Posted by Ashton Crusher on February 24, 2010, 7:58 am
wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:41:29 -0800, jim beam wrote:
>> On 02/23/2010 09:25 PM, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:43:42 -0800, jim beam wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02/23/2010 08:33 PM, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:59:48 -0600, Bob Cooper wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article<0ae546ee-0551-4461-b091-
>>>>>> 8c5a097a99ef@b7g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, Mark_Ransley@Yahoo.com
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A woman testified before Congress that when her Toyota began
>>>>>>>> accelerating uncontrollably she "put the car in neutral and it had
>>>>>>>> no effect, I stepped on the brakes and it had no effect, I applied
>>>>>>>> the emergency brake and it had no effect, I even tried to put the
>>>>>>>> car into reverse and I couldn't."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Huh? Putting the car in neutral had no effect? Someone provide with
>>>>>>>> with a clue on this one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW< the car was a Lexus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now the bull starts, and you are the one starting it. Did you know
>>>>>>> 70% of Toyotas complaints for self acceleration don`t even cover the
>>>>>>> recalled cars, that is from Toyotas own internal documents. And of
>>>>>>> course you were with the lady when her occurance happened, so you
>>>>>>> Know its bull for a fact.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh, you must be mistaken.
>>>>>> This fellow knows quite a bit about cars. And his auto insights have
>>>>>> shown the Toyota problem is really GM's fault, along with Toyota
>>>>>> owners who have lied before Congress. I would go so far as to say he
>>>>>> is the world's foremost expert. And he has been kind enough to bring
>>>>>> his Toyota insights to the tech group to educate all of us who do
>>>>>> mechanical work on cars. I can't tell tell you how much we appreciate
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't mention it. Any time you need any help, you just ask me. I'd be
>>>>> glad to help you out. You do know what a car is, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Here, one more time for you:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A woman testified before Congress that when her Toyota began
>>>>>>>> accelerating uncontrollably she "put the car in neutral and it had
>>>>>>>> no effect, I stepped on the brakes and it had no effect, I applied
>>>>>>>> the emergency brake and it had no effect, I even tried to put the
>>>>>>>> car into reverse and I couldn't."
>>>>
>>>> all under oath...
>>>>
>>>> i've been to hearings like this and seen people perjure themselves with
>>>> very little provocation or pay. it's not uncommon.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure she perjured herself, but I'd bet she should NOT be behind
>>> the wheel of a car. ANY car.
>>>
>>> If you can't handle a situation like that, you shouldn't be driving. As
>>> I said, she probably had it in "Sport" and didn't bring it back through
>>> the gate into Neutral. That's the only way the car wouldn't stop in
>>> neutral.
>>>
>>> And she must have gotten it stopped SOMEHOW, since she was there to tell
>>> the tale.
>>
>> oh, she's perjuring herself. i've seen this stuff many times - there's a
>> certain theatrical circus show to these things - and a cadre of
>> individuals that will show up and say the most blatantly untrue bullshit
>> in terms that make the average vaudevillian look like an amateur.
>>
>> one case i saw, some dude showed up in a medial gown, with i.v. drips
>> taped to his arm testifying about some doctor saving his life. thing was,
>> this individual was shown not to be a patient of that doctor, nor could he
>> have been at the facility concerned. it was just theater designed for
>> show and to help sway a decision. i guess there's out-of-work actors that
>> need money /real/ bad.
>Like the time Mike J Fox didn't take his medication for two or three days
>so his Parkinson's would be more pronounced.
Ah, so you are a dittohead. Explains a lot.
Posted by Hachiroku on February 24, 2010, 5:33 pm
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:58:29 -0700, Ashton Crusher wrote:
>>Like the time Mike J Fox didn't take his medication for two or three
>>days so his Parkinson's would be more pronounced.
>>
>>
>>
> Ah, so you are a dittohead. Explains a lot.
Why I don't believe you could ruin a transmission by mewrely full
throttle shifting?
I'm sure you're not telling us something. like the lady who just couldn't
stop her Lexus, no matter what. Riiight.
And what does being a DH have to do with it? I saw Fox on CNN (there's an
oxymoron...) before Limbaugh even mentioned it, and I did NOT agree with
Limbaugh on it. I have relatives with Parkinson's.
so there.
Posted by ben91932 on February 24, 2010, 3:05 am
> Did you know 70%
> of Toyotas complaints for self acceleration don`t even cover the
> recalled cars, that is from Toyotas own internal documents.
I wound *never* trust a claim like this from *any* corporation. Fox,
henhouse etc
Ben
Posted by =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$ on February 24, 2010, 4:32 am
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:44:35 -0800, ransley wrote:
>> A woman testified before Congress that when her Toyota began
>> accelerating uncontrollably she "put the car in neutral and it had no
>> effect, I stepped on the brakes and it had no effect, I applied the
>> emergency brake and it had no effect, I even tried to put the car into
>> reverse and I couldn't."
>>
>> Huh? Putting the car in neutral had no effect? Someone provide with with
>> a clue on this one.
>>
>> BTW< the car was a Lexus.
>
> Now the bull starts, and you are the one starting it. Did you know 70% of
> Toyotas complaints for self acceleration don`t even cover the recalled
> cars, that is from Toyotas own internal documents. And of course you were
> with the lady when her occurance happened, so you Know its bull for a
> fact.
Gee, ransley...putting it in neutral didn't stop it...using the brakes
didn't stop it...using the e-brake didn't stop it?
Either she's full of shit, or (more likely) should probably be riding the
bus.
Or both.
Posted by jim beam on February 24, 2010, 4:44 am
On 02/23/2010 08:32 PM, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:44:35 -0800, ransley wrote:
>>> A woman testified before Congress that when her Toyota began
>>> accelerating uncontrollably she "put the car in neutral and it had no
>>> effect, I stepped on the brakes and it had no effect, I applied the
>>> emergency brake and it had no effect, I even tried to put the car into
>>> reverse and I couldn't."
>>>
>>> Huh? Putting the car in neutral had no effect? Someone provide with with
>>> a clue on this one.
>>>
>>> BTW< the car was a Lexus.
>>
>> Now the bull starts, and you are the one starting it. Did you know 70% of
>> Toyotas complaints for self acceleration don`t even cover the recalled
>> cars, that is from Toyotas own internal documents. And of course you were
>> with the lady when her occurance happened, so you Know its bull for a
>> fact.
> Gee, ransley...putting it in neutral didn't stop it...using the brakes
> didn't stop it...using the e-brake didn't stop it?
> Either she's full of shit, or (more likely) should probably be riding the
> bus.
> Or both.
nah, she's riding the wallet of the people paying her to perjure herself.
--
nomina rutrum rutrum
XML site map
>> On 02/23/2010 09:25 PM, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:43:42 -0800, jim beam wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02/23/2010 08:33 PM, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:59:48 -0600, Bob Cooper wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article<0ae546ee-0551-4461-b091-
>>>>>> 8c5a097a99ef@b7g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, Mark_Ransley@Yahoo.com
>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A woman testified before Congress that when her Toyota began
>>>>>>>> accelerating uncontrollably she "put the car in neutral and it had
>>>>>>>> no effect, I stepped on the brakes and it had no effect, I applied
>>>>>>>> the emergency brake and it had no effect, I even tried to put the
>>>>>>>> car into reverse and I couldn't."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Huh? Putting the car in neutral had no effect? Someone provide with
>>>>>>>> with a clue on this one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW< the car was a Lexus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now the bull starts, and you are the one starting it. Did you know
>>>>>>> 70% of Toyotas complaints for self acceleration don`t even cover the
>>>>>>> recalled cars, that is from Toyotas own internal documents. And of
>>>>>>> course you were with the lady when her occurance happened, so you
>>>>>>> Know its bull for a fact.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh, you must be mistaken.
>>>>>> This fellow knows quite a bit about cars. And his auto insights have
>>>>>> shown the Toyota problem is really GM's fault, along with Toyota
>>>>>> owners who have lied before Congress. I would go so far as to say he
>>>>>> is the world's foremost expert. And he has been kind enough to bring
>>>>>> his Toyota insights to the tech group to educate all of us who do
>>>>>> mechanical work on cars. I can't tell tell you how much we appreciate
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't mention it. Any time you need any help, you just ask me. I'd be
>>>>> glad to help you out. You do know what a car is, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Here, one more time for you:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A woman testified before Congress that when her Toyota began
>>>>>>>> accelerating uncontrollably she "put the car in neutral and it had
>>>>>>>> no effect, I stepped on the brakes and it had no effect, I applied
>>>>>>>> the emergency brake and it had no effect, I even tried to put the
>>>>>>>> car into reverse and I couldn't."
>>>>
>>>> all under oath...
>>>>
>>>> i've been to hearings like this and seen people perjure themselves with
>>>> very little provocation or pay. it's not uncommon.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure she perjured herself, but I'd bet she should NOT be behind
>>> the wheel of a car. ANY car.
>>>
>>> If you can't handle a situation like that, you shouldn't be driving. As
>>> I said, she probably had it in "Sport" and didn't bring it back through
>>> the gate into Neutral. That's the only way the car wouldn't stop in
>>> neutral.
>>>
>>> And she must have gotten it stopped SOMEHOW, since she was there to tell
>>> the tale.
>>
>> oh, she's perjuring herself. i've seen this stuff many times - there's a
>> certain theatrical circus show to these things - and a cadre of
>> individuals that will show up and say the most blatantly untrue bullshit
>> in terms that make the average vaudevillian look like an amateur.
>>
>> one case i saw, some dude showed up in a medial gown, with i.v. drips
>> taped to his arm testifying about some doctor saving his life. thing was,
>> this individual was shown not to be a patient of that doctor, nor could he
>> have been at the facility concerned. it was just theater designed for
>> show and to help sway a decision. i guess there's out-of-work actors that
>> need money /real/ bad.
>Like the time Mike J Fox didn't take his medication for two or three days
>so his Parkinson's would be more pronounced.