Hybrid Car – More Fun with Less Gas

Re: Solar water heating system value - Page 31

register ::  Login Password  :: Lost Password?
Posted by meow2222 on March 10, 2006, 3:10 am
 
Rob Dekker wrote:


When are folks going to wake up and notice the 20 was a solar system
saving figure, not an annual HW spend figure. It was from a thread a
couple of months ago talking about a study of commercial systems. I did
go to get a link but wasnt willing to wade through another >100 posts
to find it.


NT


Posted by David Hansen on March 10, 2006, 8:54 am
 
On 9 Mar 2006 19:10:56 -0800 someone who may be meow2222@care2.com
wrote this:-


Some people did notice that it was a saving figure. In fact I
suspect that everyone noticed it.

However, several people thought it was a very low figure.



--
  David Hansen, Edinburgh
 I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

Posted by meow2222 on March 11, 2006, 12:49 am
 Rob Dekker wrote:

David Hansen wrote:

You also need to wake up before posting. Read the bit you snipped.
Honestly!


NT


Posted by David Hansen on March 11, 2006, 10:51 am
 On 10 Mar 2006 16:49:59 -0800 someone who may be meow2222@care2.com
wrote this:-


Not only can you read my mind, but you can read it back in time.
That would be fascinating, if you were able to do it.


I did. However, the figure remains a low one, no matter where it
came from.


--
  David Hansen, Edinburgh
 I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

Posted by meow2222 on March 13, 2006, 3:09 am
 David Hansen wrote:

Do you want me to put it more directly? I certainly can.



Then you were shall we say asleep.



thank you Captain Obvious. Have you provided a figure to rebut mine
with? I take it you have nothing to contribute on that point.


NT


This Thread
Bookmark this thread:
 
 
 
 
 
 
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
please rate this thread