Posted by Eeyore on October 17, 2007, 8:38 am
Andy Hall wrote:
Experience shows that many individuals spent their money unwisely. Or simply
maybe they are unaware of better sensible options.
I agree with the idea about nuclear generation. I think it's the best, simplest,
fastest option to reduce fossil fuel based energy usage and if nothing else that
will have a positive result for 'energy security' issues.
An interesting point.
I'd make politicians have to pass an exam for intellectual competency too.
Posted by Huge on October 17, 2007, 9:23 am
It's their money. Not yours.
"A computer is a nerd-designed machine for screwdriver addicts."
[email me at huge huge (dot) org <dot> uk]
Posted by Jim on October 19, 2007, 12:25 am
Not yet. <eg>
Posted by Andy Hall on October 17, 2007, 8:47 pm
On 2007-10-17 09:38:31 +0100, Eeyore
That may be, but it is their money unless you fancy yourself in the
role of Alastair Wotshisname.
On could then discuss Indian and Chinese takeaways of coal fired power
There are few who would pass that - particularly on the government benches.
Posted by John Stumbles on October 17, 2007, 9:50 pm
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:38:31 +0100, Eeyore wrote:
Yup, plenty of uranium mines in the UK, unlike wind and waves which we
have to import from dodgy forriners.
Pessimists are never disappointed