Posted by harry on September 12, 2009, 5:54 pm
> harry wrote:
> > Also there is big debate here (UK) on forcing the power companies to
> > pay a premium rate for "green electricity" they bought in. So I don't
> > know how much I'd get. (Peanuts at the moment.)
> I have heard that the talk is of setting it at 36p per kWh. At that
> level and at the rate PV prices are dropping it will not be long before
> it becomes a money saving investment to buy PV, even without a grant.
> --http://www.copcutt.me.uk/
I hear about these cheaper PV panels but I've never seen any for sale.
They all seem to cost an arm and a leg here in the UK.
Posted by user on September 12, 2009, 6:10 pm
harry wrote:
>> harry wrote:
>>> Also there is big debate here (UK) on forcing the power companies to
>>> pay a premium rate for "green electricity" they bought in. So I don't
>>> know how much I'd get. (Peanuts at the moment.)
>> I have heard that the talk is of setting it at 36p per kWh. At that
>> level and at the rate PV prices are dropping it will not be long before
>> it becomes a money saving investment to buy PV, even without a grant.
>>
>> --http://www.copcutt.me.uk/
>
> I hear about these cheaper PV panels but I've never seen any for sale.
> They all seem to cost an arm and a leg here in the UK.
You can get them in the USA for as little as $.98 us per watt
http://sunelec.com/
Posted by harry on September 12, 2009, 6:17 pm
> harry wrote:
> > Also there is big debate here (UK) on forcing the power companies to
> > pay a premium rate for "green electricity" they bought in. So I don't
> > know how much I'd get. (Peanuts at the moment.)
> I have heard that the talk is of setting it at 36p per kWh. At that
> level and at the rate PV prices are dropping it will not be long before
> it becomes a money saving investment to buy PV, even without a grant.
> --http://www.copcutt.me.uk/
Read your enegy website with interest.
You have, with most of the rest of them, missed the main point.
That is population control.
All your technological solutions are a complete waste of time without
it.
If we don't control population, nature/economics will do the job for
us, quite soon I believe, in an icredibly nasty and violent way.
Posted by YouDontOwnMe on September 13, 2009, 5:07 am
harry wrote:
>> harry wrote:
>>> Also there is big debate here (UK) on forcing the power companies to
>>> pay a premium rate for "green electricity" they bought in. So I don't
>>> know how much I'd get. (Peanuts at the moment.)
>> I have heard that the talk is of setting it at 36p per kWh. At that
>> level and at the rate PV prices are dropping it will not be long before
>> it becomes a money saving investment to buy PV, even without a grant.
>>
>> --http://www.copcutt.me.uk/
>
> Read your enegy website with interest.
> You have, with most of the rest of them, missed the main point.
> That is population control.
> All your technological solutions are a complete waste of time without
> it.
> If we don't control population, nature/economics will do the job for
> us, quite soon I believe, in an icredibly nasty and violent way.
Just so's you know, Mr. Harry, We don't disagree on everything.
Posted by Scott on September 22, 2009, 12:05 am
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:42:21 -0700 (PDT), in alt.energy.homepower, harry
>Given a few centuries, the way we are heading, we are more likely to
>be extinct or living in caves, than colonising Mars.
The vast majority of people are satisfied to keep doing what they're doing
forever. Fortunately not *everyone* is stuck looking at his own feet or
over his shoulder; there are a precious gifted few who look ahead to find
new paths.
> > Also there is big debate here (UK) on forcing the power companies to
> > pay a premium rate for "green electricity" they bought in. So I don't
> > know how much I'd get. (Peanuts at the moment.)
> I have heard that the talk is of setting it at 36p per kWh. At that
> level and at the rate PV prices are dropping it will not be long before
> it becomes a money saving investment to buy PV, even without a grant.
> --http://www.copcutt.me.uk/