Hybrid Car – More Fun with Less Gas

Why do I believe in the E-Cat? - Page 2

register ::  Login Password  :: Lost Password?
Posted by Morris Dovey on January 21, 2012, 8:00 pm
 
On 1/21/12 1:13 PM, amdx wrote:

<snip hard work and long hours needed for small business operation>


Rossi said he used most common isotope of filamentary nickel - this is
extremely fine powder in a form where each grain has a high surface
area. You can buy it on eBay ~$0/pound. Google images has microscope
pictures.


In the original experimentation and in the more recent demonstrations
plain old H2 gas was fed from the tank through a regulator and hose to a
reaction chamber containing only nickel.


You can see photos of his heating setup in most of the reports. It's
pretty straight-forward.


The RF stimulation is a recent addition to the story. Since it wasn't
needed to produce any of the reported early results, I'm assuming that
it isn't necessary to the reaction.


Yes why? It's hard to imagine that /everyone/ is trying to ake a hard
problem out of an easy one...


I'm not a conspiracist, but I'll guess that they feel about as
threatened by LENR development as Kodak did by digital cameras back in
the 70's and 80's. :-)

--
Morris Dovey
http://www.iedu.com/Solar/
http://www.facebook.com/MorrisDovey

Posted by amdx on January 21, 2012, 8:58 pm
 
On 1/21/2012 2:00 PM, Morris Dovey wrote:

  Kodak, wow, even into the 90's and 2000's they had a chance to take a
new business tack but, I didn't hear about the effort.
                         Mikek

Posted by Mho on January 23, 2012, 11:31 pm
 You may be able to afford one from your hit count spam money, soon, too!

----------

                    Thanks, Mikek




Posted by amdx on January 24, 2012, 1:30 pm
 On 1/23/2012 5:31 PM, Mho wrote:

    Every little bit is added to the investment portfolio, but I'm
way past needing more to afford one.
   I'm sorry about your situation.
                        Mikek


Posted by sno on January 24, 2012, 3:20 pm
 On 1/21/2012 11:43 AM, amdx wrote:

One of the main reasons I think this may not be a con is that I cannot
see any way that he has made any money by selling to investors or anyone
else....it appears he has done everything with his own money...and is
accepting no money from anyone else....

His whole plan seems to be to get a device into production....and make
all his money from selling them at the least expensive cost he
can....making all his money from volume sold...

A number of people feel it is a scam because he has not released details
of how it is built.....this makes sense to me since he is not a
scientist....is an engineer/inventor.....and wants to make the maximum
amount of money possible before he has competition....

An impossible claim requires the maximum proof possible....is there any
higher proof that a device works then selling thousands of the device
and people being satisfied that it works...???

I originally thought that there was probably 70/80 percent chance it was
not a scam.....now am up over 90 percent sure he has a working device....

thank you for listening to my thoughts.....have fun.....sno


--
Correct Scientific Terminology:
Hypothesis - a guess as to why or how something occurs
Theory - a hypothesis that has been checked by enough experiments
  to be generally assumed to be true.
Law - a hypothesis that has been checked by enough experiments
  in enough different ways that it is assumed to be truer then a theory.
Note: nothing is proven in science, things are assumed to be true.


This Thread
Bookmark this thread:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
please rate this thread