Posted by Elmo P. Shagnasty on May 10, 2011, 11:15 pm
In article
> > > > > Silly, you've jumped to lying because you are losing the argument.
> >
> > > > I'm lying about what? That you claimed that because it uses a catalytic
> > > > converter, it doesn't produce carbon monoxide?
> >
> > > > I'm not lying about that at all. You said it, for the world to see.
> > > > Why would I lie about you saying something so idiotic and ignorant?
> >
> > > <YAWN>
> >
> > The fact remains, you did say it--which shows that you are idiotic and
> > ignorant, and it puts to question all of your pretty charts and graphs
> > that you've made up.
>
> <snore>
So now we know how you respond to criticism of your pretty charts and
graphs: you simply declare the critic to be "lying", and turn away.
Posted by bwilson4web on May 11, 2011, 12:19 am
wrote:
> In article
> > > > > > Silly, you've jumped to lying because you are losing the argument.
> > > > > I'm lying about what? That you claimed that because it uses a catalytic
> > > > > converter, it doesn't produce carbon monoxide?
> > > > > I'm not lying about that at all. You said it, for the world to see.
> > > > > Why would I lie about you saying something so idiotic and ignorant?
> > > > <YAWN>
> > > The fact remains, you did say it--which shows that you are idiotic and
> > > ignorant, and it puts to question all of your pretty charts and graphs
> > > that you've made up.
> > <snore>
> So now we know how you respond to criticism of your pretty charts and
> graphs: you simply declare the critic to be "lying", and turn away.
<the crickets singing>
Bob Wilson
Posted by Elmo P. Shagnasty on May 11, 2011, 11:51 am
In article
> > So now we know how you respond to criticism of your pretty charts and
> > graphs: you simply declare the critic to be "lying", and turn away.
>
> <the crickets singing>
no, Bob, you're still watching and responding.
No crickets here. And none of it changes who and what you are.
Posted by bwilson4web on May 11, 2011, 2:37 pm
wrote:
> In article
> > > So now we know how you respond to criticism of your pretty charts and
> > > graphs: you simply declare the critic to be "lying", and turn away.
> > <the crickets singing>
> no, Bob, you're still watching and responding.
> No crickets here. And none of it changes who and what you are.
<cicada chorus>
Bob Wilson
Posted by Elmo P. Shagnasty on May 12, 2011, 11:36 am
In article
> wrote:
> > In article
> >
> > > > So now we know how you respond to criticism of your pretty charts and
> > > > graphs: you simply declare the critic to be "lying", and turn away.
> >
> > > <the crickets singing>
> >
> > no, Bob, you're still watching and responding.
> >
> > No crickets here. And none of it changes who and what you are.
>
> <cicada chorus>
>
> Bob Wilson
Still paying rapt attention, I see.
XML site map
> >
> > > > I'm lying about what? That you claimed that because it uses a catalytic
> > > > converter, it doesn't produce carbon monoxide?
> >
> > > > I'm not lying about that at all. You said it, for the world to see.
> > > > Why would I lie about you saying something so idiotic and ignorant?
> >
> > > <YAWN>
> >
> > The fact remains, you did say it--which shows that you are idiotic and
> > ignorant, and it puts to question all of your pretty charts and graphs
> > that you've made up.
>
> <snore>