Posted by richard schumacher on December 2, 2007, 11:45 pm
> > The ideal solution would be middle of the night/off-peak charging,
> > where rates are frequently a small fraction of average.
>
> We have no allowances for off peak usage that I know of.
You should investigate alternate electric providers, if available.
Posted by L Alpert on December 3, 2007, 11:35 pm
richard schumacher wrote:
>>> The ideal solution would be middle of the night/off-peak charging,
>>> where rates are frequently a small fraction of average.
>>
>> We have no allowances for off peak usage that I know of.
> You should investigate alternate electric providers, if available.
Yes, I have. They are all within about $.01-.005 per KWH. The deregulation
smells of collusion.
Posted by News on December 3, 2007, 11:46 pm
L Alpert wrote:
> richard schumacher wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>>The ideal solution would be middle of the night/off-peak charging,
>>>>where rates are frequently a small fraction of average.
>>>
>>>We have no allowances for off peak usage that I know of.
>>
>>You should investigate alternate electric providers, if available.
>
>
> Yes, I have. They are all within about $.01-.005 per KWH. The deregulation
> smells of collusion.
>
>
Now THERE'S a surprise.... They spend more money telemarketing than
they do hedging/risk managing and driving down supply chain costs.
Posted by L Alpert on December 4, 2007, 11:47 pm
News wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>> richard schumacher wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> The ideal solution would be middle of the night/off-peak charging,
>>>>> where rates are frequently a small fraction of average.
>>>>
>>>> We have no allowances for off peak usage that I know of.
>>>
>>> You should investigate alternate electric providers, if available.
>>
>>
>> Yes, I have. They are all within about $.01-.005 per KWH. The
>> deregulation smells of collusion.
>>
>>
> Now THERE'S a surprise.... They spend more money telemarketing than
> they do hedging/risk managing and driving down supply chain costs.
Why pass on any savings to the end consumer? Get what the market will bear.
Posted by News on December 5, 2007, 1:27 am
L Alpert wrote:
> News wrote:
>
>>L Alpert wrote:
>>
>>>richard schumacher wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>The ideal solution would be middle of the night/off-peak charging,
>>>>>>where rates are frequently a small fraction of average.
>>>>>
>>>>>We have no allowances for off peak usage that I know of.
>>>>
>>>>You should investigate alternate electric providers, if available.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes, I have. They are all within about $.01-.005 per KWH. The
>>>deregulation smells of collusion.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>Now THERE'S a surprise.... They spend more money telemarketing than
>>they do hedging/risk managing and driving down supply chain costs.
>
>
> Why pass on any savings to the end consumer? Get what the market will bear.
>
>
Which makes the concept and implementation a fraud on the public.
No wonder it gets pushed so heavily.
XML site map
> > where rates are frequently a small fraction of average.
>
> We have no allowances for off peak usage that I know of.