Please Register and login to reply and use other advanced options
Posted by Jim Rojas on November 18, 2010, 6:58 pm
z wrote:
>> On 10-11-18 12:01 AM, Curbie wrote: >>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:12:56 -0800 (PST), Michael B >>> >>>> A different source was presented, and it did a much better >>>> job of presentation. The observation was made at the site >>>> that wattages may be confounded by the meters not >>>> seeing a true sine wave, but look at the current readings. >>>> They suggest an over-unity output, assuming that the >>>> metering is legit. Check the most recent Rojas post. >>>> I'm not ready to believe in Santa Claus, but I do expect >>>> that one of these days someone is going to be able to >>>> use the magnets for something other than the usual >>>> stuff. It might be this one, but not being able to couple >>>> it back to itself suggests that it isn't the Holy Grail of >>>> over-unity. >>> >>> Michael, >>> >>> In general, I agree with your assessment of that video and given the >>> fact that successful over-unity devices are physically impossible in >>> terms of our current understanding of the laws of physics, I think it >>> requires extraordinary proof to advocate over-unity claims. >>> >>> So, as long as no one is advocating over-unity without extraordinary >>> proof or asking for money in some form or another (in either case, >>> trying to scam someone), I don't see the harm in discussing this, as >>> long as people know how ugly z's hydro thread is bound to get if this >>> turns to avocation or solicitation of a over-unity device without >>> extraordinary proof. >>> >>> Most discoveries have been made while looking for something other than >>> what was discovered, so sometimes making a journey brings you to a >>> successful destination other than the one you set out for, and as long >>> as people know that over-unity breaks current laws of physics, it >>> seems any other successful destination is the best that can hoped for >>> here. >>> >>> Curbie >>> >> >> >> Well said. Even with your best of intentions, however, I suspect some >> low life will critisise you. Keep up the sanity. >> >> Presently I am discovering just how much fuel I have to burn to make up >> for the overcast skies in Southern Alberta. No sun for the last three >> days. I even fired up the catalytic kerosene heater to take a load off >> the furnace motor. > Mike I feel your pain. Went through that in late fall when there was no > rain and no sun .. the black hole of energy production. > Right on Curb -- To be honest I didn't grock what that guy was talking > about to start with. I thought he had some kind of fly wheel/magnet > thing setup to his hydro system that stored energy or something like > that. I"m not an engineer .. just a practical user of this stuff. > Didn't understand he was trying to make power out of spinning them with > other batteries. Be very cool if it worked but it's sounding more and > more 'outthere'. Haven't watched the videos on my dialup yet > take care > -zachary >> >> >> >> mike >> >> >> >> mike >>
This is how my 5-10HP motors work.
All it takes is adding Neomags on the armature. It depends on how many
poles your motor has. 4 poles uses 2 rows of 8 N42-N52 magnets.
Forget making stators, and all that trial and error stuff. This
technology has been used for the past 30 years, mostly in 3rd world
countries.
Jim Rojas
--
Jim Rojas
Technical Manuals Online!
http://www.tech-man.com
8002 Cornwall Lane
Tampa, FL 33615-4604
813-884-6335
Posted by z on November 19, 2010, 7:21 pm
@newsfe21.iad:
> > This is how my 5-10HP motors work. > > > > All it takes is adding Neomags on the armature. It depends on how many > poles your motor has. 4 poles uses 2 rows of 8 N42-N52 magnets.
I'm going into town to help fix my buddies hughesnet system.. i'll try to
remember to use your videos to test with. Dialup just ain't cutting it
cheers
-z
Posted by Jim Rojas on November 15, 2010, 1:49 pm
Jim Wilkins wrote:
>> ... >> 1-5HP, 1-3 phase, Industrial AC motors are as good as you can get. They >> can easily be converted into high output, low RPM power generators. They >> are designed to be continuous duty. You have to bascially open them up, >> and place 2 sets of N42-N52 Neomags on the armature. If your motor has 4 >> poles, you must add 2 rows of 8 magnets. >> ... >> Jim Rojas > How do you attach the magnets and rebalance the armature? > jsw
Posted by Jim Wilkins on November 15, 2010, 7:39 pm
> Jim Wilkins wrote: > ...> > > How do you attach the magnets and rebalance the armature? > > jsw > This video takes you step by step. > http://www.youtube.com/profile?annotation_id=annotation_932309&user=M ... > Jim Rojas
Not with dialup. Hints?
Magnets are too hard and brittle to machine and I'm not about to grind
heavy metals to dust in my house.
jsw
Posted by vaughn on November 15, 2010, 7:54 pm
>Magnets are too hard and brittle to machine and I'm not about to grind >heavy metals to dust in my house.
Even light metals can be amazingly dangerous to the human lung. Especially
beryllium.
XML site map
>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:12:56 -0800 (PST), Michael B
>>>
>>>> A different source was presented, and it did a much better
>>>> job of presentation. The observation was made at the site
>>>> that wattages may be confounded by the meters not
>>>> seeing a true sine wave, but look at the current readings.
>>>> They suggest an over-unity output, assuming that the
>>>> metering is legit. Check the most recent Rojas post.
>>>> I'm not ready to believe in Santa Claus, but I do expect
>>>> that one of these days someone is going to be able to
>>>> use the magnets for something other than the usual
>>>> stuff. It might be this one, but not being able to couple
>>>> it back to itself suggests that it isn't the Holy Grail of
>>>> over-unity.
>>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>> In general, I agree with your assessment of that video and given the
>>> fact that successful over-unity devices are physically impossible in
>>> terms of our current understanding of the laws of physics, I think it
>>> requires extraordinary proof to advocate over-unity claims.
>>>
>>> So, as long as no one is advocating over-unity without extraordinary
>>> proof or asking for money in some form or another (in either case,
>>> trying to scam someone), I don't see the harm in discussing this, as
>>> long as people know how ugly z's hydro thread is bound to get if this
>>> turns to avocation or solicitation of a over-unity device without
>>> extraordinary proof.
>>>
>>> Most discoveries have been made while looking for something other than
>>> what was discovered, so sometimes making a journey brings you to a
>>> successful destination other than the one you set out for, and as long
>>> as people know that over-unity breaks current laws of physics, it
>>> seems any other successful destination is the best that can hoped for
>>> here.
>>>
>>> Curbie
>>>
>>
>>
>> Well said. Even with your best of intentions, however, I suspect some
>> low life will critisise you. Keep up the sanity.
>>
>> Presently I am discovering just how much fuel I have to burn to make up
>> for the overcast skies in Southern Alberta. No sun for the last three
>> days. I even fired up the catalytic kerosene heater to take a load off
>> the furnace motor.
> Mike I feel your pain. Went through that in late fall when there was no
> rain and no sun .. the black hole of energy production.
> Right on Curb -- To be honest I didn't grock what that guy was talking
> about to start with. I thought he had some kind of fly wheel/magnet
> thing setup to his hydro system that stored energy or something like
> that. I"m not an engineer .. just a practical user of this stuff.
> Didn't understand he was trying to make power out of spinning them with
> other batteries. Be very cool if it worked but it's sounding more and
> more 'outthere'. Haven't watched the videos on my dialup yet
> take care
> -zachary
>>
>>
>>
>> mike
>>
>>
>>
>> mike
>>