same phase.
>>
>> Connecting the individual phase groups together into each of the phases is
>> not hard, but it's much easier to show with a diagram than to explain in
>> words. But basically you can connect them either in series (more voltage)
>> or parallel (more available current).
>>
>> BUt considering this is a seat-of-the-pants design, you might be best off
> by
>> insulating the leads and assembling it first one time, spin it up and see
>> how much voltage you get from one phase group. Then you can get an idea
>> what it's capable of.
>>
>> If you want more current per coil but don't want to buy wire that is
> double
>> in size, you can use an old trick we used of winding your coils
>> 'two-in-hand'. Simply use two strands of the same size wire and wind both
>> strands at the same time making half as many turns. You'll get half the
>> voltage but by soldering the two strands together at each end you get
> double
>> the cross-section.
>>
>>
>>> Like I said I tried
>>> applying some DC voltage and didn't get any definate answers but I did
> get
>>> quite a zap when I disconnected the DC source so something is still
>>> working.
>> Big coil around iron is a great inductor :-)
>>
>>> All I would need to do is to make a brush holder, mount the non-engine
> end
>>> in a bearing, and one way or another position the stator coils around
> it.
>>> And rectify it, of course. Since there is some residual magnetism in
> the
>>> field coil I think it will self-excite just like my Delco car alternator
>>> does. But I don't know how much DC voltage it will need to excite and
> end
>>> up producing, say, 80 volts at 3600 rpm, but I think that will be
>>> controlled by the number of turns on the stator coils.
>> The first thing you want to figure out is what is the max DC current you
> can
>> push through the rotor. Take a look at the wire size to get an idea.
> Then
>> start out with your trials using only about 25% of what you think the max
>> is. This would be about the 'no-load field amps' operating point.
>
> Yes, I don't want to melt the wires ;-) I tried using a "dead" 12 volt car
> battery that only put out about 9 volts with no load and couldn't tell for
> sure what the poles were. I guess it should be safe to try a good battery.
>
>> As the load is applied to an AC alternator, the DC field current has to be
>> increased quite a bit to keep the voltage constant.
>>
>>> To answer Jim
>>> Wilkins the coil was originally for a single-phase, 120/240 3600 rpm
>>> generator but I would be running it at 3600 maximum and slowing down the
>>> engine to control my output voltage (and adjusting the field current as
>>> needed too). Before I get started I just want to be pretty sure of what
> I
>>> have to work with. It sounds like, from what everyone said, that the
> pole
>>> should be correct for my purposes. :-D
>> Okay, if it originally was 3600 rpm for 60Hz, then it is definitely a
> 2-pole
>> rotor. So for three-phase you'll need six pole-phase groups.
>
> From reading about making "axial flux alternators" for wind generators I
> have a pretty good idea about placing the coils and wiring them for either
> Wye or Delta plus I may even have the option of making it six phase instead
> of just three. Neon John recently explained to me how to test one coil and
> figure what the total output would be at a given RPM. I know what the field
> coil voltage normally is for a 12 volt, 3 phase alternator but couldn't find
> any such information on a 120 volt, single phase field coil. Maybe it
> should be obvious, but it's a mystery to me. Once I learn this it will
> probably be obvious.
>
>
>> daestrom
>>
>
>
The field coil voltage is entirely up to the designer of the alternator.
There is no 'standard' solution for an AC generator as there is no
convenient DC line to feed it from. The simplest design in most cases
is to use the rectified AC output, but it rather depends on the original
application. Measuring the coil's resistance should give you a clue, if
you calculate the voltage (sqrt(Watts*Ohms)) that will dissipate around
5% of the alternator's rated output power, that shouldn't cook it and
should give plenty of field.
Of course we are talking about *maximum* voltage here, in operation the
regulator should back off the field current to maintain the correct
output voltage. Full field current only occurs at high load and low
RPM: in automotive terms, charging a flat battery on idle. At all other
times the field current will be reduced, quite a lot.
Tim Jackson
Posted by Ulysses on June 12, 2009, 10:57 pm
> Ulysses wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Anyone happen to know if the poles on a single phase alternator
field
> >>> coil
> >>>>> (rotor) are opposite such as they are on a 3-phase alternator? I
> >>> applied
> >>>>> *some* voltage to it but don't know how much is OK and don't want to
> >>> burn
> >>>>> it
> >>>>> out but it seems, so far, that the poles are the same on both sides
> >>> (i.e.
> >>>>> N
> >>>>> and N and not N on one side and S on the other). Also, would the
> > field
> >>>>> coil
> >>>>> be getting 120 volts on a 120/240 volt generator? I have this idea
> > but
> >>>>> before I waste my time I need to find out why it won't work ;-)
> >>>>>
> >>>> There should be one N and one S if it only has two poles. If more
than
> >>>> that, it should alternate N, S, N, S and so on. The voltage applied
to
> >>> the
> >>>> field winding is seldom anywhere near the same as the output voltage
> > and
> >>>> it's always DC. (although once in a while the rectifier is mounted
> > right
> >>> on
> >>>> the rotor so you can apply AC to the rotor's slip rings).
> >>>>
> >>>> Typical car alternator uses DC on the field winding, applied via two
> > slip
> >>>> rings. Although it is only one coil, the metal pieces on each side
> > have
> >>>> inter-woven fingers so that alternating 'fingers' are opposite
polarity
> >>> (N,
> >>>> S, N, S as I mentioned above). One alternator has as many as 28
> >>>> 'fingers'
> >>>> so that's 14 N poles and 14 S poles, interwoven.
> >>>>
> >>>> Surprisingly, a rotor for a three-phase machine and a single-phase
> >>>> machine
> >>>> have the same number of poles and winding. The only difference
between
> >>>> three-phase and single-phase is in the stator (armature) winding, not
> > the
> >>>> rotor (field) winding.
> >>>>
> >>>> daestrom
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> What I have in mind is to use a field coil from a single-phase
> > alternator
> >>> to
> >>> produce three-phase (or more) power by winding three coils (or six
> >>> perhaps)
> >>> for a new stator. This particular field coil has a tapered mount so
it
> >>> would be direct-drive. It has slip rings so I could apply the
> > excitation
> >>> current directly and control it for the desired output. That all
> > depends
> >>> upon whether or not the coils are still OK. The generator I saved it
> > from
> >>> had a melted stator but the field coils appear to be OK but I'm not
sure
> >>> if
> >>> it's one coil wound on two poles or two seperate coils.
> >> It may be either. The important question is just how many magnetic
poles
> > it
> >> has. If it has one N and one S, it is a two-pole rotor. Two N's and
two
> >> S's means four pole and so on. Call this number N. It must be an even
> >> number or you've got a consequent pole issue and I really, REALLY doubt
> > that
> >> for an alternator rotor.
> >
> > There are two windings (not sure yet if it's two seperate windings or
one
> > continuous wire) and they are wound around two iron cores. With *some*
> > voltage applied to the slip rings I was unable to determine the pole
> > directions by holding a permanant magnet up to each core. Not enough
> > voltage yet, I guess.
> >
> >> If you want to wind a three-phase stator, you need 3*N number of coil
> > groups
> >> (we call them pole-phase groups). Then the next thing to do is then
count
> >> the slots in your stator (call it S) and hope that it is divisible by
3*N.
> >> If it is evenly divisible by 3*N then you are almost ready. You need
to
> >> figure out how wide to make your coils (the coil pitch).
> >>
> >> Commercial machines we would put all the coils in with the leads
extending
> >> out one end. The first few you leave one side of the coils 'up' out of
> > the
> >> slot until you work your way around the stator. Put one side of each
coil
> >> in the 'bottom' of a slot and move on. After you've put in one coil
pitch
> >> worth, you can put one side in the bottom of the next slow and the
other
> >> side in the 'top' of the first slot you started with, on top of the
first
> >> coil you laid.
> >>
> >> After you have them all installed and wedged suitably tight in the
slots,
> >> you figure out how many coils connect together to form one phase group.
> > If
> >> you have a nice even stator, it comes out to S/(3*N). So a 72 slot
> > stator,
> >> for a four pole machine, you have 72/(3*4) = 6 coils that you connect
> >> together into one phase group. When you're done with that step you
should
> >> have 3*N (in my example 12) phase groups.
> >>
> >> Count off by 3 to see which ones are the same phase. If you imagine
the
> >> rotor in the middle of the stator and one pole directly over one phase
> >> group, the other poles of the rotor will be directly over the other
phase
> >> groups of the same phase.
> >>
> >> Connecting the individual phase groups together into each of the phases
is
> >> not hard, but it's much easier to show with a diagram than to explain
in
> >> words. But basically you can connect them either in series (more
voltage)
> >> or parallel (more available current).
> >>
> >> BUt considering this is a seat-of-the-pants design, you might be best
off
> > by
> >> insulating the leads and assembling it first one time, spin it up and
see
> >> how much voltage you get from one phase group. Then you can get an
idea
> >> what it's capable of.
> >>
> >> If you want more current per coil but don't want to buy wire that is
> > double
> >> in size, you can use an old trick we used of winding your coils
> >> 'two-in-hand'. Simply use two strands of the same size wire and wind
both
> >> strands at the same time making half as many turns. You'll get half
the
> >> voltage but by soldering the two strands together at each end you get
> > double
> >> the cross-section.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Like I said I tried
> >>> applying some DC voltage and didn't get any definate answers but I did
> > get
> >>> quite a zap when I disconnected the DC source so something is still
> >>> working.
> >> Big coil around iron is a great inductor :-)
> >>
> >>> All I would need to do is to make a brush holder, mount the non-engine
> > end
> >>> in a bearing, and one way or another position the stator coils around
> > it.
> >>> And rectify it, of course. Since there is some residual magnetism in
> > the
> >>> field coil I think it will self-excite just like my Delco car
alternator
> >>> does. But I don't know how much DC voltage it will need to excite and
> > end
> >>> up producing, say, 80 volts at 3600 rpm, but I think that will be
> >>> controlled by the number of turns on the stator coils.
> >> The first thing you want to figure out is what is the max DC current
you
> > can
> >> push through the rotor. Take a look at the wire size to get an idea.
> > Then
> >> start out with your trials using only about 25% of what you think the
max
> >> is. This would be about the 'no-load field amps' operating point.
> >
> > Yes, I don't want to melt the wires ;-) I tried using a "dead" 12 volt
car
> > battery that only put out about 9 volts with no load and couldn't tell
for
> > sure what the poles were. I guess it should be safe to try a good
battery.
> >
> >> As the load is applied to an AC alternator, the DC field current has to
be
> >> increased quite a bit to keep the voltage constant.
> >>
> >>> To answer Jim
> >>> Wilkins the coil was originally for a single-phase, 120/240 3600 rpm
> >>> generator but I would be running it at 3600 maximum and slowing down
the
> >>> engine to control my output voltage (and adjusting the field current
as
> >>> needed too). Before I get started I just want to be pretty sure of
what
> > I
> >>> have to work with. It sounds like, from what everyone said, that the
> > pole
> >>> should be correct for my purposes. :-D
> >> Okay, if it originally was 3600 rpm for 60Hz, then it is definitely a
> > 2-pole
> >> rotor. So for three-phase you'll need six pole-phase groups.
> >
> > From reading about making "axial flux alternators" for wind generators I
> > have a pretty good idea about placing the coils and wiring them for
either
> > Wye or Delta plus I may even have the option of making it six phase
instead
> > of just three. Neon John recently explained to me how to test one coil
and
> > figure what the total output would be at a given RPM. I know what the
field
> > coil voltage normally is for a 12 volt, 3 phase alternator but couldn't
find
> > any such information on a 120 volt, single phase field coil. Maybe it
> > should be obvious, but it's a mystery to me. Once I learn this it will
> > probably be obvious.
> >
> >
> >> daestrom
> >>
> >
> >
> The field coil voltage is entirely up to the designer of the alternator.
> There is no 'standard' solution for an AC generator as there is no
> convenient DC line to feed it from. The simplest design in most cases
> is to use the rectified AC output, but it rather depends on the original
> application. Measuring the coil's resistance should give you a clue, if
> you calculate the voltage (sqrt(Watts*Ohms)) that will dissipate around
> 5% of the alternator's rated output power, that shouldn't cook it and
> should give plenty of field.
By "watts" do you mean the rated output of the alternator?
> Of course we are talking about *maximum* voltage here, in operation the
> regulator should back off the field current to maintain the correct
> output voltage. Full field current only occurs at high load and low
> RPM: in automotive terms, charging a flat battery on idle. At all other
> times the field current will be reduced, quite a lot.
> Tim Jackson
> >>
> >>
> >> > Anyone happen to know if the poles on a single phase alternator field
> > coil
> >> > (rotor) are opposite such as they are on a 3-phase alternator? I
> > applied
> >> > *some* voltage to it but don't know how much is OK and don't want to
> > burn
> >> > it
> >> > out but it seems, so far, that the poles are the same on both sides
> > (i.e.
> >> > N
> >> > and N and not N on one side and S on the other). Also, would the
> >> > field
> >> > coil
> >> > be getting 120 volts on a 120/240 volt generator? I have this idea
> >> > but
> >> > before I waste my time I need to find out why it won't work ;-)
> >> >
> >>
> >> There should be one N and one S if it only has two poles. If more than
> >> that, it should alternate N, S, N, S and so on. The voltage applied to
> > the
> >> field winding is seldom anywhere near the same as the output voltage
and
> >> it's always DC. (although once in a while the rectifier is mounted
> >> right
> > on
> >> the rotor so you can apply AC to the rotor's slip rings).
> >>
> >> Typical car alternator uses DC on the field winding, applied via two
> >> slip
> >> rings. Although it is only one coil, the metal pieces on each side
have
> >> inter-woven fingers so that alternating 'fingers' are opposite polarity
> > (N,
> >> S, N, S as I mentioned above). One alternator has as many as 28
> >> 'fingers'
> >> so that's 14 N poles and 14 S poles, interwoven.
> >>
> >> Surprisingly, a rotor for a three-phase machine and a single-phase
> >> machine
> >> have the same number of poles and winding. The only difference between
> >> three-phase and single-phase is in the stator (armature) winding, not
> >> the
> >> rotor (field) winding.
> >>
> >> daestrom
> >>
> >>
> >
> > What I have in mind is to use a field coil from a single-phase