another 110 mpg magic engine? For real maybe - Page 3

 

For the long link impared:
http://tinyurl.com/lnwqx6

 

z wrote:


There must have been something wrong with your original link or the
server wasn't responding.



Mustangs don't do 110 mpg. THIS IS A FRAUD. Shame the USA doesn't have
hard consumer legislation to prevent LIES being told.

Graham


--
due to the hugely increased level of spam please make the obvious
adjustment to my email address

 Eeyore wrote:

(...)


We have laws to prevent the truth from being told.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gag_order
http://www.angiehicksblog.com/Search.aspx?searchtext=medical+%22gag+order%22&searchmode=AllWords

That's good enough, right?

--Winston

--

"In an age of bodily repose, with nearly all locomotion artificial,
with money as the principal purveyor, it is not surprising that men are
careless about their physical powers, and think them hardly worth the
trouble which their full cultivation would entail."

Popular Science
_On the Artificial Production of Stupidity in Schools_
June, 1872

 The Auto X-Prize run is starting in September.
Time for them to put up or shut up.
I can wait.

wrote:

 

Somewhere along the line it got broke off into two lines.  You have to
cut/paste the 'AID..." line right after the 'article?' part of the first
line.  Worked for me just fine the other day when I first read this thread.
That's what he meant by posting the tinyurl 'for the long link impaired'
that couldn't figure out how to splice the two lines together.


Reading comprehension a bit low?  The article says his Mustang got 39 mpg,
not 110.  Go read it again, a bit slower this time.

daestrom