Posted by Bill Ward on April 14, 2011, 2:48 pm
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:51:07 +0200, Melodie de l'Epine wrote:
When you can show conclusively that it is, get back to us. Until then,
you simply appear to be attempting to shift wealth toward those you
The way to protect the environment is to legally prohibit emitting
substances that can be proven harmful. CO2 is not one of those
Do you know who Lloyd Parker is? You seem to have taken hysteria classes
Posted by Bill Ward on April 14, 2011, 5:34 pm
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:41:59 -0700, Bob F wrote:
I said "proven harmful". That has nothing to do with agreement or
disagreement. If you'd like, you can show and explain the evidence that
you think proves CO2 is harmful to the Earth, but otherwise, you're just
a sheep in sheep's clothing.
Are you sure you're not Lloyd? Maybe you just went to the same school,
but you sure sound like him.
Posted by Giga2 on April 14, 2011, 8:24 am
It is really strange these people who advocate no or very mininmal
government and yet do not move to Somalia or parts Mindanao, Afghanistan,
Burmese forests etc.
Posted by Bill Ward on April 14, 2011, 2:06 pm
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:24:04 +0100, Giga2" <"Giga2 wrote:
You appear to be confusing freedom and anarchy. National defense and an
objective legal system are legitimate, primary, functions of government.
Our US Constitution enumerates a few others which are also useful.
Getting something for nothing is not a basic human right, as it leads to
slavery for the actual providers.
Posted by Giga2 on April 15, 2011, 4:20 pm
Funny, that is what you seem to be doing to *me*!
So no welfare, education or health programmes?