wrote:
> On Monday, January 21, 2013 11:55:42 PM UTC-6, harry k wrote:
> > > On 1/20/2013 11:14 AM, Energy-Ingenuity wrote:> "Verifiable Science?
> > > No. We've been over this same ground over and over. Actually this
> > > crap is neither "verifiable" nor "science".
> > It isn't even good crap.
> > But then it has been a long dry spell since the magnet monkey showed
> > up.
> > Harrry
> I did not know that people were on this group that was this stuppid. If you read
the US patent, in the first sentance, "outputs both mechanical and
electriacal
energy", what do you think the in put is? Don't insult me anymore!
You are too stupid to even know when you are being insulted. Your
input is "energy" no matter how you try to hide it.
Harry K
XML site map
> > > On 1/20/2013 11:14 AM, Energy-Ingenuity wrote:> "Verifiable Science?
> > > No. We've been over this same ground over and over. Actually this
> > > crap is neither "verifiable" nor "science".
> > It isn't even good crap.
> > But then it has been a long dry spell since the magnet monkey showed
> > up.
> > Harrry
> I did not know that people were on this group that was this stuppid. If you read