Posted by simple_language@yahoo.com on April 7, 2007, 5:30 pm
http://www.ez2c.de/ml/solar_land_area/
Posted by Rich on April 7, 2007, 5:46 pm
simple_language@yahoo.com simple_language@yahoo.com said:
> http://www.ez2c.de/ml/solar_land_area/
>
>
We'd better strike that idea, tear down the wind farms and stick with burning
coal as our magic bullet. It's common sense.
Posted by ABLE_1 on April 7, 2007, 6:21 pm
Not to mention the missing calculation for transmission losses due to
distance from source.
> simple_language@yahoo.com simple_language@yahoo.com said:
>> http://www.ez2c.de/ml/solar_land_area/
>>
>>
> We'd better strike that idea, tear down the wind farms and stick with
> burning
> coal as our magic bullet. It's common sense.
>
Posted by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roland_M=F6sl?= on April 9, 2007, 3:04 pm
> Not to mention the missing calculation for transmission losses due to
> distance from source.
Where are tranmission looses,
when every house has all the roof only with photovoltaic?
--
Roland Mösl
http://car.pege.org cars and traffic
http://live.pege.org building and live
http://www.pege.org
Posted by Eeyore on April 9, 2007, 3:13 pm
Roland Mösl wrote:
> > Not to mention the missing calculation for transmission losses due to
> > distance from source.
> Where are tranmission looses,
> when every house has all the roof only with photovoltaic?
You think we only need electricity when the sun's shining ?
Graham
XML site map
>
>