Posted by m II on February 4, 2011, 2:18 am
>"Michael B" wrote in message
> m II wrote:
> > On 11-01-30 03:21 PM, Curbie wrote:
> >> Are you so diluted that you think by spinning a new fairy-tail people
> >> will forget the details of the last fairy-tail you spun.
> > Not to be a pedantic prick, but that's 'fairy TALES'. A spinning fairy
> > TAIL is a topic best left for the deviant groups....
> > mike
> I don't hold anything against anyone's spelling or grammar...we all know
> what he is talking about.
> Jim Rojas
>Yep, that's why "diluted" instead of "deluded" got by.
...and "fairy-tales" instead of "faery-tales"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy
Either way we all knew what Curbie meant and it is "whoppers" told by our
Jim (roll-it) Rojas.
Posted by Jim Rojas on February 4, 2011, 2:37 am
m II wrote:
>> "Michael B" wrote in message
>> m II wrote:
>> > On 11-01-30 03:21 PM, Curbie wrote:
>>
>> >> Are you so diluted that you think by spinning a new fairy-tail people
>> >> will forget the details of the last fairy-tail you spun.
>>
>> > Not to be a pedantic prick, but that's 'fairy TALES'. A spinning fairy
>> > TAIL is a topic best left for the deviant groups....
>>
>> > mike
>>
>> I don't hold anything against anyone's spelling or grammar...we all know
>> what he is talking about.
>>
>> Jim Rojas
>> Yep, that's why "diluted" instead of "deluded" got by.
> ...and "fairy-tales" instead of "faery-tales"
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy
> Either way we all knew what Curbie meant and it is "whoppers" told by
> our Jim (roll-it) Rojas.
More posts from the anonymous peanut gallery. I did notice how one
minute it is Curbie, followed by Josepi, then m II, etc, and so on. One
can only assume its all the same troll. Try responding as a single
person. Your timely comebacks and poor arguments might be more credible
that way.
Jim Rojas
Technical Manuals Online!
http://www.tech-man.com
8002 Cornwall Lane
Tampa, FL 33615-4604
813-884-6335
Posted by Josepi on February 4, 2011, 2:52 am
Let's see if this profits your exposure
http://www.google.ca/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=Jim+Rojas+ripoff&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=#sclient=psy&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&source=hp&q=Jim+Rojas+fraud&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&fp=bbcbdadbd11f3497
You may have to patch the pieces together
More posts from the anonymous peanut gallery. I did notice how one
minute it is Curbie, followed by Josepi, then m II, etc, and so on. One
can only assume its all the same troll. Try responding as a single
person. Your timely comebacks and poor arguments might be more credible
that way.
Jim Rojas
Technical Manuals Online!
http://www.tech-man.com
8002 Cornwall Lane
Tampa, FL 33615-4604
813-884-6335
Posted by Jim Rojas on February 4, 2011, 3:22 am
Josepi wrote:
> Let's see if this profits your exposure
>
http://www.google.ca/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&q=Jim+Rojas+ripoff&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=#sclient=psy&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENCA273&source=hp&q=Jim+Rojas+fraud&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&fp=bbcbdadbd11f3497
> You may have to patch the pieces together
> More posts from the anonymous peanut gallery. I did notice how one
> minute it is Curbie, followed by Josepi, then m II, etc, and so on. One
> can only assume its all the same troll. Try responding as a single
> person. Your timely comebacks and poor arguments might be more credible
> that way.
> Jim Rojas
> Technical Manuals Online!
> http://www.tech-man.com
> 8002 Cornwall Lane
> Tampa, FL 33615-4604
> 813-884-6335
If you feel you have to attack me...have at it. I have been attacked by
those with very deep pockets. It's too bad they are no longer around...
I don't hold a grudge Josepi. Anytime you want to end this is fine by
me. The choice is yours.
Jim Rojas
Technical Manuals Online!
http://www.tech-man.com
8002 Cornwall Lane
Tampa, FL 33615-4604
813-884-6335
Posted by m II on February 5, 2011, 6:44 am
On 11-02-03 07:37 PM, Jim Rojas wrote:
> m II wrote:
>>> "Michael B" wrote in message
>>>
>>
>>> m II wrote:
>>> > On 11-01-30 03:21 PM, Curbie wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Are you so diluted that you think by spinning a new fairy-tail people
>>> >> will forget the details of the last fairy-tail you spun.
>>>
>>> > Not to be a pedantic prick, but that's 'fairy TALES'. A spinning fairy
>>> > TAIL is a topic best left for the deviant groups....
>>>
>>> > mike
>>>
>>> I don't hold anything against anyone's spelling or grammar...we all know
>>> what he is talking about.
>>>
>>> Jim Rojas
>>
>>> Yep, that's why "diluted" instead of "deluded" got by.
>>
>>
>> ...and "fairy-tales" instead of "faery-tales"
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairy
>>
>> Either way we all knew what Curbie meant and it is "whoppers" told by
>> our Jim (roll-it) Rojas.
>>
>>
> More posts from the anonymous peanut gallery. I did notice how one
> minute it is Curbie, followed by Josepi, then m II, etc, and so on. One
> can only assume its all the same troll. Try responding as a single
> person. Your timely comebacks and poor arguments might be more credible
> that way.
it's Josepi the moron at it again. he has a bunch of aliases. He's a
fruitcake from Ontario, Canada and knows everything about everything.
At one time he claimed was a transformer design engineer for twenty
years. On another occasion, he claimed he worked for a utility company,
examining work done by others. Before that, he was an expert in child
medication. He was drugging his three kids up daily on his own, as the
doctors were incompetent. Just before that, he was busy stealing
knitting machine patterns in a binary newsgroup.
He has had to change Internet provides a few times now, due to
complaints arising out his posting forgeries.
Don't waste your time with him. I'd venture to say he's a bigger fraud
than you are.
mike
XML site map
> m II wrote:
> > On 11-01-30 03:21 PM, Curbie wrote:
> >> Are you so diluted that you think by spinning a new fairy-tail people
> >> will forget the details of the last fairy-tail you spun.
> > Not to be a pedantic prick, but that's 'fairy TALES'. A spinning fairy
> > TAIL is a topic best left for the deviant groups....
> > mike
> I don't hold anything against anyone's spelling or grammar...we all know
> what he is talking about.
> Jim Rojas
>Yep, that's why "diluted" instead of "deluded" got by.