Hybrid Car – More Fun with Less Gas

How a thief can steal your Prius or any keyless entry vehicle

register ::  Login Password  :: Lost Password?
Posted by rats on January 22, 2011, 4:41 am


Keyless entry systems vulnerable to high-tech car thieves

Swiss researchers find holes in the keyless systems from eight car

By Colin Bird

Remote keyless entry has been around for a while – since the late
1980s, in fact – and today it’s almost standard on all new cars. But
the pervasiveness of this feature is not without consequence. As
researchers in Switzerland point out, the technology can make vehicle
theft a breeze for a savvy thief.

Remote keyless-entry systems use radio waves that typically are
specific to a manufacturer, and the signals are usually encrypted.
When your vehicle’s key fob is within 20 feet of the car, you’re
allowed to transmit a signal to unlock the doors, pop the trunk,
remote start your car (when equipped) or activate the car alarm.

Researchers at ETH Zurich discovered that these encrypted signals are
easy to intercept and trick.

Keyless entry systems are vulnerable to car thieves.
The theft works by setting up two antennas, one near the targeted
vehicle and one near the holder of the key fob — be it in a purse, bag
or pocket. This equipment can usually be purchased for $00 to $,000.
The person with the antenna aimed at the owner of the key fob needs to
get within 26 feet of the target. In a store, this could be a few
aisles away, so as to not arouse suspicion.

Once the antenna is near the intended victim’s key fob, the key
transmits a low-power signal to the antenna, which is then relayed to
the antenna near the vehicle. Once that occurs, the thief can unlock
the doors and drive away (if the vehicle has push-button start).

The Swiss researchers hacked into eight car manufacturers’
passive-entry systems using this method. No cryptology or protocol
could stop it.

While this system may seem fairly complicated, it could catch on with
car thieves because of the cost of the equipment and anonymity.
However, the hack cannot start the cars with traditional keys. Today’s
ignition systems are increasingly complicated and secure. That’s one
reason why car thefts are largely on the decline in the U.S.

David Wagner, a computer science professor at the University of
California at Berkeley, said there are probably easier way to steal
cars, but the “nasty aspect of high-tech car theft” is that it doesn’t
leave any sign of forced entry. That could lead to problems with
police and insurance companies in tracking down the criminals or with
filing claims.

Right now, the only way to protect yourself is by either shielding
your key fob’s radio with a guard or leaving your key fob at home.
Srdjan Capkun, an assistant professor at ETH Zurich, says the
institute is working on a way to prevent this sort of theft.

Posted by bwilson4web on January 22, 2011, 10:22 pm
On Jan 21, 10:41pm, r...@cheese.com wrote:

So let's see how it worked out in 2010:


". . .
The list of the top 10 most stolen cars in 2010 may not be that
different than youve seen in the past, and thats because much
doesnt change. Thieves like these cars because of their resale value
on the black market and the valuable parts that can be stripped and
sold from these vehicles. That said, the list for 2010 includes

Honda Accord/Honda Civic
Toyota Camry
Ford F-150
Dodge Ram
C/K 1500
Dodge Caravan
Toyota Corolla
Nissan Sentra
Acura Integra
Jeep Cherokee
. . ."


How the thieve steals a car is less important than the value of the
individual parts. Thankfully, the hybrid skeptics have declared the
Prius valuable parts as 'worthless' and that gives an anti-theft halo.
Please come back when you have something less silly to post. <GRINS>

Bob Wilson

Posted by DA on January 27, 2011, 7:30 pm

You're definitely onto something, Bob. I've driven my Prius for work and
have parked (including overnight although in that case on hotel
properties) in places like South Philly, Baltimore and N.E. Washington,
DC. As well as any other type of location up and down the East Coast. Not
a single theft incident. No incidents at all, come to think of it - the
only one I had in a Prius was when I got rear-ended in a quietest suburb.

So, year, the "anti-theft halo" is definitely a real phenomenon and in
many cases I would even characterize it as "invisibility cloak" . I'm
surprised drug dealers don't use Priuses more often. Doesn't help with
street cred but definitely helps to repel cops. Well, maybe they do - who

Web access courtesy
http://fuelzilla.com http://fuelzilla.com/groups/
Environmentally Friendly
Web and RSS access to your favorite newsgroup -
- 7693 messages and counting!

Posted by News on January 27, 2011, 7:52 pm
 On 1/27/2011 2:30 PM, DA wrote:

Is this phenomenon reflected in auto theft insurance rates?

Posted by DA on January 27, 2011, 9:04 pm
 responding to
DA wrote:

News wrote:

I don't know. It may actually be figured in there somewhere. My guess is
that the theft portion of the premium is so small compared to liabilities
and collision coverage that small savings in it would be nothing to get
excited about.


This Thread
Bookmark this thread:
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
please rate this thread