Hybrid Car – More Fun with Less Gas

MIT primed to unleash solar revolution - Page 14

register ::  Login Password  :: Lost Password?
Posted by Eeyore on August 6, 2008, 7:29 pm
 


"J. Clarke" wrote:


It IS the issue you damn fool. Clearly you're an engineering incompetent.

Graham


Posted by Solar Flare on August 5, 2008, 11:01 pm
 
LEL and UEL says it all. Hydrogen is the most dangerous and chemists know
it. The ignorant public and politicians don't.

wrote:
Any tank of fuel is potentially dangerous, yet we rarely hear of
welding tanks and storage tanks exploding unless someone did something
really stupid.  Why is hydrogen storage suddenly the Bogey Man of
dangerous gases?

R



Posted by Eeyore on August 5, 2008, 2:19 am
 

"J. Clarke" wrote:


Ii wouldn't run an ICE on hydrogen.

Graham


Posted by J. Clarke on August 5, 2008, 6:33 am
 Eeyore wrote:

So what would you run it on?

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)



Posted by Eeyore on August 5, 2008, 8:28 am
 

"J. Clarke" wrote:


Liquid fuel of some description combined with electricity for shorter
ranges i.e. the (preferably IMO series) PHEV.

Did you see what an exploding gas cylinder did to Qantas QF30 a few days
back btw ? Imagine that happening in your high street !

Graham


This Thread
Bookmark this thread:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
please rate this thread